International Mediation, Selection Effects, and the Question of Bias*

Bernd Beber

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    International mediation of violent conflicts is commonplace in today's world, and so is academic research on its features and effectiveness. But research that speaks to both the initiation and implementation of mediation remains relatively rare. This article outlines a theoretical and empirical argument that contributes to filling this gap and suggests a counterintuitive selection effect: potential mediators that are likely to resolve a dispute are unlikely to select into mediation. The argument hinges on the claim that mediation by biased third parties is relatively ineffective, and I provide qualitative evidence to suggest that this claim is plausible.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)397-424
    Number of pages28
    JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
    Volume29
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2012

    Fingerprint

    mediation
    trend
    Mediation
    Selection effects
    evidence

    Keywords

    • bias
    • conflict management
    • mediation
    • third parties

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    International Mediation, Selection Effects, and the Question of Bias*. / Beber, Bernd.

    In: Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 29, No. 4, 09.2012, p. 397-424.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{9f42b36af36749e491d2508ab74d1e67,
    title = "International Mediation, Selection Effects, and the Question of Bias*",
    abstract = "International mediation of violent conflicts is commonplace in today's world, and so is academic research on its features and effectiveness. But research that speaks to both the initiation and implementation of mediation remains relatively rare. This article outlines a theoretical and empirical argument that contributes to filling this gap and suggests a counterintuitive selection effect: potential mediators that are likely to resolve a dispute are unlikely to select into mediation. The argument hinges on the claim that mediation by biased third parties is relatively ineffective, and I provide qualitative evidence to suggest that this claim is plausible.",
    keywords = "bias, conflict management, mediation, third parties",
    author = "Bernd Beber",
    year = "2012",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1177/0738894212449091",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "397--424",
    journal = "Conflict Management and Peace Science",
    issn = "0738-8942",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - International Mediation, Selection Effects, and the Question of Bias*

    AU - Beber, Bernd

    PY - 2012/9

    Y1 - 2012/9

    N2 - International mediation of violent conflicts is commonplace in today's world, and so is academic research on its features and effectiveness. But research that speaks to both the initiation and implementation of mediation remains relatively rare. This article outlines a theoretical and empirical argument that contributes to filling this gap and suggests a counterintuitive selection effect: potential mediators that are likely to resolve a dispute are unlikely to select into mediation. The argument hinges on the claim that mediation by biased third parties is relatively ineffective, and I provide qualitative evidence to suggest that this claim is plausible.

    AB - International mediation of violent conflicts is commonplace in today's world, and so is academic research on its features and effectiveness. But research that speaks to both the initiation and implementation of mediation remains relatively rare. This article outlines a theoretical and empirical argument that contributes to filling this gap and suggests a counterintuitive selection effect: potential mediators that are likely to resolve a dispute are unlikely to select into mediation. The argument hinges on the claim that mediation by biased third parties is relatively ineffective, and I provide qualitative evidence to suggest that this claim is plausible.

    KW - bias

    KW - conflict management

    KW - mediation

    KW - third parties

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866296137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866296137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0738894212449091

    DO - 10.1177/0738894212449091

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 397

    EP - 424

    JO - Conflict Management and Peace Science

    JF - Conflict Management and Peace Science

    SN - 0738-8942

    IS - 4

    ER -