Introduction. after the Urban Crisis: New York and the Rise of Inequality

Themis Chronopoulos, Jonathan Soffer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The introduction to this special section argues that the deconstruction of the city's municipal social democracy was overdetermined by shifts in the global political economy toward increased income inequality and the depoliticization of national economic management. The city's creditors forced it into an ideologically-motivated program of market discipline that cut its operating budget as the city's economy financialized, defined by Greta Krippner as "the tendency for profit making in the economy to occur increasingly through financial channels rather than through productive activities." The city's leaders believed that their program would revive the city for the middle class. But financialization exacerbated income inequality. In 1970, the top 0.01 percent of earners made fifty times the average income; by 1998, that figure had increased to 250 times the average income. In 2013 Mayor Michael Bloomberg commented that: "If we could get every billionaire around the world to move here, it would be a godsend that would create a much bigger income gap," which, he argued, was good for the whole city, because it would raise its tax base. The four articles of this section are part of a new and growing body of historical works about New York City since the 1970s that challenge the linear narratives of concepts such as neoliberalism, gentrification, public space, law and order, and resistance by reviewing how ordinary New Yorkers coped with declining infrastructure, services, standards of living, and increasing inequality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)855-863
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Urban History
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

income
law and order
social democracy
creditor
economy
gentrification
standard of living
mayor
public space
neoliberalism
taxes
middle class
political economy
profit
budget
living standard
city
Urban Crisis
Income
leader

Keywords

  • Inequality
  • Neoliberalism
  • New York City
  • Urban Crisis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Introduction. after the Urban Crisis : New York and the Rise of Inequality. / Chronopoulos, Themis; Soffer, Jonathan.

In: Journal of Urban History, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 855-863.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6137c25757ba43bc92ae96bbb450f9d1,
title = "Introduction. after the Urban Crisis: New York and the Rise of Inequality",
abstract = "The introduction to this special section argues that the deconstruction of the city's municipal social democracy was overdetermined by shifts in the global political economy toward increased income inequality and the depoliticization of national economic management. The city's creditors forced it into an ideologically-motivated program of market discipline that cut its operating budget as the city's economy financialized, defined by Greta Krippner as {"}the tendency for profit making in the economy to occur increasingly through financial channels rather than through productive activities.{"} The city's leaders believed that their program would revive the city for the middle class. But financialization exacerbated income inequality. In 1970, the top 0.01 percent of earners made fifty times the average income; by 1998, that figure had increased to 250 times the average income. In 2013 Mayor Michael Bloomberg commented that: {"}If we could get every billionaire around the world to move here, it would be a godsend that would create a much bigger income gap,{"} which, he argued, was good for the whole city, because it would raise its tax base. The four articles of this section are part of a new and growing body of historical works about New York City since the 1970s that challenge the linear narratives of concepts such as neoliberalism, gentrification, public space, law and order, and resistance by reviewing how ordinary New Yorkers coped with declining infrastructure, services, standards of living, and increasing inequality.",
keywords = "Inequality, Neoliberalism, New York City, Urban Crisis",
author = "Themis Chronopoulos and Jonathan Soffer",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0096144217714758",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "855--863",
journal = "Journal of Urban History",
issn = "0096-1442",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction. after the Urban Crisis

T2 - New York and the Rise of Inequality

AU - Chronopoulos, Themis

AU - Soffer, Jonathan

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - The introduction to this special section argues that the deconstruction of the city's municipal social democracy was overdetermined by shifts in the global political economy toward increased income inequality and the depoliticization of national economic management. The city's creditors forced it into an ideologically-motivated program of market discipline that cut its operating budget as the city's economy financialized, defined by Greta Krippner as "the tendency for profit making in the economy to occur increasingly through financial channels rather than through productive activities." The city's leaders believed that their program would revive the city for the middle class. But financialization exacerbated income inequality. In 1970, the top 0.01 percent of earners made fifty times the average income; by 1998, that figure had increased to 250 times the average income. In 2013 Mayor Michael Bloomberg commented that: "If we could get every billionaire around the world to move here, it would be a godsend that would create a much bigger income gap," which, he argued, was good for the whole city, because it would raise its tax base. The four articles of this section are part of a new and growing body of historical works about New York City since the 1970s that challenge the linear narratives of concepts such as neoliberalism, gentrification, public space, law and order, and resistance by reviewing how ordinary New Yorkers coped with declining infrastructure, services, standards of living, and increasing inequality.

AB - The introduction to this special section argues that the deconstruction of the city's municipal social democracy was overdetermined by shifts in the global political economy toward increased income inequality and the depoliticization of national economic management. The city's creditors forced it into an ideologically-motivated program of market discipline that cut its operating budget as the city's economy financialized, defined by Greta Krippner as "the tendency for profit making in the economy to occur increasingly through financial channels rather than through productive activities." The city's leaders believed that their program would revive the city for the middle class. But financialization exacerbated income inequality. In 1970, the top 0.01 percent of earners made fifty times the average income; by 1998, that figure had increased to 250 times the average income. In 2013 Mayor Michael Bloomberg commented that: "If we could get every billionaire around the world to move here, it would be a godsend that would create a much bigger income gap," which, he argued, was good for the whole city, because it would raise its tax base. The four articles of this section are part of a new and growing body of historical works about New York City since the 1970s that challenge the linear narratives of concepts such as neoliberalism, gentrification, public space, law and order, and resistance by reviewing how ordinary New Yorkers coped with declining infrastructure, services, standards of living, and increasing inequality.

KW - Inequality

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - New York City

KW - Urban Crisis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031329025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031329025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0096144217714758

DO - 10.1177/0096144217714758

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85031329025

VL - 43

SP - 855

EP - 863

JO - Journal of Urban History

JF - Journal of Urban History

SN - 0096-1442

IS - 6

ER -