Inhibiting factors in generating examples by mathematics teachers and student teachers: The case of binary operation

Orit Zaslavsky, Irit Peled

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The main objectives of this study were to identify difficulties encountered by mathematics teachers and student teachers associated with the concept of binary operation regarding the associative and commutative properties and to reveal possible sources for them. Thirty-six in-service mathematics teachers and 67 preservice mathematics teachers participated in the study. All participants were presented with a task calling for the generation of a counterexample, namely, a binary operation that is commutative but not associative. Responses to the task were analyzed according to four categories: correctness, productiveness, mathematical content, and underlying difficulties. The findings point to similarities and differences between the two groups. Both groups exhibited a weak concept by failing to produce a correct example and by using a limited content search-space. These findings suggest two main inhibiting factors: one related to the overgeneralization of the properties of basic binary operations and the other related to pseudo-similarities attributed to these properties, which seem to be created by the recurring theme of order. Teachers were superior to student teachers on the categories of correctness and productiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-78
Number of pages12
JournalJournal for Research in Mathematics Education
Volume27
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Binary operation
student teacher
mathematics
Correctness
teacher
Search Space
Counterexample
Group
Concepts
Similarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{0ae052c6813c4132b53d95a298cba54b,
title = "Inhibiting factors in generating examples by mathematics teachers and student teachers: The case of binary operation",
abstract = "The main objectives of this study were to identify difficulties encountered by mathematics teachers and student teachers associated with the concept of binary operation regarding the associative and commutative properties and to reveal possible sources for them. Thirty-six in-service mathematics teachers and 67 preservice mathematics teachers participated in the study. All participants were presented with a task calling for the generation of a counterexample, namely, a binary operation that is commutative but not associative. Responses to the task were analyzed according to four categories: correctness, productiveness, mathematical content, and underlying difficulties. The findings point to similarities and differences between the two groups. Both groups exhibited a weak concept by failing to produce a correct example and by using a limited content search-space. These findings suggest two main inhibiting factors: one related to the overgeneralization of the properties of basic binary operations and the other related to pseudo-similarities attributed to these properties, which seem to be created by the recurring theme of order. Teachers were superior to student teachers on the categories of correctness and productiveness.",
author = "Orit Zaslavsky and Irit Peled",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "67--78",
journal = "Journal for Research in Mathematics Education",
issn = "0021-8251",
publisher = "National Council of Teachers of Mathematics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibiting factors in generating examples by mathematics teachers and student teachers

T2 - The case of binary operation

AU - Zaslavsky, Orit

AU - Peled, Irit

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The main objectives of this study were to identify difficulties encountered by mathematics teachers and student teachers associated with the concept of binary operation regarding the associative and commutative properties and to reveal possible sources for them. Thirty-six in-service mathematics teachers and 67 preservice mathematics teachers participated in the study. All participants were presented with a task calling for the generation of a counterexample, namely, a binary operation that is commutative but not associative. Responses to the task were analyzed according to four categories: correctness, productiveness, mathematical content, and underlying difficulties. The findings point to similarities and differences between the two groups. Both groups exhibited a weak concept by failing to produce a correct example and by using a limited content search-space. These findings suggest two main inhibiting factors: one related to the overgeneralization of the properties of basic binary operations and the other related to pseudo-similarities attributed to these properties, which seem to be created by the recurring theme of order. Teachers were superior to student teachers on the categories of correctness and productiveness.

AB - The main objectives of this study were to identify difficulties encountered by mathematics teachers and student teachers associated with the concept of binary operation regarding the associative and commutative properties and to reveal possible sources for them. Thirty-six in-service mathematics teachers and 67 preservice mathematics teachers participated in the study. All participants were presented with a task calling for the generation of a counterexample, namely, a binary operation that is commutative but not associative. Responses to the task were analyzed according to four categories: correctness, productiveness, mathematical content, and underlying difficulties. The findings point to similarities and differences between the two groups. Both groups exhibited a weak concept by failing to produce a correct example and by using a limited content search-space. These findings suggest two main inhibiting factors: one related to the overgeneralization of the properties of basic binary operations and the other related to pseudo-similarities attributed to these properties, which seem to be created by the recurring theme of order. Teachers were superior to student teachers on the categories of correctness and productiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21844507280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21844507280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21844507280

VL - 27

SP - 67

EP - 78

JO - Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

JF - Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

SN - 0021-8251

IS - 1

ER -