Information content versus relational knowledge: Semantic deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Justin M. Aronoff, Laura M. Gonnerman, Amit Almor, Sudha Arunachalam, Daniel Kempler, Elaine S. Andersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Studies of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yielded conflicting results, some finding evidence of considerable deficits, others finding that semantic knowledge is relatively intact. How do we reconcile findings from picture naming tasks that seem to indicate semantic impairment in AD with results from certain sorting tasks that suggest intact semantics? To investigate the basis of the contradictory results described above, we conducted a study using two types of tasks: (1) picture naming; and (2) board sorting. The board sorting task we used is a simultaneous similarity judgment task, in which participants are asked to place more similar concepts closer together and less similar ones farther apart. We compared the performance of AD patients on these two tasks, using a number of different analyses that yield very different patterns of results. Our results indicate that whether patients show impairment or not depends on both the nature of the task and the subsequent analysis chosen. Specifically, tasks and analyses that focus on relational knowledge (e.g., dog is more related to cat than to camel) lead to different conclusions than those based on specific information about individual items. These findings suggest that the board sorting method, when coupled with multiple analyses, provides a more complete picture of the underlying semantic deficit in AD than previous studies have shown.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-35
Number of pages15
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Semantics
Alzheimer Disease
Camelus
Cats
Dogs

Keywords

  • Board sorting
  • Language impairment
  • Semantic deficits
  • Similarity judgments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Information content versus relational knowledge : Semantic deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease. / Aronoff, Justin M.; Gonnerman, Laura M.; Almor, Amit; Arunachalam, Sudha; Kempler, Daniel; Andersen, Elaine S.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 21-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aronoff, Justin M. ; Gonnerman, Laura M. ; Almor, Amit ; Arunachalam, Sudha ; Kempler, Daniel ; Andersen, Elaine S. / Information content versus relational knowledge : Semantic deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease. In: Neuropsychologia. 2006 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 21-35.
@article{76182d3f2f3744e08923722bce3ffac9,
title = "Information content versus relational knowledge: Semantic deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "Studies of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yielded conflicting results, some finding evidence of considerable deficits, others finding that semantic knowledge is relatively intact. How do we reconcile findings from picture naming tasks that seem to indicate semantic impairment in AD with results from certain sorting tasks that suggest intact semantics? To investigate the basis of the contradictory results described above, we conducted a study using two types of tasks: (1) picture naming; and (2) board sorting. The board sorting task we used is a simultaneous similarity judgment task, in which participants are asked to place more similar concepts closer together and less similar ones farther apart. We compared the performance of AD patients on these two tasks, using a number of different analyses that yield very different patterns of results. Our results indicate that whether patients show impairment or not depends on both the nature of the task and the subsequent analysis chosen. Specifically, tasks and analyses that focus on relational knowledge (e.g., dog is more related to cat than to camel) lead to different conclusions than those based on specific information about individual items. These findings suggest that the board sorting method, when coupled with multiple analyses, provides a more complete picture of the underlying semantic deficit in AD than previous studies have shown.",
keywords = "Board sorting, Language impairment, Semantic deficits, Similarity judgments",
author = "Aronoff, {Justin M.} and Gonnerman, {Laura M.} and Amit Almor and Sudha Arunachalam and Daniel Kempler and Andersen, {Elaine S.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "21--35",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Information content versus relational knowledge

T2 - Semantic deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease

AU - Aronoff, Justin M.

AU - Gonnerman, Laura M.

AU - Almor, Amit

AU - Arunachalam, Sudha

AU - Kempler, Daniel

AU - Andersen, Elaine S.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Studies of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yielded conflicting results, some finding evidence of considerable deficits, others finding that semantic knowledge is relatively intact. How do we reconcile findings from picture naming tasks that seem to indicate semantic impairment in AD with results from certain sorting tasks that suggest intact semantics? To investigate the basis of the contradictory results described above, we conducted a study using two types of tasks: (1) picture naming; and (2) board sorting. The board sorting task we used is a simultaneous similarity judgment task, in which participants are asked to place more similar concepts closer together and less similar ones farther apart. We compared the performance of AD patients on these two tasks, using a number of different analyses that yield very different patterns of results. Our results indicate that whether patients show impairment or not depends on both the nature of the task and the subsequent analysis chosen. Specifically, tasks and analyses that focus on relational knowledge (e.g., dog is more related to cat than to camel) lead to different conclusions than those based on specific information about individual items. These findings suggest that the board sorting method, when coupled with multiple analyses, provides a more complete picture of the underlying semantic deficit in AD than previous studies have shown.

AB - Studies of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yielded conflicting results, some finding evidence of considerable deficits, others finding that semantic knowledge is relatively intact. How do we reconcile findings from picture naming tasks that seem to indicate semantic impairment in AD with results from certain sorting tasks that suggest intact semantics? To investigate the basis of the contradictory results described above, we conducted a study using two types of tasks: (1) picture naming; and (2) board sorting. The board sorting task we used is a simultaneous similarity judgment task, in which participants are asked to place more similar concepts closer together and less similar ones farther apart. We compared the performance of AD patients on these two tasks, using a number of different analyses that yield very different patterns of results. Our results indicate that whether patients show impairment or not depends on both the nature of the task and the subsequent analysis chosen. Specifically, tasks and analyses that focus on relational knowledge (e.g., dog is more related to cat than to camel) lead to different conclusions than those based on specific information about individual items. These findings suggest that the board sorting method, when coupled with multiple analyses, provides a more complete picture of the underlying semantic deficit in AD than previous studies have shown.

KW - Board sorting

KW - Language impairment

KW - Semantic deficits

KW - Similarity judgments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28044438953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28044438953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 15925392

AN - SCOPUS:28044438953

VL - 44

SP - 21

EP - 35

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 1

ER -