Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module

A. L. Kalet, H. S. Song, U. Sarpel, R. Schwartz, J. Brenner, T. K. Ark, Jan Plass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Well-designed computer-assisted instruction (CAI) can potentially transform medical education. Yet little is known about whether specific design features such as direct manipulation of the content yield meaningful gains in clinical learning. We designed three versions of a multimedia module on the abdominal exam incorporating different types of interactivity. Methods: As part of their physical diagnosis course, 162 second-year medical students were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to Watch, Click or Drag versions of the abdominal exam module. First, students' prior knowledge, spatial ability, and prior experience with abdominal exams were assessed. After using the module, students took a posttest; demonstrated the abdominal exam on a standardized patient; and wrote structured notes of their findings. Results: Data from143 students were analyzed. Baseline measures showed no differences among groups regarding prior knowledge, experience, or spatial ability. Overall there was no difference in knowledge across groups. However, physical exam scores were significantly higher for students in the Click group. Conclusions: A mid-range level of behavioral interactivity was associated with small to moderate improvements in performance of clinical skills. These improvements were likely mediated by enhanced engagement with the material, within the bounds of learners' cognitive capacity. These findings have implications for the design of CAI materials to teach procedural skills.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)833-839
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume34
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
interactive media
Computer-Assisted Instruction
Learning
Students
learning
performance
student
instruction
Multimedia
Group
ability
Medical Education
Medical Students
knowledge
multimedia
manipulation
medical student
experience
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module. / Kalet, A. L.; Song, H. S.; Sarpel, U.; Schwartz, R.; Brenner, J.; Ark, T. K.; Plass, Jan.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 34, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 833-839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kalet, A. L. ; Song, H. S. ; Sarpel, U. ; Schwartz, R. ; Brenner, J. ; Ark, T. K. ; Plass, Jan. / Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module. In: Medical Teacher. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 10. pp. 833-839.
@article{e7eed7d5152141d9b2cb91cea8ec6599,
title = "Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module",
abstract = "Background: Well-designed computer-assisted instruction (CAI) can potentially transform medical education. Yet little is known about whether specific design features such as direct manipulation of the content yield meaningful gains in clinical learning. We designed three versions of a multimedia module on the abdominal exam incorporating different types of interactivity. Methods: As part of their physical diagnosis course, 162 second-year medical students were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to Watch, Click or Drag versions of the abdominal exam module. First, students' prior knowledge, spatial ability, and prior experience with abdominal exams were assessed. After using the module, students took a posttest; demonstrated the abdominal exam on a standardized patient; and wrote structured notes of their findings. Results: Data from143 students were analyzed. Baseline measures showed no differences among groups regarding prior knowledge, experience, or spatial ability. Overall there was no difference in knowledge across groups. However, physical exam scores were significantly higher for students in the Click group. Conclusions: A mid-range level of behavioral interactivity was associated with small to moderate improvements in performance of clinical skills. These improvements were likely mediated by enhanced engagement with the material, within the bounds of learners' cognitive capacity. These findings have implications for the design of CAI materials to teach procedural skills.",
author = "Kalet, {A. L.} and Song, {H. S.} and U. Sarpel and R. Schwartz and J. Brenner and Ark, {T. K.} and Jan Plass",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2012.706727",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "833--839",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module

AU - Kalet, A. L.

AU - Song, H. S.

AU - Sarpel, U.

AU - Schwartz, R.

AU - Brenner, J.

AU - Ark, T. K.

AU - Plass, Jan

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Background: Well-designed computer-assisted instruction (CAI) can potentially transform medical education. Yet little is known about whether specific design features such as direct manipulation of the content yield meaningful gains in clinical learning. We designed three versions of a multimedia module on the abdominal exam incorporating different types of interactivity. Methods: As part of their physical diagnosis course, 162 second-year medical students were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to Watch, Click or Drag versions of the abdominal exam module. First, students' prior knowledge, spatial ability, and prior experience with abdominal exams were assessed. After using the module, students took a posttest; demonstrated the abdominal exam on a standardized patient; and wrote structured notes of their findings. Results: Data from143 students were analyzed. Baseline measures showed no differences among groups regarding prior knowledge, experience, or spatial ability. Overall there was no difference in knowledge across groups. However, physical exam scores were significantly higher for students in the Click group. Conclusions: A mid-range level of behavioral interactivity was associated with small to moderate improvements in performance of clinical skills. These improvements were likely mediated by enhanced engagement with the material, within the bounds of learners' cognitive capacity. These findings have implications for the design of CAI materials to teach procedural skills.

AB - Background: Well-designed computer-assisted instruction (CAI) can potentially transform medical education. Yet little is known about whether specific design features such as direct manipulation of the content yield meaningful gains in clinical learning. We designed three versions of a multimedia module on the abdominal exam incorporating different types of interactivity. Methods: As part of their physical diagnosis course, 162 second-year medical students were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to Watch, Click or Drag versions of the abdominal exam module. First, students' prior knowledge, spatial ability, and prior experience with abdominal exams were assessed. After using the module, students took a posttest; demonstrated the abdominal exam on a standardized patient; and wrote structured notes of their findings. Results: Data from143 students were analyzed. Baseline measures showed no differences among groups regarding prior knowledge, experience, or spatial ability. Overall there was no difference in knowledge across groups. However, physical exam scores were significantly higher for students in the Click group. Conclusions: A mid-range level of behavioral interactivity was associated with small to moderate improvements in performance of clinical skills. These improvements were likely mediated by enhanced engagement with the material, within the bounds of learners' cognitive capacity. These findings have implications for the design of CAI materials to teach procedural skills.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867963774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867963774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.706727

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.706727

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 833

EP - 839

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 10

ER -