Intentional Sin and Accidental Virtue? Cultural Differences in Moral Systems Influence Perceived Intentionality

Cory J. Clark, Christopher W. Bauman, Shanmukh V. Kamble, Eric D. Knowles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Indians and U.S. Americans view harmful actions as morally wrong, but Indians are more likely than U.S. Americans to perceive helping behaviors as moral imperatives. We utilize this cultural variability in moral belief systems to test whether and how moral considerations influence perceptions of intentionality (as suggested by theories of folk psychology). Four experiments found that Indians attribute more intentionality than U.S. Americans for helpful but not harmful (Studies 1–4) or neutral side effects (Studies 2 and 3). Also, cross-cultural differences in intentionality judgments for positive actions reflect stronger praise motives (Study 3), and stronger devotion to religious beliefs and practices among Hindus (Study 4). These results provide the first direct support for the claim that features of moral belief systems influence folk psychology, and further suggest that the influence is not inherently asymmetrical; motivation to either blame or praise can influence judgments of intentionality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-82
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Helping Behavior
Psychology
North American Indians
Religion
Motivation
Moral Status

Keywords

  • attribution
  • cross-cultural differences
  • intentionality
  • morality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Intentional Sin and Accidental Virtue? Cultural Differences in Moral Systems Influence Perceived Intentionality. / Clark, Cory J.; Bauman, Christopher W.; Kamble, Shanmukh V.; Knowles, Eric D.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 74-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a876ce1d307943ba8808a72b4359b222,
title = "Intentional Sin and Accidental Virtue? Cultural Differences in Moral Systems Influence Perceived Intentionality",
abstract = "Indians and U.S. Americans view harmful actions as morally wrong, but Indians are more likely than U.S. Americans to perceive helping behaviors as moral imperatives. We utilize this cultural variability in moral belief systems to test whether and how moral considerations influence perceptions of intentionality (as suggested by theories of folk psychology). Four experiments found that Indians attribute more intentionality than U.S. Americans for helpful but not harmful (Studies 1–4) or neutral side effects (Studies 2 and 3). Also, cross-cultural differences in intentionality judgments for positive actions reflect stronger praise motives (Study 3), and stronger devotion to religious beliefs and practices among Hindus (Study 4). These results provide the first direct support for the claim that features of moral belief systems influence folk psychology, and further suggest that the influence is not inherently asymmetrical; motivation to either blame or praise can influence judgments of intentionality.",
keywords = "attribution, cross-cultural differences, intentionality, morality",
author = "Clark, {Cory J.} and Bauman, {Christopher W.} and Kamble, {Shanmukh V.} and Knowles, {Eric D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1948550616663802",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "74--82",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intentional Sin and Accidental Virtue? Cultural Differences in Moral Systems Influence Perceived Intentionality

AU - Clark, Cory J.

AU - Bauman, Christopher W.

AU - Kamble, Shanmukh V.

AU - Knowles, Eric D.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Indians and U.S. Americans view harmful actions as morally wrong, but Indians are more likely than U.S. Americans to perceive helping behaviors as moral imperatives. We utilize this cultural variability in moral belief systems to test whether and how moral considerations influence perceptions of intentionality (as suggested by theories of folk psychology). Four experiments found that Indians attribute more intentionality than U.S. Americans for helpful but not harmful (Studies 1–4) or neutral side effects (Studies 2 and 3). Also, cross-cultural differences in intentionality judgments for positive actions reflect stronger praise motives (Study 3), and stronger devotion to religious beliefs and practices among Hindus (Study 4). These results provide the first direct support for the claim that features of moral belief systems influence folk psychology, and further suggest that the influence is not inherently asymmetrical; motivation to either blame or praise can influence judgments of intentionality.

AB - Indians and U.S. Americans view harmful actions as morally wrong, but Indians are more likely than U.S. Americans to perceive helping behaviors as moral imperatives. We utilize this cultural variability in moral belief systems to test whether and how moral considerations influence perceptions of intentionality (as suggested by theories of folk psychology). Four experiments found that Indians attribute more intentionality than U.S. Americans for helpful but not harmful (Studies 1–4) or neutral side effects (Studies 2 and 3). Also, cross-cultural differences in intentionality judgments for positive actions reflect stronger praise motives (Study 3), and stronger devotion to religious beliefs and practices among Hindus (Study 4). These results provide the first direct support for the claim that features of moral belief systems influence folk psychology, and further suggest that the influence is not inherently asymmetrical; motivation to either blame or praise can influence judgments of intentionality.

KW - attribution

KW - cross-cultural differences

KW - intentionality

KW - morality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008245193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008245193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550616663802

DO - 10.1177/1948550616663802

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85008245193

VL - 8

SP - 74

EP - 82

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 1

ER -