Introducing gender to the critique of privatized public space

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Urban design scholars denounce the recent trend towards the privatization of US public space. Critics emphasize the negative consequences of privatized public space, tied to private ownership, an emphasis on consumption, leisure and security, a targeted audience, and controlled behaviour and design. Yet these key qualities of privatized public spaces have meaning only in the context of one's identity. The same qualities shape experiences of privatized public spaces that can be understood as constrained, as constraining or as a form of resistance, depending on one's gender, race, class and sexuality. This paper challenges the prevailing design critique by examining women's experience of privatized public spaces, drawing on interviews with 43 middle-class women and behavioural mapping in five privatized public spaces in Orange County, California. Recommendations address changes to research and practice to better reflect and accommodate diverse experiences of public space.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-178
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Urban Design
Volume4
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

public space
gender
experience
sexuality
urban design
Public Space
privatization
ownership
middle class
critic
trend
interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Introducing gender to the critique of privatized public space. / Day, K.

In: Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1999, p. 155-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f1f62f90cab446f86fdb8e1fce803d2,
title = "Introducing gender to the critique of privatized public space",
abstract = "Urban design scholars denounce the recent trend towards the privatization of US public space. Critics emphasize the negative consequences of privatized public space, tied to private ownership, an emphasis on consumption, leisure and security, a targeted audience, and controlled behaviour and design. Yet these key qualities of privatized public spaces have meaning only in the context of one's identity. The same qualities shape experiences of privatized public spaces that can be understood as constrained, as constraining or as a form of resistance, depending on one's gender, race, class and sexuality. This paper challenges the prevailing design critique by examining women's experience of privatized public spaces, drawing on interviews with 43 middle-class women and behavioural mapping in five privatized public spaces in Orange County, California. Recommendations address changes to research and practice to better reflect and accommodate diverse experiences of public space.",
author = "K. Day",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "155--178",
journal = "Journal of Urban Design",
issn = "1357-4809",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing gender to the critique of privatized public space

AU - Day, K.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Urban design scholars denounce the recent trend towards the privatization of US public space. Critics emphasize the negative consequences of privatized public space, tied to private ownership, an emphasis on consumption, leisure and security, a targeted audience, and controlled behaviour and design. Yet these key qualities of privatized public spaces have meaning only in the context of one's identity. The same qualities shape experiences of privatized public spaces that can be understood as constrained, as constraining or as a form of resistance, depending on one's gender, race, class and sexuality. This paper challenges the prevailing design critique by examining women's experience of privatized public spaces, drawing on interviews with 43 middle-class women and behavioural mapping in five privatized public spaces in Orange County, California. Recommendations address changes to research and practice to better reflect and accommodate diverse experiences of public space.

AB - Urban design scholars denounce the recent trend towards the privatization of US public space. Critics emphasize the negative consequences of privatized public space, tied to private ownership, an emphasis on consumption, leisure and security, a targeted audience, and controlled behaviour and design. Yet these key qualities of privatized public spaces have meaning only in the context of one's identity. The same qualities shape experiences of privatized public spaces that can be understood as constrained, as constraining or as a form of resistance, depending on one's gender, race, class and sexuality. This paper challenges the prevailing design critique by examining women's experience of privatized public spaces, drawing on interviews with 43 middle-class women and behavioural mapping in five privatized public spaces in Orange County, California. Recommendations address changes to research and practice to better reflect and accommodate diverse experiences of public space.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032780787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032780787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 155

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Urban Design

JF - Journal of Urban Design

SN - 1357-4809

IS - 2

ER -