Interpolating sampled contours in 3-D

Analyses of variability and bias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined how observers interpolated the missing parts of sampled, planar contours in 3-D space. We varied (1) contour type (linear or parabolic), (2) orientation of the plane containing the contour and (3) the number of points on a sampled contour. Interpolation performance was very accurate, comparable to results from Vernier tasks. Setting variability was highest along the line of sight and for the parabolic contour. Setting variability did not decrease with increasing number of points on either contour, suggesting that observers do not use all available, relevant information in this task.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2431-2446
Number of pages16
JournalVision Research
Volume42
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2002

Keywords

  • Contour
  • Contour interpolation
  • Localization
  • Vernier acuity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Interpolating sampled contours in 3-D : Analyses of variability and bias. / Warren, Paul A.; Maloney, Laurence T.; Landy, Michael S.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 42, No. 21, 09.2002, p. 2431-2446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68f83f6590da42eabd3324dd3f5c9307,
title = "Interpolating sampled contours in 3-D: Analyses of variability and bias",
abstract = "In two experiments, we examined how observers interpolated the missing parts of sampled, planar contours in 3-D space. We varied (1) contour type (linear or parabolic), (2) orientation of the plane containing the contour and (3) the number of points on a sampled contour. Interpolation performance was very accurate, comparable to results from Vernier tasks. Setting variability was highest along the line of sight and for the parabolic contour. Setting variability did not decrease with increasing number of points on either contour, suggesting that observers do not use all available, relevant information in this task.",
keywords = "Contour, Contour interpolation, Localization, Vernier acuity",
author = "Warren, {Paul A.} and Maloney, {Laurence T.} and Landy, {Michael S.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00266-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "2431--2446",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpolating sampled contours in 3-D

T2 - Analyses of variability and bias

AU - Warren, Paul A.

AU - Maloney, Laurence T.

AU - Landy, Michael S.

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - In two experiments, we examined how observers interpolated the missing parts of sampled, planar contours in 3-D space. We varied (1) contour type (linear or parabolic), (2) orientation of the plane containing the contour and (3) the number of points on a sampled contour. Interpolation performance was very accurate, comparable to results from Vernier tasks. Setting variability was highest along the line of sight and for the parabolic contour. Setting variability did not decrease with increasing number of points on either contour, suggesting that observers do not use all available, relevant information in this task.

AB - In two experiments, we examined how observers interpolated the missing parts of sampled, planar contours in 3-D space. We varied (1) contour type (linear or parabolic), (2) orientation of the plane containing the contour and (3) the number of points on a sampled contour. Interpolation performance was very accurate, comparable to results from Vernier tasks. Setting variability was highest along the line of sight and for the parabolic contour. Setting variability did not decrease with increasing number of points on either contour, suggesting that observers do not use all available, relevant information in this task.

KW - Contour

KW - Contour interpolation

KW - Localization

KW - Vernier acuity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036753728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036753728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00266-3

DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00266-3

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 2431

EP - 2446

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 21

ER -