It’s Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science

Jennifer L. Tackett, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Christopher J. Patrick, Sheri L. Johnson, Robert F. Krueger, Joshua D. Miller, Thomas F. Oltmanns, Patrick Shrout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Psychology is in the early stages of examining a crisis of replicability stemming from several high-profile failures to replicate studies in experimental psychology. This important conversation has largely been focused on social psychology, with some active participation from cognitive psychology. Nevertheless, several other major domains of psychological science—including clinical science—have remained insulated from this discussion. The goals of this article are to (a) examine why clinical psychology and allied fields, such as counseling and school psychology, have not been central participants in the replicability conversation; (b) review concerns and recommendations that are less (or more) applicable to or appropriate for research in clinical psychology and allied fields; and (c) generate take-home messages for scholars and consumers of the literature in clinical psychology and allied fields, as well as reviewers, editors, and colleagues from other areas of psychological science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)742-756
Number of pages15
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Clinical Psychology
Psychology
Experimental Psychology
Social Psychology
Counseling
Research

Keywords

  • assessment
  • diagnosis
  • disorders
  • scientific methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

It’s Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation : Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science. / Tackett, Jennifer L.; Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Patrick, Christopher J.; Johnson, Sheri L.; Krueger, Robert F.; Miller, Joshua D.; Oltmanns, Thomas F.; Shrout, Patrick.

In: Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 12, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 742-756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tackett, JL, Lilienfeld, SO, Patrick, CJ, Johnson, SL, Krueger, RF, Miller, JD, Oltmanns, TF & Shrout, P 2017, 'It’s Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science', Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 742-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617690042
Tackett, Jennifer L. ; Lilienfeld, Scott O. ; Patrick, Christopher J. ; Johnson, Sheri L. ; Krueger, Robert F. ; Miller, Joshua D. ; Oltmanns, Thomas F. ; Shrout, Patrick. / It’s Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation : Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science. In: Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 742-756.
@article{9a380a6cb09e431bb544941de57211c8,
title = "It’s Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science",
abstract = "Psychology is in the early stages of examining a crisis of replicability stemming from several high-profile failures to replicate studies in experimental psychology. This important conversation has largely been focused on social psychology, with some active participation from cognitive psychology. Nevertheless, several other major domains of psychological science—including clinical science—have remained insulated from this discussion. The goals of this article are to (a) examine why clinical psychology and allied fields, such as counseling and school psychology, have not been central participants in the replicability conversation; (b) review concerns and recommendations that are less (or more) applicable to or appropriate for research in clinical psychology and allied fields; and (c) generate take-home messages for scholars and consumers of the literature in clinical psychology and allied fields, as well as reviewers, editors, and colleagues from other areas of psychological science.",
keywords = "assessment, diagnosis, disorders, scientific methodology",
author = "Tackett, {Jennifer L.} and Lilienfeld, {Scott O.} and Patrick, {Christopher J.} and Johnson, {Sheri L.} and Krueger, {Robert F.} and Miller, {Joshua D.} and Oltmanns, {Thomas F.} and Patrick Shrout",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1745691617690042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "742--756",
journal = "Perspectives on Psychological Science",
issn = "1745-6916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It’s Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation

T2 - Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science

AU - Tackett, Jennifer L.

AU - Lilienfeld, Scott O.

AU - Patrick, Christopher J.

AU - Johnson, Sheri L.

AU - Krueger, Robert F.

AU - Miller, Joshua D.

AU - Oltmanns, Thomas F.

AU - Shrout, Patrick

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Psychology is in the early stages of examining a crisis of replicability stemming from several high-profile failures to replicate studies in experimental psychology. This important conversation has largely been focused on social psychology, with some active participation from cognitive psychology. Nevertheless, several other major domains of psychological science—including clinical science—have remained insulated from this discussion. The goals of this article are to (a) examine why clinical psychology and allied fields, such as counseling and school psychology, have not been central participants in the replicability conversation; (b) review concerns and recommendations that are less (or more) applicable to or appropriate for research in clinical psychology and allied fields; and (c) generate take-home messages for scholars and consumers of the literature in clinical psychology and allied fields, as well as reviewers, editors, and colleagues from other areas of psychological science.

AB - Psychology is in the early stages of examining a crisis of replicability stemming from several high-profile failures to replicate studies in experimental psychology. This important conversation has largely been focused on social psychology, with some active participation from cognitive psychology. Nevertheless, several other major domains of psychological science—including clinical science—have remained insulated from this discussion. The goals of this article are to (a) examine why clinical psychology and allied fields, such as counseling and school psychology, have not been central participants in the replicability conversation; (b) review concerns and recommendations that are less (or more) applicable to or appropriate for research in clinical psychology and allied fields; and (c) generate take-home messages for scholars and consumers of the literature in clinical psychology and allied fields, as well as reviewers, editors, and colleagues from other areas of psychological science.

KW - assessment

KW - diagnosis

KW - disorders

KW - scientific methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030687485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030687485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1745691617690042

DO - 10.1177/1745691617690042

M3 - Article

C2 - 28972844

AN - SCOPUS:85030687485

VL - 12

SP - 742

EP - 756

JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science

JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science

SN - 1745-6916

IS - 5

ER -