Institutionalising decentralised project planning under Kenya's programme for rural trade and production centres

Paul Smoke, H. E. Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 1986, the government of Kenya launched a new regional development strategy intended to complement its ongoing attempts to decentralise project planning and implementation. A key component of this strategy is the rural trade and production centre programme, which is designed to strengthen small town-rural linkages in support of agriculture and non-farm production. This paper examines some successful aspects of this programme, as well as how political, bureacratic and capacity constraints forced major modifications in the programme's planned implementation process and presented local agencies from assuming as much responsibility as planned. A number of lessons are drawn from this experience to guide similar efforts in other countries. -Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-247
Number of pages27
JournalThird World Planning Review
Volume15
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

project planning
Kenya
implementation process
small town
development strategy
regional development
agriculture
responsibility
planning
programme
project
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development

Cite this

Institutionalising decentralised project planning under Kenya's programme for rural trade and production centres. / Smoke, Paul; Evans, H. E.

In: Third World Planning Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1993, p. 221-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9482edade21742c19bae35f0f8da6c8d,
title = "Institutionalising decentralised project planning under Kenya's programme for rural trade and production centres",
abstract = "In 1986, the government of Kenya launched a new regional development strategy intended to complement its ongoing attempts to decentralise project planning and implementation. A key component of this strategy is the rural trade and production centre programme, which is designed to strengthen small town-rural linkages in support of agriculture and non-farm production. This paper examines some successful aspects of this programme, as well as how political, bureacratic and capacity constraints forced major modifications in the programme's planned implementation process and presented local agencies from assuming as much responsibility as planned. A number of lessons are drawn from this experience to guide similar efforts in other countries. -Authors",
author = "Paul Smoke and Evans, {H. E.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "221--247",
journal = "International Development Planning Review",
issn = "1474-6743",
publisher = "Liverpool University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutionalising decentralised project planning under Kenya's programme for rural trade and production centres

AU - Smoke, Paul

AU - Evans, H. E.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - In 1986, the government of Kenya launched a new regional development strategy intended to complement its ongoing attempts to decentralise project planning and implementation. A key component of this strategy is the rural trade and production centre programme, which is designed to strengthen small town-rural linkages in support of agriculture and non-farm production. This paper examines some successful aspects of this programme, as well as how political, bureacratic and capacity constraints forced major modifications in the programme's planned implementation process and presented local agencies from assuming as much responsibility as planned. A number of lessons are drawn from this experience to guide similar efforts in other countries. -Authors

AB - In 1986, the government of Kenya launched a new regional development strategy intended to complement its ongoing attempts to decentralise project planning and implementation. A key component of this strategy is the rural trade and production centre programme, which is designed to strengthen small town-rural linkages in support of agriculture and non-farm production. This paper examines some successful aspects of this programme, as well as how political, bureacratic and capacity constraints forced major modifications in the programme's planned implementation process and presented local agencies from assuming as much responsibility as planned. A number of lessons are drawn from this experience to guide similar efforts in other countries. -Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027743218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027743218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027743218

VL - 15

SP - 221

EP - 247

JO - International Development Planning Review

JF - International Development Planning Review

SN - 1474-6743

IS - 3

ER -