Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship

The contribution of narrative inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be done. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-300
Number of pages15
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

public administration
narrative
inclusion
leadership
demand
community
Public Administration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship : The contribution of narrative inquiry. / Dodge, Jennifer; Ospina, Sonia M.; Foldy, Erica Gabrielle.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 65, No. 3, 05.2005, p. 286-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{bc62c5e356c74a408274cec0888de3cc,
title = "Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship: The contribution of narrative inquiry",
abstract = "A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be done. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.",
author = "Jennifer Dodge and Ospina, {Sonia M.} and Foldy, {Erica Gabrielle}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00454.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "286--300",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship

T2 - The contribution of narrative inquiry

AU - Dodge, Jennifer

AU - Ospina, Sonia M.

AU - Foldy, Erica Gabrielle

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be done. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.

AB - A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be done. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19944406453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19944406453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00454.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00454.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 65

SP - 286

EP - 300

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 3

ER -