Perspectives internationales sur la diversité linguistique et sur les droits linguistiques

Translated title of the contribution: International perspectives on linguistic diversity and language rights

Gregory Guy

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    Abstract

    The current debate in the United States over official language policy has precedents in other countries. In the ancient world, all major states and empires were multilingual, as were the major medieval and early modern states. Today many important countries are multilingual. Indeed, the equation "one nation = one language" is a relatively recent invention. Advocates of the officialization of English in the United States argue that the country risks being "torn apart" by multilingualism, but such countries as Australia and the Soviet Union offer models for the successful management, even promotion, of multilingualism. Where language is used to obstruct access to jobs, education, progress, and power, conflict can arise. The answer is to maintain parity, not to impose a single language on all.

    Original languageFrench
    Pages (from-to)45-53
    Number of pages9
    JournalLanguage Problems and Language Planning
    Volume13
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1989

    Fingerprint

    Patents and inventions
    Linguistics
    Education
    multilingualism
    linguistics
    language
    official language
    language policy
    invention
    USSR
    promotion
    management
    education

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Linguistics and Language
    • Communication

    Cite this

    Perspectives internationales sur la diversité linguistique et sur les droits linguistiques. / Guy, Gregory.

    In: Language Problems and Language Planning, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1989, p. 45-53.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    @article{ee7f38938965447ba3d713d46ee62796,
    title = "Perspectives internationales sur la diversit{\'e} linguistique et sur les droits linguistiques",
    abstract = "The current debate in the United States over official language policy has precedents in other countries. In the ancient world, all major states and empires were multilingual, as were the major medieval and early modern states. Today many important countries are multilingual. Indeed, the equation {"}one nation = one language{"} is a relatively recent invention. Advocates of the officialization of English in the United States argue that the country risks being {"}torn apart{"} by multilingualism, but such countries as Australia and the Soviet Union offer models for the successful management, even promotion, of multilingualism. Where language is used to obstruct access to jobs, education, progress, and power, conflict can arise. The answer is to maintain parity, not to impose a single language on all.",
    author = "Gregory Guy",
    year = "1989",
    doi = "10.1075/lplp.13.1.06guy",
    language = "French",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "45--53",
    journal = "Language Problems and Language Planning",
    issn = "0272-2690",
    publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Perspectives internationales sur la diversité linguistique et sur les droits linguistiques

    AU - Guy, Gregory

    PY - 1989

    Y1 - 1989

    N2 - The current debate in the United States over official language policy has precedents in other countries. In the ancient world, all major states and empires were multilingual, as were the major medieval and early modern states. Today many important countries are multilingual. Indeed, the equation "one nation = one language" is a relatively recent invention. Advocates of the officialization of English in the United States argue that the country risks being "torn apart" by multilingualism, but such countries as Australia and the Soviet Union offer models for the successful management, even promotion, of multilingualism. Where language is used to obstruct access to jobs, education, progress, and power, conflict can arise. The answer is to maintain parity, not to impose a single language on all.

    AB - The current debate in the United States over official language policy has precedents in other countries. In the ancient world, all major states and empires were multilingual, as were the major medieval and early modern states. Today many important countries are multilingual. Indeed, the equation "one nation = one language" is a relatively recent invention. Advocates of the officialization of English in the United States argue that the country risks being "torn apart" by multilingualism, but such countries as Australia and the Soviet Union offer models for the successful management, even promotion, of multilingualism. Where language is used to obstruct access to jobs, education, progress, and power, conflict can arise. The answer is to maintain parity, not to impose a single language on all.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947530662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947530662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1075/lplp.13.1.06guy

    DO - 10.1075/lplp.13.1.06guy

    M3 - Comment/debate

    AN - SCOPUS:84947530662

    VL - 13

    SP - 45

    EP - 53

    JO - Language Problems and Language Planning

    JF - Language Problems and Language Planning

    SN - 0272-2690

    IS - 1

    ER -