Introduction: A brief history of neuroeconomics

Paul Glimcher, Colin F. Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Russell A. Poldrack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This chapter explores historical facts associated with neuroeconomics. The birth of Economics is often traced back to Adam Smith's publication The Wealth of Nations in 1776. With this publication began the classical period of economic theory. Smith described a number of phenomena critical for understanding choice behavior and the aggregation of choices into market activity. These were, in essence, psychological insights. They were relatively ad hoc rules that explained how features of the environment influenced the behavior of a nation of consumers and producers. Despite these impressive accomplishments, "neuroeconomics" is at best a decade old and has yet to demonstrate a critical role in neuroscience, psychology, or economics. Indeed, scholars within neuroeconomics are still debating whether neuroscientific data will provide theory for economists or whether economic theory will provide structure for neuroscience. We hope that both the goals will be accomplished, but the exact form of this contribution is not yet clear. However, there are also skeptical voices. For example, Pareto and Friedman came up with the arguments that economics is only about choices that still lives in the form of fundamentalist critique, whereas Gul and Pesendorfer argued further that neuroscientific data and neuroscientific theories should, in principle, be unwelcome in economics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalUnknown Journal
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

History
Economics
Neuroscience
Neurosciences
Choice Behavior
Psychology
Critical Phenomena
Pareto
Publications
Aggregation
Agglomeration
Parturition
Demonstrate
Form

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Introduction : A brief history of neuroeconomics. / Glimcher, Paul; Camerer, Colin F.; Fehr, Ernst; Poldrack, Russell A.

In: Unknown Journal, 2009, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glimcher, Paul ; Camerer, Colin F. ; Fehr, Ernst ; Poldrack, Russell A. / Introduction : A brief history of neuroeconomics. In: Unknown Journal. 2009 ; pp. 1-12.
@article{00c0a63330154528acbe01245a628f5a,
title = "Introduction: A brief history of neuroeconomics",
abstract = "This chapter explores historical facts associated with neuroeconomics. The birth of Economics is often traced back to Adam Smith's publication The Wealth of Nations in 1776. With this publication began the classical period of economic theory. Smith described a number of phenomena critical for understanding choice behavior and the aggregation of choices into market activity. These were, in essence, psychological insights. They were relatively ad hoc rules that explained how features of the environment influenced the behavior of a nation of consumers and producers. Despite these impressive accomplishments, {"}neuroeconomics{"} is at best a decade old and has yet to demonstrate a critical role in neuroscience, psychology, or economics. Indeed, scholars within neuroeconomics are still debating whether neuroscientific data will provide theory for economists or whether economic theory will provide structure for neuroscience. We hope that both the goals will be accomplished, but the exact form of this contribution is not yet clear. However, there are also skeptical voices. For example, Pareto and Friedman came up with the arguments that economics is only about choices that still lives in the form of fundamentalist critique, whereas Gul and Pesendorfer argued further that neuroscientific data and neuroscientific theories should, in principle, be unwelcome in economics.",
author = "Paul Glimcher and Camerer, {Colin F.} and Ernst Fehr and Poldrack, {Russell A.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-374176-9.00001-4",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Theoretical Computer Science",
issn = "0304-3975",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction

T2 - A brief history of neuroeconomics

AU - Glimcher, Paul

AU - Camerer, Colin F.

AU - Fehr, Ernst

AU - Poldrack, Russell A.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This chapter explores historical facts associated with neuroeconomics. The birth of Economics is often traced back to Adam Smith's publication The Wealth of Nations in 1776. With this publication began the classical period of economic theory. Smith described a number of phenomena critical for understanding choice behavior and the aggregation of choices into market activity. These were, in essence, psychological insights. They were relatively ad hoc rules that explained how features of the environment influenced the behavior of a nation of consumers and producers. Despite these impressive accomplishments, "neuroeconomics" is at best a decade old and has yet to demonstrate a critical role in neuroscience, psychology, or economics. Indeed, scholars within neuroeconomics are still debating whether neuroscientific data will provide theory for economists or whether economic theory will provide structure for neuroscience. We hope that both the goals will be accomplished, but the exact form of this contribution is not yet clear. However, there are also skeptical voices. For example, Pareto and Friedman came up with the arguments that economics is only about choices that still lives in the form of fundamentalist critique, whereas Gul and Pesendorfer argued further that neuroscientific data and neuroscientific theories should, in principle, be unwelcome in economics.

AB - This chapter explores historical facts associated with neuroeconomics. The birth of Economics is often traced back to Adam Smith's publication The Wealth of Nations in 1776. With this publication began the classical period of economic theory. Smith described a number of phenomena critical for understanding choice behavior and the aggregation of choices into market activity. These were, in essence, psychological insights. They were relatively ad hoc rules that explained how features of the environment influenced the behavior of a nation of consumers and producers. Despite these impressive accomplishments, "neuroeconomics" is at best a decade old and has yet to demonstrate a critical role in neuroscience, psychology, or economics. Indeed, scholars within neuroeconomics are still debating whether neuroscientific data will provide theory for economists or whether economic theory will provide structure for neuroscience. We hope that both the goals will be accomplished, but the exact form of this contribution is not yet clear. However, there are also skeptical voices. For example, Pareto and Friedman came up with the arguments that economics is only about choices that still lives in the form of fundamentalist critique, whereas Gul and Pesendorfer argued further that neuroscientific data and neuroscientific theories should, in principle, be unwelcome in economics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882548230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882548230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-374176-9.00001-4

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-374176-9.00001-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84882548230

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Theoretical Computer Science

JF - Theoretical Computer Science

SN - 0304-3975

ER -