Introduction

Marybeth Shinn, Hirokazu Yoshikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This chapter introduces ways that social researchers can transform youth-serving settings in order to promote positive youth development. Interventions can occur at multiple levels, ranging from face-to-face settings such as classrooms or after-school programs to larger structures such as schools and communities to social policies, and interventions at different levels may affect one another. A model developed by Tseng and Seidman that characterizes social settings in terms of their social processes, resources, and the organization of resources is useful in organizing theories of change. Setting-level measurement plays important roles in motivating change and in guiding and monitoring change efforts. The chapter asks when it is appropriate to use aggregate information about individuals (such as average test scores) to characterize settings, and introduces alternative ways to measure setting features detailed in other chapters. When policy makers focus only on individual outcomes and not on setting features that affect outcomes, they risk holding setting accountable for issues that are not under their control and miss the opportunity to hold settings accountable for features that they do control and which they can change to improve outcomes for youth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUnknown Journal
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

Level measurement
Resources
Score Test
Public Policy
Administrative Personnel
Monitoring
Research Personnel
Organizations
Transform
Alternatives
Policy
Model
Community

Keywords

  • Aggregate data
  • Levels of analysis
  • Measurement
  • Positive youth development
  • Setting features
  • Social policy
  • Social processes
  • Social settings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Introduction. / Shinn, Marybeth; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu.

In: Unknown Journal, 01.04.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91646a3b35fd4d18808002e25d76a22c,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "This chapter introduces ways that social researchers can transform youth-serving settings in order to promote positive youth development. Interventions can occur at multiple levels, ranging from face-to-face settings such as classrooms or after-school programs to larger structures such as schools and communities to social policies, and interventions at different levels may affect one another. A model developed by Tseng and Seidman that characterizes social settings in terms of their social processes, resources, and the organization of resources is useful in organizing theories of change. Setting-level measurement plays important roles in motivating change and in guiding and monitoring change efforts. The chapter asks when it is appropriate to use aggregate information about individuals (such as average test scores) to characterize settings, and introduces alternative ways to measure setting features detailed in other chapters. When policy makers focus only on individual outcomes and not on setting features that affect outcomes, they risk holding setting accountable for issues that are not under their control and miss the opportunity to hold settings accountable for features that they do control and which they can change to improve outcomes for youth.",
keywords = "Aggregate data, Levels of analysis, Measurement, Positive youth development, Setting features, Social policy, Social processes, Social settings",
author = "Marybeth Shinn and Hirokazu Yoshikawa",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.003.0001",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Theoretical Computer Science",
issn = "0304-3975",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction

AU - Shinn, Marybeth

AU - Yoshikawa, Hirokazu

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - This chapter introduces ways that social researchers can transform youth-serving settings in order to promote positive youth development. Interventions can occur at multiple levels, ranging from face-to-face settings such as classrooms or after-school programs to larger structures such as schools and communities to social policies, and interventions at different levels may affect one another. A model developed by Tseng and Seidman that characterizes social settings in terms of their social processes, resources, and the organization of resources is useful in organizing theories of change. Setting-level measurement plays important roles in motivating change and in guiding and monitoring change efforts. The chapter asks when it is appropriate to use aggregate information about individuals (such as average test scores) to characterize settings, and introduces alternative ways to measure setting features detailed in other chapters. When policy makers focus only on individual outcomes and not on setting features that affect outcomes, they risk holding setting accountable for issues that are not under their control and miss the opportunity to hold settings accountable for features that they do control and which they can change to improve outcomes for youth.

AB - This chapter introduces ways that social researchers can transform youth-serving settings in order to promote positive youth development. Interventions can occur at multiple levels, ranging from face-to-face settings such as classrooms or after-school programs to larger structures such as schools and communities to social policies, and interventions at different levels may affect one another. A model developed by Tseng and Seidman that characterizes social settings in terms of their social processes, resources, and the organization of resources is useful in organizing theories of change. Setting-level measurement plays important roles in motivating change and in guiding and monitoring change efforts. The chapter asks when it is appropriate to use aggregate information about individuals (such as average test scores) to characterize settings, and introduces alternative ways to measure setting features detailed in other chapters. When policy makers focus only on individual outcomes and not on setting features that affect outcomes, they risk holding setting accountable for issues that are not under their control and miss the opportunity to hold settings accountable for features that they do control and which they can change to improve outcomes for youth.

KW - Aggregate data

KW - Levels of analysis

KW - Measurement

KW - Positive youth development

KW - Setting features

KW - Social policy

KW - Social processes

KW - Social settings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920558033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920558033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.003.0001

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.003.0001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84920558033

JO - Theoretical Computer Science

JF - Theoretical Computer Science

SN - 0304-3975

ER -