Interactive music systems in ensemble performance

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Interactive music systems change their behavior in response to musical input (Rowe, 1993). They can be used to accompany human players performing fully notated scores in a way that is sensitive to the soloist’s timing and expression, as well as to improvise along with other humans or programs. The articulation of artificially intelligent applications often includes a description of the knowledge level the task involves. “The knowledge level abstracts completely from the internal processing and the internal representation. Thus, all that is left is the content of the representations and the goals toward which that content will be used.�? (Newell, 1990, pp. 48-49). The content of the representations and the goals of interactive music systems are roughly equivalent to human musicianship. As such they encompass a particularly daunting scope. My argument in this chapter will be that even a little bit of musicianship can make computer programs engaging partners for a variety of applications and compelling members of performing and improvising ensembles. In other words, not all musicianship has to be encoded to make these systems useful, and many incremental improvements are available to take them beyond the level they have already reached. Before discussing the organization and implementation of musically aware interactive music systems, let us first review some of their main features and those tools that are widely used in designing them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationReadings in Music and Artificial Intelligence
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages145-161
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781136652783
ISBN (Print)9057550946, 9789057550942
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Interactive music Systems
Ensemble
Musicianship
Articulation
Soloist
Players

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Rowe, R. (2013). Interactive music systems in ensemble performance. In Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 145-161). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203059746-13

Interactive music systems in ensemble performance. / Rowe, Robert.

Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence. Taylor and Francis, 2013. p. 145-161.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rowe, R 2013, Interactive music systems in ensemble performance. in Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence. Taylor and Francis, pp. 145-161. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203059746-13
Rowe R. Interactive music systems in ensemble performance. In Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence. Taylor and Francis. 2013. p. 145-161 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203059746-13
Rowe, Robert. / Interactive music systems in ensemble performance. Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence. Taylor and Francis, 2013. pp. 145-161
@inbook{bc22abb180374e1dbaf06c2b1a202c4c,
title = "Interactive music systems in ensemble performance",
abstract = "Interactive music systems change their behavior in response to musical input (Rowe, 1993). They can be used to accompany human players performing fully notated scores in a way that is sensitive to the soloist’s timing and expression, as well as to improvise along with other humans or programs. The articulation of artificially intelligent applications often includes a description of the knowledge level the task involves. “The knowledge level abstracts completely from the internal processing and the internal representation. Thus, all that is left is the content of the representations and the goals toward which that content will be used.�? (Newell, 1990, pp. 48-49). The content of the representations and the goals of interactive music systems are roughly equivalent to human musicianship. As such they encompass a particularly daunting scope. My argument in this chapter will be that even a little bit of musicianship can make computer programs engaging partners for a variety of applications and compelling members of performing and improvising ensembles. In other words, not all musicianship has to be encoded to make these systems useful, and many incremental improvements are available to take them beyond the level they have already reached. Before discussing the organization and implementation of musically aware interactive music systems, let us first review some of their main features and those tools that are widely used in designing them.",
author = "Robert Rowe",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203059746-13",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9057550946",
pages = "145--161",
booktitle = "Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Interactive music systems in ensemble performance

AU - Rowe, Robert

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Interactive music systems change their behavior in response to musical input (Rowe, 1993). They can be used to accompany human players performing fully notated scores in a way that is sensitive to the soloist’s timing and expression, as well as to improvise along with other humans or programs. The articulation of artificially intelligent applications often includes a description of the knowledge level the task involves. “The knowledge level abstracts completely from the internal processing and the internal representation. Thus, all that is left is the content of the representations and the goals toward which that content will be used.�? (Newell, 1990, pp. 48-49). The content of the representations and the goals of interactive music systems are roughly equivalent to human musicianship. As such they encompass a particularly daunting scope. My argument in this chapter will be that even a little bit of musicianship can make computer programs engaging partners for a variety of applications and compelling members of performing and improvising ensembles. In other words, not all musicianship has to be encoded to make these systems useful, and many incremental improvements are available to take them beyond the level they have already reached. Before discussing the organization and implementation of musically aware interactive music systems, let us first review some of their main features and those tools that are widely used in designing them.

AB - Interactive music systems change their behavior in response to musical input (Rowe, 1993). They can be used to accompany human players performing fully notated scores in a way that is sensitive to the soloist’s timing and expression, as well as to improvise along with other humans or programs. The articulation of artificially intelligent applications often includes a description of the knowledge level the task involves. “The knowledge level abstracts completely from the internal processing and the internal representation. Thus, all that is left is the content of the representations and the goals toward which that content will be used.�? (Newell, 1990, pp. 48-49). The content of the representations and the goals of interactive music systems are roughly equivalent to human musicianship. As such they encompass a particularly daunting scope. My argument in this chapter will be that even a little bit of musicianship can make computer programs engaging partners for a variety of applications and compelling members of performing and improvising ensembles. In other words, not all musicianship has to be encoded to make these systems useful, and many incremental improvements are available to take them beyond the level they have already reached. Before discussing the organization and implementation of musically aware interactive music systems, let us first review some of their main features and those tools that are widely used in designing them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070642537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070642537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203059746-13

DO - 10.4324/9780203059746-13

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85070642537

SN - 9057550946

SN - 9789057550942

SP - 145

EP - 161

BT - Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -