Issues, economics, and the dynamics of multiparty elections: The British 1987 general election

R. Michael Alvarez, Jonathan Nagler, Shaun Bowler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We offer a model of multiparty elections that combines voters' retrospective economic evaluations with consideration of parties' issue positions and the issue preferences of voters. We show that both policy issues and the state of the economy matter in British elections. In 1987 voters made a largely retrospective evaluation of the Conservatives based on economic performance; those who rejected the Conservative Party chose between Labour and Alliance based on issue positions. Through simulations we move the parties in the issue space and reestimate vote shares as well as hypothesize an alternative distribution of views on the economy, and we show that Labour had virtually no chance to win with a centrist party as a viable alternative. The predictions from our 1987 simulations are supported in an analysis of the 1992 British election. We argue for multinomial probit in studying three-party elections because it allows for a richer formulation of politics than do competing methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-149
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume94
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2000

Fingerprint

election
economics
labor
conservative party
simulation
economy
evaluation
voter
politics
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Issues, economics, and the dynamics of multiparty elections : The British 1987 general election. / Alvarez, R. Michael; Nagler, Jonathan; Bowler, Shaun.

In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 1, 03.2000, p. 131-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48e2e90b453c48b5bc85abcb1cb39fbb,
title = "Issues, economics, and the dynamics of multiparty elections: The British 1987 general election",
abstract = "We offer a model of multiparty elections that combines voters' retrospective economic evaluations with consideration of parties' issue positions and the issue preferences of voters. We show that both policy issues and the state of the economy matter in British elections. In 1987 voters made a largely retrospective evaluation of the Conservatives based on economic performance; those who rejected the Conservative Party chose between Labour and Alliance based on issue positions. Through simulations we move the parties in the issue space and reestimate vote shares as well as hypothesize an alternative distribution of views on the economy, and we show that Labour had virtually no chance to win with a centrist party as a viable alternative. The predictions from our 1987 simulations are supported in an analysis of the 1992 British election. We argue for multinomial probit in studying three-party elections because it allows for a richer formulation of politics than do competing methods.",
author = "Alvarez, {R. Michael} and Jonathan Nagler and Shaun Bowler",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "131--149",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues, economics, and the dynamics of multiparty elections

T2 - The British 1987 general election

AU - Alvarez, R. Michael

AU - Nagler, Jonathan

AU - Bowler, Shaun

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - We offer a model of multiparty elections that combines voters' retrospective economic evaluations with consideration of parties' issue positions and the issue preferences of voters. We show that both policy issues and the state of the economy matter in British elections. In 1987 voters made a largely retrospective evaluation of the Conservatives based on economic performance; those who rejected the Conservative Party chose between Labour and Alliance based on issue positions. Through simulations we move the parties in the issue space and reestimate vote shares as well as hypothesize an alternative distribution of views on the economy, and we show that Labour had virtually no chance to win with a centrist party as a viable alternative. The predictions from our 1987 simulations are supported in an analysis of the 1992 British election. We argue for multinomial probit in studying three-party elections because it allows for a richer formulation of politics than do competing methods.

AB - We offer a model of multiparty elections that combines voters' retrospective economic evaluations with consideration of parties' issue positions and the issue preferences of voters. We show that both policy issues and the state of the economy matter in British elections. In 1987 voters made a largely retrospective evaluation of the Conservatives based on economic performance; those who rejected the Conservative Party chose between Labour and Alliance based on issue positions. Through simulations we move the parties in the issue space and reestimate vote shares as well as hypothesize an alternative distribution of views on the economy, and we show that Labour had virtually no chance to win with a centrist party as a viable alternative. The predictions from our 1987 simulations are supported in an analysis of the 1992 British election. We argue for multinomial probit in studying three-party elections because it allows for a richer formulation of politics than do competing methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034146846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034146846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034146846

VL - 94

SP - 131

EP - 149

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 1

ER -