Abstract
We utilize a large employer-level panel dataset to explore the links between gross job flows and gross worker flows. Our findings have relevance for models of job creation and job destruction, and labor reallocation. We find churning flows (the difference between worker and job flows at the level of the employer) to be high, pervasive, and highly persistent within employers, suggesting that they arise as a correlate of an equilibrium personnel policy. We find the dynamic relationship between job and worker flows to be quite complex: lagged job flows raise churning flows, and lagged churning flows reduce employment growth.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 473-502 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Labor Economics |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - Jul 2000 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Economics and Econometrics
Cite this
Job flows, worker flows, and churning. / Burgess, Simon; Lane, Julia; Stevens, David.
In: Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 07.2000, p. 473-502.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Job flows, worker flows, and churning
AU - Burgess, Simon
AU - Lane, Julia
AU - Stevens, David
PY - 2000/7
Y1 - 2000/7
N2 - We utilize a large employer-level panel dataset to explore the links between gross job flows and gross worker flows. Our findings have relevance for models of job creation and job destruction, and labor reallocation. We find churning flows (the difference between worker and job flows at the level of the employer) to be high, pervasive, and highly persistent within employers, suggesting that they arise as a correlate of an equilibrium personnel policy. We find the dynamic relationship between job and worker flows to be quite complex: lagged job flows raise churning flows, and lagged churning flows reduce employment growth.
AB - We utilize a large employer-level panel dataset to explore the links between gross job flows and gross worker flows. Our findings have relevance for models of job creation and job destruction, and labor reallocation. We find churning flows (the difference between worker and job flows at the level of the employer) to be high, pervasive, and highly persistent within employers, suggesting that they arise as a correlate of an equilibrium personnel policy. We find the dynamic relationship between job and worker flows to be quite complex: lagged job flows raise churning flows, and lagged churning flows reduce employment growth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034417259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034417259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
VL - 18
SP - 473
EP - 502
JO - Journal of Labor Economics
JF - Journal of Labor Economics
SN - 0734-306X
IS - 3
ER -