Introduction

Andrew Sabl, Rahul Sagar

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

The realist movement in political thought has until recently been defined as much by its enemies as by its theses. It has often spent more time explaining what was wrong with ideal theory than doing realist theory. This essay argues that realism is entering a new phase, constructive rather than combative. It identifies three modes of constructive or affirmative realist theory (present in this volume’s essays and elsewhere). The first focuses on feasibility; the second revisits the realist canon; and the third shows how familiar ideologies can be defended without appealing to the abstract or abstruse philosophical claims on which they are often sought to rely. The essay does not seek unity where none can be found. It counsels accepting that the family surnamed Realism is a large and nontraditional one in which splits and remarriages are not unknown and many prospective partners raise eyebrows.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-275
Number of pages7
JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2017

Fingerprint

realism
remarriage
Ideologies
present
Realist
Realism
time
Split
Counsel
Ideology
Enemy
Unity
Political Thought
Remarriage
Canon

Keywords

  • feasibility
  • ideology
  • political realism
  • practice
  • Realism
  • realist theory
  • traditions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Introduction. / Sabl, Andrew; Sagar, Rahul.

In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 3, 04.05.2017, p. 269-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

@article{9847aefff7684e44a421ae0dddbb35c0,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "The realist movement in political thought has until recently been defined as much by its enemies as by its theses. It has often spent more time explaining what was wrong with ideal theory than doing realist theory. This essay argues that realism is entering a new phase, constructive rather than combative. It identifies three modes of constructive or affirmative realist theory (present in this volume’s essays and elsewhere). The first focuses on feasibility; the second revisits the realist canon; and the third shows how familiar ideologies can be defended without appealing to the abstract or abstruse philosophical claims on which they are often sought to rely. The essay does not seek unity where none can be found. It counsels accepting that the family surnamed Realism is a large and nontraditional one in which splits and remarriages are not unknown and many prospective partners raise eyebrows.",
keywords = "feasibility, ideology, political realism, practice, Realism, realist theory, traditions",
author = "Andrew Sabl and Rahul Sagar",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13698230.2017.1293335",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "269--275",
journal = "Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)",
issn = "1369-8230",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction

AU - Sabl, Andrew

AU - Sagar, Rahul

PY - 2017/5/4

Y1 - 2017/5/4

N2 - The realist movement in political thought has until recently been defined as much by its enemies as by its theses. It has often spent more time explaining what was wrong with ideal theory than doing realist theory. This essay argues that realism is entering a new phase, constructive rather than combative. It identifies three modes of constructive or affirmative realist theory (present in this volume’s essays and elsewhere). The first focuses on feasibility; the second revisits the realist canon; and the third shows how familiar ideologies can be defended without appealing to the abstract or abstruse philosophical claims on which they are often sought to rely. The essay does not seek unity where none can be found. It counsels accepting that the family surnamed Realism is a large and nontraditional one in which splits and remarriages are not unknown and many prospective partners raise eyebrows.

AB - The realist movement in political thought has until recently been defined as much by its enemies as by its theses. It has often spent more time explaining what was wrong with ideal theory than doing realist theory. This essay argues that realism is entering a new phase, constructive rather than combative. It identifies three modes of constructive or affirmative realist theory (present in this volume’s essays and elsewhere). The first focuses on feasibility; the second revisits the realist canon; and the third shows how familiar ideologies can be defended without appealing to the abstract or abstruse philosophical claims on which they are often sought to rely. The essay does not seek unity where none can be found. It counsels accepting that the family surnamed Realism is a large and nontraditional one in which splits and remarriages are not unknown and many prospective partners raise eyebrows.

KW - feasibility

KW - ideology

KW - political realism

KW - practice

KW - Realism

KW - realist theory

KW - traditions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016796416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016796416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13698230.2017.1293335

DO - 10.1080/13698230.2017.1293335

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85016796416

VL - 20

SP - 269

EP - 275

JO - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)

JF - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)

SN - 1369-8230

IS - 3

ER -