Integrative Review of Recruitment of Research Participants Through Facebook

Louise Reagan, Sarah Y. Nowlin, Stacia B. Birdsall, Juliana Gabbay, Allison Vorderstrasse, Constance Johnson, Gail D'Eramo Melkus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facebook (FB) has been widely used recently to recruit participants for adult health research. However, little is known about its effectiveness, cost, and the characteristics of participants recruited via FB when compared to other recruitment methods. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this integrative review was to examine the published evidence concerning the use of FB in participant recruitment for adult health research, as compared to other social media, online, and traditional recruitment methods. METHODS: In this integrative review, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were the electronic databases used to identify the published articles. In regard to language, the search was limited. RESULTS: The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using FB for recruitment in healthcare research as compared to more traditional forms of recruitment remain unclear. Reporting of recruitment strategies is inconsistent, and costs are often not included. FB is being used for recruitment frequently with other methods and, although often effective, can be costly. DISCUSSION: FB is used to recruit participants for a variety of studies, with researchers using both free and paid ads to reach potential participants. Reporting of recruitment methods needs to be more rigorous, streamlined, and standardized in scientific papers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-432
Number of pages10
JournalNursing research
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Research
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Social Media
Health Services Research
Health
PubMed
Meta-Analysis
Language
Research Personnel
Databases
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Integrative Review of Recruitment of Research Participants Through Facebook. / Reagan, Louise; Nowlin, Sarah Y.; Birdsall, Stacia B.; Gabbay, Juliana; Vorderstrasse, Allison; Johnson, Constance; D'Eramo Melkus, Gail.

In: Nursing research, Vol. 68, No. 6, 01.11.2019, p. 423-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reagan, Louise ; Nowlin, Sarah Y. ; Birdsall, Stacia B. ; Gabbay, Juliana ; Vorderstrasse, Allison ; Johnson, Constance ; D'Eramo Melkus, Gail. / Integrative Review of Recruitment of Research Participants Through Facebook. In: Nursing research. 2019 ; Vol. 68, No. 6. pp. 423-432.
@article{632cf88ee72648a5acd51dbe4f41dd1b,
title = "Integrative Review of Recruitment of Research Participants Through Facebook",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Facebook (FB) has been widely used recently to recruit participants for adult health research. However, little is known about its effectiveness, cost, and the characteristics of participants recruited via FB when compared to other recruitment methods. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this integrative review was to examine the published evidence concerning the use of FB in participant recruitment for adult health research, as compared to other social media, online, and traditional recruitment methods. METHODS: In this integrative review, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were the electronic databases used to identify the published articles. In regard to language, the search was limited. RESULTS: The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using FB for recruitment in healthcare research as compared to more traditional forms of recruitment remain unclear. Reporting of recruitment strategies is inconsistent, and costs are often not included. FB is being used for recruitment frequently with other methods and, although often effective, can be costly. DISCUSSION: FB is used to recruit participants for a variety of studies, with researchers using both free and paid ads to reach potential participants. Reporting of recruitment methods needs to be more rigorous, streamlined, and standardized in scientific papers.",
author = "Louise Reagan and Nowlin, {Sarah Y.} and Birdsall, {Stacia B.} and Juliana Gabbay and Allison Vorderstrasse and Constance Johnson and {D'Eramo Melkus}, Gail",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/NNR.0000000000000385",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "423--432",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrative Review of Recruitment of Research Participants Through Facebook

AU - Reagan, Louise

AU - Nowlin, Sarah Y.

AU - Birdsall, Stacia B.

AU - Gabbay, Juliana

AU - Vorderstrasse, Allison

AU - Johnson, Constance

AU - D'Eramo Melkus, Gail

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Facebook (FB) has been widely used recently to recruit participants for adult health research. However, little is known about its effectiveness, cost, and the characteristics of participants recruited via FB when compared to other recruitment methods. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this integrative review was to examine the published evidence concerning the use of FB in participant recruitment for adult health research, as compared to other social media, online, and traditional recruitment methods. METHODS: In this integrative review, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were the electronic databases used to identify the published articles. In regard to language, the search was limited. RESULTS: The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using FB for recruitment in healthcare research as compared to more traditional forms of recruitment remain unclear. Reporting of recruitment strategies is inconsistent, and costs are often not included. FB is being used for recruitment frequently with other methods and, although often effective, can be costly. DISCUSSION: FB is used to recruit participants for a variety of studies, with researchers using both free and paid ads to reach potential participants. Reporting of recruitment methods needs to be more rigorous, streamlined, and standardized in scientific papers.

AB - BACKGROUND: Facebook (FB) has been widely used recently to recruit participants for adult health research. However, little is known about its effectiveness, cost, and the characteristics of participants recruited via FB when compared to other recruitment methods. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this integrative review was to examine the published evidence concerning the use of FB in participant recruitment for adult health research, as compared to other social media, online, and traditional recruitment methods. METHODS: In this integrative review, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were the electronic databases used to identify the published articles. In regard to language, the search was limited. RESULTS: The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using FB for recruitment in healthcare research as compared to more traditional forms of recruitment remain unclear. Reporting of recruitment strategies is inconsistent, and costs are often not included. FB is being used for recruitment frequently with other methods and, although often effective, can be costly. DISCUSSION: FB is used to recruit participants for a variety of studies, with researchers using both free and paid ads to reach potential participants. Reporting of recruitment methods needs to be more rigorous, streamlined, and standardized in scientific papers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074625572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074625572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000385

DO - 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000385

M3 - Article

C2 - 31693547

AN - SCOPUS:85074625572

VL - 68

SP - 423

EP - 432

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 6

ER -