Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them

Roozbeh Kiani, Anne K. Churchland, Michael N. Shadlen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many decisions involve integration of evidence conferred by discrete cues over time. However, the neural mechanism of this integration is poorly understood. Several decision-making models suggest that integration of evidence is implemented by a dynamic system whose state evolves toward a stable point representing the decision outcome. The internal dynamics of such point attractor models render them sensitive to the temporal gaps between cues because their internal forces push the state forward once it is dislodged from the initial stable point. We asked whether human subjects are as sensitive to such temporal gaps. Subjects reported the net direction of stochastic random dot motion, which was presented in one or two brief observation windows (pulses). Pulse strength and interpulse interval varied randomly from trial to trial. We found that subjects' performance was largely invariant to the interpulse intervals up to at least 1 s. The findings question the implementation of the integration process via mechanisms that rely on autonomous changes of network state. The mechanism should be capable of freezing the state of the network at a variety of firing rate levels during temporal gaps between the cues, compatible with a line of stable attractor states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16483-16489
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume33
Issue number42
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Cues
Freezing
Decision Making
Observation
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them. / Kiani, Roozbeh; Churchland, Anne K.; Shadlen, Michael N.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 33, No. 42, 2013, p. 16483-16489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kiani, Roozbeh ; Churchland, Anne K. ; Shadlen, Michael N. / Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 42. pp. 16483-16489.
@article{cc3d2c762f744578af2e950a554658fd,
title = "Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them",
abstract = "Many decisions involve integration of evidence conferred by discrete cues over time. However, the neural mechanism of this integration is poorly understood. Several decision-making models suggest that integration of evidence is implemented by a dynamic system whose state evolves toward a stable point representing the decision outcome. The internal dynamics of such point attractor models render them sensitive to the temporal gaps between cues because their internal forces push the state forward once it is dislodged from the initial stable point. We asked whether human subjects are as sensitive to such temporal gaps. Subjects reported the net direction of stochastic random dot motion, which was presented in one or two brief observation windows (pulses). Pulse strength and interpulse interval varied randomly from trial to trial. We found that subjects' performance was largely invariant to the interpulse intervals up to at least 1 s. The findings question the implementation of the integration process via mechanisms that rely on autonomous changes of network state. The mechanism should be capable of freezing the state of the network at a variety of firing rate levels during temporal gaps between the cues, compatible with a line of stable attractor states.",
author = "Roozbeh Kiani and Churchland, {Anne K.} and Shadlen, {Michael N.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2094-13.2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "16483--16489",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "42",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them

AU - Kiani, Roozbeh

AU - Churchland, Anne K.

AU - Shadlen, Michael N.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Many decisions involve integration of evidence conferred by discrete cues over time. However, the neural mechanism of this integration is poorly understood. Several decision-making models suggest that integration of evidence is implemented by a dynamic system whose state evolves toward a stable point representing the decision outcome. The internal dynamics of such point attractor models render them sensitive to the temporal gaps between cues because their internal forces push the state forward once it is dislodged from the initial stable point. We asked whether human subjects are as sensitive to such temporal gaps. Subjects reported the net direction of stochastic random dot motion, which was presented in one or two brief observation windows (pulses). Pulse strength and interpulse interval varied randomly from trial to trial. We found that subjects' performance was largely invariant to the interpulse intervals up to at least 1 s. The findings question the implementation of the integration process via mechanisms that rely on autonomous changes of network state. The mechanism should be capable of freezing the state of the network at a variety of firing rate levels during temporal gaps between the cues, compatible with a line of stable attractor states.

AB - Many decisions involve integration of evidence conferred by discrete cues over time. However, the neural mechanism of this integration is poorly understood. Several decision-making models suggest that integration of evidence is implemented by a dynamic system whose state evolves toward a stable point representing the decision outcome. The internal dynamics of such point attractor models render them sensitive to the temporal gaps between cues because their internal forces push the state forward once it is dislodged from the initial stable point. We asked whether human subjects are as sensitive to such temporal gaps. Subjects reported the net direction of stochastic random dot motion, which was presented in one or two brief observation windows (pulses). Pulse strength and interpulse interval varied randomly from trial to trial. We found that subjects' performance was largely invariant to the interpulse intervals up to at least 1 s. The findings question the implementation of the integration process via mechanisms that rely on autonomous changes of network state. The mechanism should be capable of freezing the state of the network at a variety of firing rate levels during temporal gaps between the cues, compatible with a line of stable attractor states.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885458249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885458249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2094-13.2013

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2094-13.2013

M3 - Article

C2 - 24133253

AN - SCOPUS:84885458249

VL - 33

SP - 16483

EP - 16489

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 42

ER -