International comparisons of wealth inequality

abridged form

Edward N. Wolff

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    Abstract

    This study presents reasonably comparable estimates of the size distribution of household or personal wealth for eight OECD countries - Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In the mid-1980s, the U.S. ranked as the most unequal and Japan the least, while the other six countries had roughly comparable levels of wealth inequality. Moreover, while wealth inequality rose sharply in the U.S. during the 1980s, it increased modestly in Sweden and showed little change or a slight decline in Canada, France, and the U.K. A comparison of time trends for the U.K. and the U.S. suggests that the relatively high wealth inequality in the U.S. in the 1980s represents a marked turnaround from the 1950s, when the U.S. was considerably more equal in terms of wealth ownership than the U.K. Comparative results for the two countries hold for both conventional (marketable) wealth and for augmented wealth, which includes a valuation of public and private pension wealth.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationThe political economy of inequality
    EditorsFrank Ackerman, Neva R. Goodwin, Laurie Doughtery, Kevin Gallagher
    Place of PublicationWashington DC
    PublisherIsland Press
    Pages42-44
    StatePublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    Wealth inequality
    International comparison
    Wealth
    Sweden
    France
    Japan
    Canada
    Germany
    Ownership
    Public pensions
    Time trends
    Household
    Private pensions
    OECD countries

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Wolff, E. N. (2000). International comparisons of wealth inequality: abridged form. In F. Ackerman, N. R. Goodwin, L. Doughtery, & K. Gallagher (Eds.), The political economy of inequality (pp. 42-44). Washington DC: Island Press.

    International comparisons of wealth inequality : abridged form. / Wolff, Edward N.

    The political economy of inequality. ed. / Frank Ackerman; Neva R. Goodwin; Laurie Doughtery; Kevin Gallagher. Washington DC : Island Press, 2000. p. 42-44.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    Wolff, EN 2000, International comparisons of wealth inequality: abridged form. in F Ackerman, NR Goodwin, L Doughtery & K Gallagher (eds), The political economy of inequality. Island Press, Washington DC, pp. 42-44.
    Wolff EN. International comparisons of wealth inequality: abridged form. In Ackerman F, Goodwin NR, Doughtery L, Gallagher K, editors, The political economy of inequality. Washington DC: Island Press. 2000. p. 42-44
    Wolff, Edward N. / International comparisons of wealth inequality : abridged form. The political economy of inequality. editor / Frank Ackerman ; Neva R. Goodwin ; Laurie Doughtery ; Kevin Gallagher. Washington DC : Island Press, 2000. pp. 42-44
    @inbook{901f8261c94f41a489275dbf8c274f53,
    title = "International comparisons of wealth inequality: abridged form",
    abstract = "This study presents reasonably comparable estimates of the size distribution of household or personal wealth for eight OECD countries - Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In the mid-1980s, the U.S. ranked as the most unequal and Japan the least, while the other six countries had roughly comparable levels of wealth inequality. Moreover, while wealth inequality rose sharply in the U.S. during the 1980s, it increased modestly in Sweden and showed little change or a slight decline in Canada, France, and the U.K. A comparison of time trends for the U.K. and the U.S. suggests that the relatively high wealth inequality in the U.S. in the 1980s represents a marked turnaround from the 1950s, when the U.S. was considerably more equal in terms of wealth ownership than the U.K. Comparative results for the two countries hold for both conventional (marketable) wealth and for augmented wealth, which includes a valuation of public and private pension wealth.",
    author = "Wolff, {Edward N.}",
    year = "2000",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "42--44",
    editor = "Ackerman, {Frank } and Goodwin, {Neva R. } and Doughtery, {Laurie } and Kevin Gallagher",
    booktitle = "The political economy of inequality",
    publisher = "Island Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - International comparisons of wealth inequality

    T2 - abridged form

    AU - Wolff, Edward N.

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - This study presents reasonably comparable estimates of the size distribution of household or personal wealth for eight OECD countries - Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In the mid-1980s, the U.S. ranked as the most unequal and Japan the least, while the other six countries had roughly comparable levels of wealth inequality. Moreover, while wealth inequality rose sharply in the U.S. during the 1980s, it increased modestly in Sweden and showed little change or a slight decline in Canada, France, and the U.K. A comparison of time trends for the U.K. and the U.S. suggests that the relatively high wealth inequality in the U.S. in the 1980s represents a marked turnaround from the 1950s, when the U.S. was considerably more equal in terms of wealth ownership than the U.K. Comparative results for the two countries hold for both conventional (marketable) wealth and for augmented wealth, which includes a valuation of public and private pension wealth.

    AB - This study presents reasonably comparable estimates of the size distribution of household or personal wealth for eight OECD countries - Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In the mid-1980s, the U.S. ranked as the most unequal and Japan the least, while the other six countries had roughly comparable levels of wealth inequality. Moreover, while wealth inequality rose sharply in the U.S. during the 1980s, it increased modestly in Sweden and showed little change or a slight decline in Canada, France, and the U.K. A comparison of time trends for the U.K. and the U.S. suggests that the relatively high wealth inequality in the U.S. in the 1980s represents a marked turnaround from the 1950s, when the U.S. was considerably more equal in terms of wealth ownership than the U.K. Comparative results for the two countries hold for both conventional (marketable) wealth and for augmented wealth, which includes a valuation of public and private pension wealth.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038877838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038877838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

    SP - 42

    EP - 44

    BT - The political economy of inequality

    A2 - Ackerman, Frank

    A2 - Goodwin, Neva R.

    A2 - Doughtery, Laurie

    A2 - Gallagher, Kevin

    PB - Island Press

    CY - Washington DC

    ER -