Intensional and extensional analogy items

Differences in performance as a function of academic major and sex

Roger Chaffin, Leslie Peirce, Isaac Bejar

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Is there a relationship between academic field and ability to use different types of semantic relation? Performance on two types of analogy item in the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) General Test was compared. Intensional relations are inherent in the meanings of the words and are based on shared or contrasting properties (e. g. farmer:person, breeze:gale, alive: dead, beggar: poor). Extensional relations reflect empirical relations between things in the world and are based on contiguity or causality (e. g.farmer:tractor, road:sidewalk, flu:headache). Performance on the two kinds of analogy items was compared for a single administration of the GRE for English and History majors (verbal group, n = 2238) and electrical engineering, computer science, and mathematics majors (practical group, n = 2143). The verbal group did better on intensional, and the practical group did better on extensional analogies. The difference was not explained by a correlated gender difference by which women did better on intensional and men did better on extensional items. Thus differences in the ability to use intensional and extensional relations was related to academic training, although the direction of this relationship was not established.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)461-470
    Number of pages10
    JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
    Volume4
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1990

    Fingerprint

    Educational Measurement
    Aptitude
    Mathematics
    Semantics
    Causality
    Headache
    Teaching
    History
    Farmers
    Extensional
    Intensional

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    Intensional and extensional analogy items : Differences in performance as a function of academic major and sex. / Chaffin, Roger; Peirce, Leslie; Bejar, Isaac.

    In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 6, 1990, p. 461-470.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Chaffin, Roger ; Peirce, Leslie ; Bejar, Isaac. / Intensional and extensional analogy items : Differences in performance as a function of academic major and sex. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1990 ; Vol. 4, No. 6. pp. 461-470.
    @article{2c21450ff1074e36a7f2a02b7d18c69e,
    title = "Intensional and extensional analogy items: Differences in performance as a function of academic major and sex",
    abstract = "Is there a relationship between academic field and ability to use different types of semantic relation? Performance on two types of analogy item in the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) General Test was compared. Intensional relations are inherent in the meanings of the words and are based on shared or contrasting properties (e. g. farmer:person, breeze:gale, alive: dead, beggar: poor). Extensional relations reflect empirical relations between things in the world and are based on contiguity or causality (e. g.farmer:tractor, road:sidewalk, flu:headache). Performance on the two kinds of analogy items was compared for a single administration of the GRE for English and History majors (verbal group, n = 2238) and electrical engineering, computer science, and mathematics majors (practical group, n = 2143). The verbal group did better on intensional, and the practical group did better on extensional analogies. The difference was not explained by a correlated gender difference by which women did better on intensional and men did better on extensional items. Thus differences in the ability to use intensional and extensional relations was related to academic training, although the direction of this relationship was not established.",
    author = "Roger Chaffin and Leslie Peirce and Isaac Bejar",
    year = "1990",
    doi = "10.1002/acp.2350040605",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "461--470",
    journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
    issn = "0888-4080",
    publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Intensional and extensional analogy items

    T2 - Differences in performance as a function of academic major and sex

    AU - Chaffin, Roger

    AU - Peirce, Leslie

    AU - Bejar, Isaac

    PY - 1990

    Y1 - 1990

    N2 - Is there a relationship between academic field and ability to use different types of semantic relation? Performance on two types of analogy item in the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) General Test was compared. Intensional relations are inherent in the meanings of the words and are based on shared or contrasting properties (e. g. farmer:person, breeze:gale, alive: dead, beggar: poor). Extensional relations reflect empirical relations between things in the world and are based on contiguity or causality (e. g.farmer:tractor, road:sidewalk, flu:headache). Performance on the two kinds of analogy items was compared for a single administration of the GRE for English and History majors (verbal group, n = 2238) and electrical engineering, computer science, and mathematics majors (practical group, n = 2143). The verbal group did better on intensional, and the practical group did better on extensional analogies. The difference was not explained by a correlated gender difference by which women did better on intensional and men did better on extensional items. Thus differences in the ability to use intensional and extensional relations was related to academic training, although the direction of this relationship was not established.

    AB - Is there a relationship between academic field and ability to use different types of semantic relation? Performance on two types of analogy item in the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) General Test was compared. Intensional relations are inherent in the meanings of the words and are based on shared or contrasting properties (e. g. farmer:person, breeze:gale, alive: dead, beggar: poor). Extensional relations reflect empirical relations between things in the world and are based on contiguity or causality (e. g.farmer:tractor, road:sidewalk, flu:headache). Performance on the two kinds of analogy items was compared for a single administration of the GRE for English and History majors (verbal group, n = 2238) and electrical engineering, computer science, and mathematics majors (practical group, n = 2143). The verbal group did better on intensional, and the practical group did better on extensional analogies. The difference was not explained by a correlated gender difference by which women did better on intensional and men did better on extensional items. Thus differences in the ability to use intensional and extensional relations was related to academic training, although the direction of this relationship was not established.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984119420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984119420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/acp.2350040605

    DO - 10.1002/acp.2350040605

    M3 - Article

    VL - 4

    SP - 461

    EP - 470

    JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

    JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

    SN - 0888-4080

    IS - 6

    ER -