Inside the Sausage Factory

Improving Estimates of the Effects of Health Insurance Expansion Proposals

Sharon Glied, Dahlia K. Remler, Joshua Graff Zivin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The fate of a proposal to expand health insurance is influenced by predictions of the proposal's effects on the number of newly insured and the cost of new coverage. Estimates vary widely, for reasons that are often hard to discern and evaluate. This article describes and compares the frameworks and parameters used for insurance modeling. It examines conventions and controversies surrounding a series of modeling parameters: how individuals respond to a change in the price of coverage, the extent of participation in a new plan by those already privately insured, firms' behavior, and the value of public versus private coverage. The article also suggests ways of making models more transparent and proposes "reference case" guidelines for modelers so that consumers can compare modeling results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)603-628
Number of pages26
JournalMilbank Quarterly
Volume80
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Health Insurance
Insurance
factory
health insurance
coverage
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
insurance
firm
participation
costs
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Inside the Sausage Factory : Improving Estimates of the Effects of Health Insurance Expansion Proposals. / Glied, Sharon; Remler, Dahlia K.; Graff Zivin, Joshua.

In: Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 80, No. 4, 2002, p. 603-628.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glied, Sharon ; Remler, Dahlia K. ; Graff Zivin, Joshua. / Inside the Sausage Factory : Improving Estimates of the Effects of Health Insurance Expansion Proposals. In: Milbank Quarterly. 2002 ; Vol. 80, No. 4. pp. 603-628.
@article{5a02fed397a948a59e708466f4b9434c,
title = "Inside the Sausage Factory: Improving Estimates of the Effects of Health Insurance Expansion Proposals",
abstract = "The fate of a proposal to expand health insurance is influenced by predictions of the proposal's effects on the number of newly insured and the cost of new coverage. Estimates vary widely, for reasons that are often hard to discern and evaluate. This article describes and compares the frameworks and parameters used for insurance modeling. It examines conventions and controversies surrounding a series of modeling parameters: how individuals respond to a change in the price of coverage, the extent of participation in a new plan by those already privately insured, firms' behavior, and the value of public versus private coverage. The article also suggests ways of making models more transparent and proposes {"}reference case{"} guidelines for modelers so that consumers can compare modeling results.",
author = "Sharon Glied and Remler, {Dahlia K.} and {Graff Zivin}, Joshua",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1111/1468-0009.00026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "603--628",
journal = "Milbank Quarterly",
issn = "0887-378X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inside the Sausage Factory

T2 - Improving Estimates of the Effects of Health Insurance Expansion Proposals

AU - Glied, Sharon

AU - Remler, Dahlia K.

AU - Graff Zivin, Joshua

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The fate of a proposal to expand health insurance is influenced by predictions of the proposal's effects on the number of newly insured and the cost of new coverage. Estimates vary widely, for reasons that are often hard to discern and evaluate. This article describes and compares the frameworks and parameters used for insurance modeling. It examines conventions and controversies surrounding a series of modeling parameters: how individuals respond to a change in the price of coverage, the extent of participation in a new plan by those already privately insured, firms' behavior, and the value of public versus private coverage. The article also suggests ways of making models more transparent and proposes "reference case" guidelines for modelers so that consumers can compare modeling results.

AB - The fate of a proposal to expand health insurance is influenced by predictions of the proposal's effects on the number of newly insured and the cost of new coverage. Estimates vary widely, for reasons that are often hard to discern and evaluate. This article describes and compares the frameworks and parameters used for insurance modeling. It examines conventions and controversies surrounding a series of modeling parameters: how individuals respond to a change in the price of coverage, the extent of participation in a new plan by those already privately insured, firms' behavior, and the value of public versus private coverage. The article also suggests ways of making models more transparent and proposes "reference case" guidelines for modelers so that consumers can compare modeling results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041914425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041914425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1468-0009.00026

DO - 10.1111/1468-0009.00026

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 603

EP - 628

JO - Milbank Quarterly

JF - Milbank Quarterly

SN - 0887-378X

IS - 4

ER -