Interpretation of verb phrase anaphora

influences of task and syntactic context.

Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When listeners hear a sentence like "Will Carey do it?" they must find an interpretation of the phrase "do it", which is an anaphor replacing a full verb phrase (VP). To accomplish this task, listeners may use two sources of information: finding a recent VP that is syntactically appropriate, or using pragmatics to find a recent discourse event that plausibly completes the sentence. One theory of anaphor comprehension says that listeners use both sources of information in a competition for the best antecedent. Another theory says that listeners use only one of those sources, depending on the syntactic class of anaphor. Two experiments are reported, one using a reading time technique and one a sensicality judgement task. The experiments varied the distance of the antecedent from the anaphor, the material that intervened between the antecedent and anaphor, and the syntactic class of the anaphor. In the reading task, the results followed the predictions of the two-source competition theory, as a number of effects were observed, but none of them depended on the anaphor's syntactic class. In the judgement task, however, the type of anaphor did influence judgement time. The overall results suggest that there are important differences between simple comprehension tasks and metalinguistic judgements, and that past empirical conflicts may be explicable on this basis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-692
Number of pages18
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology
Volume42
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 1990

Fingerprint

Reading
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Interpretation of verb phrase anaphora : influences of task and syntactic context. / Murphy, Gregory.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 4, 11.1990, p. 675-692.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c1458b40b8a4960aecde5b2ad423720,
title = "Interpretation of verb phrase anaphora: influences of task and syntactic context.",
abstract = "When listeners hear a sentence like {"}Will Carey do it?{"} they must find an interpretation of the phrase {"}do it{"}, which is an anaphor replacing a full verb phrase (VP). To accomplish this task, listeners may use two sources of information: finding a recent VP that is syntactically appropriate, or using pragmatics to find a recent discourse event that plausibly completes the sentence. One theory of anaphor comprehension says that listeners use both sources of information in a competition for the best antecedent. Another theory says that listeners use only one of those sources, depending on the syntactic class of anaphor. Two experiments are reported, one using a reading time technique and one a sensicality judgement task. The experiments varied the distance of the antecedent from the anaphor, the material that intervened between the antecedent and anaphor, and the syntactic class of the anaphor. In the reading task, the results followed the predictions of the two-source competition theory, as a number of effects were observed, but none of them depended on the anaphor's syntactic class. In the judgement task, however, the type of anaphor did influence judgement time. The overall results suggest that there are important differences between simple comprehension tasks and metalinguistic judgements, and that past empirical conflicts may be explicable on this basis.",
author = "Gregory Murphy",
year = "1990",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "675--692",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4987",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation of verb phrase anaphora

T2 - influences of task and syntactic context.

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 1990/11

Y1 - 1990/11

N2 - When listeners hear a sentence like "Will Carey do it?" they must find an interpretation of the phrase "do it", which is an anaphor replacing a full verb phrase (VP). To accomplish this task, listeners may use two sources of information: finding a recent VP that is syntactically appropriate, or using pragmatics to find a recent discourse event that plausibly completes the sentence. One theory of anaphor comprehension says that listeners use both sources of information in a competition for the best antecedent. Another theory says that listeners use only one of those sources, depending on the syntactic class of anaphor. Two experiments are reported, one using a reading time technique and one a sensicality judgement task. The experiments varied the distance of the antecedent from the anaphor, the material that intervened between the antecedent and anaphor, and the syntactic class of the anaphor. In the reading task, the results followed the predictions of the two-source competition theory, as a number of effects were observed, but none of them depended on the anaphor's syntactic class. In the judgement task, however, the type of anaphor did influence judgement time. The overall results suggest that there are important differences between simple comprehension tasks and metalinguistic judgements, and that past empirical conflicts may be explicable on this basis.

AB - When listeners hear a sentence like "Will Carey do it?" they must find an interpretation of the phrase "do it", which is an anaphor replacing a full verb phrase (VP). To accomplish this task, listeners may use two sources of information: finding a recent VP that is syntactically appropriate, or using pragmatics to find a recent discourse event that plausibly completes the sentence. One theory of anaphor comprehension says that listeners use both sources of information in a competition for the best antecedent. Another theory says that listeners use only one of those sources, depending on the syntactic class of anaphor. Two experiments are reported, one using a reading time technique and one a sensicality judgement task. The experiments varied the distance of the antecedent from the anaphor, the material that intervened between the antecedent and anaphor, and the syntactic class of the anaphor. In the reading task, the results followed the predictions of the two-source competition theory, as a number of effects were observed, but none of them depended on the anaphor's syntactic class. In the judgement task, however, the type of anaphor did influence judgement time. The overall results suggest that there are important differences between simple comprehension tasks and metalinguistic judgements, and that past empirical conflicts may be explicable on this basis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025515930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025515930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 675

EP - 692

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

SN - 0272-4987

IS - 4

ER -