Interobserver error involved in independent attempts to measure cusp base areas of Pan M1s

Shara Bailey, Varsha C. Pilbrow, Bernard A. Wood

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Cusp base areas measured from digitized images increase the amount of detailed quantitative information one can collect from post-canine crown morphology. Although this method is gaining wide usage for taxonomic analyses of extant and extinct hominoids, the techniques for digitizing images and taking measurements differ between researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver error in order to help assess the reliability of cusp base area measurement within extant and extinct hominoid taxa. Two of the authors measured individual cusp base areas and total cusp base area of 23 maxillary first molars (M1) of Pan. From these, relative cusp base areas were calculated. No statistically significant interobserver differences were found for either absolute or relative cusp base areas. On average the hypocone and paracone showed the least interobserver error (< 1 %) whereas the protocone and metacone showed the most (2.6-4.5%). We suggest that the larger measurement error in the metacone/protocone is due primarily to either weakly defined fissure patterns and/or the presence of accessory occlusal features. Overall, levels of interobserver error are similar to those found for intraobserver error. The results of our study suggest that if certain prescribed standards are employed then cusp and crown base areas measured by different individuals can be pooled into a single database.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)323-331
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Anatomy
    Volume205
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 2004

    Fingerprint

    Crowns
    Hominidae
    fissure
    Canidae
    Research Personnel
    Databases
    researchers
    dogs
    methodology
    method
    digitising

    Keywords

    • Dental morphometrics
    • Digital imaging
    • Error estimates
    • Maxillary molars
    • Quantitative analysis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anatomy
    • Histology
    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Molecular Biology
    • Developmental Biology
    • Cell Biology

    Cite this

    Interobserver error involved in independent attempts to measure cusp base areas of Pan M1s. / Bailey, Shara; Pilbrow, Varsha C.; Wood, Bernard A.

    In: Journal of Anatomy, Vol. 205, No. 4, 10.2004, p. 323-331.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bailey, Shara ; Pilbrow, Varsha C. ; Wood, Bernard A. / Interobserver error involved in independent attempts to measure cusp base areas of Pan M1s. In: Journal of Anatomy. 2004 ; Vol. 205, No. 4. pp. 323-331.
    @article{bfdde391f9484406969f54b514e38690,
    title = "Interobserver error involved in independent attempts to measure cusp base areas of Pan M1s",
    abstract = "Cusp base areas measured from digitized images increase the amount of detailed quantitative information one can collect from post-canine crown morphology. Although this method is gaining wide usage for taxonomic analyses of extant and extinct hominoids, the techniques for digitizing images and taking measurements differ between researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver error in order to help assess the reliability of cusp base area measurement within extant and extinct hominoid taxa. Two of the authors measured individual cusp base areas and total cusp base area of 23 maxillary first molars (M1) of Pan. From these, relative cusp base areas were calculated. No statistically significant interobserver differences were found for either absolute or relative cusp base areas. On average the hypocone and paracone showed the least interobserver error (< 1 {\%}) whereas the protocone and metacone showed the most (2.6-4.5{\%}). We suggest that the larger measurement error in the metacone/protocone is due primarily to either weakly defined fissure patterns and/or the presence of accessory occlusal features. Overall, levels of interobserver error are similar to those found for intraobserver error. The results of our study suggest that if certain prescribed standards are employed then cusp and crown base areas measured by different individuals can be pooled into a single database.",
    keywords = "Dental morphometrics, Digital imaging, Error estimates, Maxillary molars, Quantitative analysis",
    author = "Shara Bailey and Pilbrow, {Varsha C.} and Wood, {Bernard A.}",
    year = "2004",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00334.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "205",
    pages = "323--331",
    journal = "Journal of Anatomy",
    issn = "0021-8782",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Interobserver error involved in independent attempts to measure cusp base areas of Pan M1s

    AU - Bailey, Shara

    AU - Pilbrow, Varsha C.

    AU - Wood, Bernard A.

    PY - 2004/10

    Y1 - 2004/10

    N2 - Cusp base areas measured from digitized images increase the amount of detailed quantitative information one can collect from post-canine crown morphology. Although this method is gaining wide usage for taxonomic analyses of extant and extinct hominoids, the techniques for digitizing images and taking measurements differ between researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver error in order to help assess the reliability of cusp base area measurement within extant and extinct hominoid taxa. Two of the authors measured individual cusp base areas and total cusp base area of 23 maxillary first molars (M1) of Pan. From these, relative cusp base areas were calculated. No statistically significant interobserver differences were found for either absolute or relative cusp base areas. On average the hypocone and paracone showed the least interobserver error (< 1 %) whereas the protocone and metacone showed the most (2.6-4.5%). We suggest that the larger measurement error in the metacone/protocone is due primarily to either weakly defined fissure patterns and/or the presence of accessory occlusal features. Overall, levels of interobserver error are similar to those found for intraobserver error. The results of our study suggest that if certain prescribed standards are employed then cusp and crown base areas measured by different individuals can be pooled into a single database.

    AB - Cusp base areas measured from digitized images increase the amount of detailed quantitative information one can collect from post-canine crown morphology. Although this method is gaining wide usage for taxonomic analyses of extant and extinct hominoids, the techniques for digitizing images and taking measurements differ between researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver error in order to help assess the reliability of cusp base area measurement within extant and extinct hominoid taxa. Two of the authors measured individual cusp base areas and total cusp base area of 23 maxillary first molars (M1) of Pan. From these, relative cusp base areas were calculated. No statistically significant interobserver differences were found for either absolute or relative cusp base areas. On average the hypocone and paracone showed the least interobserver error (< 1 %) whereas the protocone and metacone showed the most (2.6-4.5%). We suggest that the larger measurement error in the metacone/protocone is due primarily to either weakly defined fissure patterns and/or the presence of accessory occlusal features. Overall, levels of interobserver error are similar to those found for intraobserver error. The results of our study suggest that if certain prescribed standards are employed then cusp and crown base areas measured by different individuals can be pooled into a single database.

    KW - Dental morphometrics

    KW - Digital imaging

    KW - Error estimates

    KW - Maxillary molars

    KW - Quantitative analysis

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6444224775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=6444224775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00334.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00334.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 205

    SP - 323

    EP - 331

    JO - Journal of Anatomy

    JF - Journal of Anatomy

    SN - 0021-8782

    IS - 4

    ER -