Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering

Christine Harrington

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    There are three distinctive approaches to informalism in the field of law and politics: judicial hierarchy approach, ongoing relationship approach, and legal pluralist approach. In general, all three approaches have similar descriptions of informal forms of orderings, be they institutions, such as small claims courts, or procedures, such as mediation. The approaches differ in terms of how each treats the relationship between informal and other forms of ordering. This article analyzes informalism as a form of legal ordering embedded in judicial and administrative institutions. It begins by discussing judicial hierarchy, the nature of the relationship between the parties as a principle determinant of whether informal or formal forms of ordering apply, and legal pluralism. The article then considers the central "technologies" of informalism within judicial and administrative settings, such as mediation and negotiated rulemaking. It also reviews research on informal law in the law and politics field and what these studies of informalism imply about the politics of law and legal institutions more generally.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics
    PublisherOxford University Press
    ISBN (Electronic)9780191576980
    ISBN (Print)9780199208425
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 14 2008

    Fingerprint

    Law
    mediation
    politics
    pluralism
    determinants

    Keywords

    • Informal law
    • Informalism
    • Judicial hierarchy
    • Law
    • Legal institutions
    • Legal ordering
    • Legal pluralism
    • Mediation
    • Negotiated rulemaking
    • Politics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Harrington, C. (2008). Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0021

    Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering. / Harrington, Christine.

    The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Harrington, C 2008, Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering. in The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0021
    Harrington C. Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press. 2008 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0021
    Harrington, Christine. / Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2008.
    @inbook{d70b3a1107764805acdb2c0d93e06802,
    title = "Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering",
    abstract = "There are three distinctive approaches to informalism in the field of law and politics: judicial hierarchy approach, ongoing relationship approach, and legal pluralist approach. In general, all three approaches have similar descriptions of informal forms of orderings, be they institutions, such as small claims courts, or procedures, such as mediation. The approaches differ in terms of how each treats the relationship between informal and other forms of ordering. This article analyzes informalism as a form of legal ordering embedded in judicial and administrative institutions. It begins by discussing judicial hierarchy, the nature of the relationship between the parties as a principle determinant of whether informal or formal forms of ordering apply, and legal pluralism. The article then considers the central {"}technologies{"} of informalism within judicial and administrative settings, such as mediation and negotiated rulemaking. It also reviews research on informal law in the law and politics field and what these studies of informalism imply about the politics of law and legal institutions more generally.",
    keywords = "Informal law, Informalism, Judicial hierarchy, Law, Legal institutions, Legal ordering, Legal pluralism, Mediation, Negotiated rulemaking, Politics",
    author = "Christine Harrington",
    year = "2008",
    month = "8",
    day = "14",
    doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0021",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780199208425",
    booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Informalism as a Form of Legal Ordering

    AU - Harrington, Christine

    PY - 2008/8/14

    Y1 - 2008/8/14

    N2 - There are three distinctive approaches to informalism in the field of law and politics: judicial hierarchy approach, ongoing relationship approach, and legal pluralist approach. In general, all three approaches have similar descriptions of informal forms of orderings, be they institutions, such as small claims courts, or procedures, such as mediation. The approaches differ in terms of how each treats the relationship between informal and other forms of ordering. This article analyzes informalism as a form of legal ordering embedded in judicial and administrative institutions. It begins by discussing judicial hierarchy, the nature of the relationship between the parties as a principle determinant of whether informal or formal forms of ordering apply, and legal pluralism. The article then considers the central "technologies" of informalism within judicial and administrative settings, such as mediation and negotiated rulemaking. It also reviews research on informal law in the law and politics field and what these studies of informalism imply about the politics of law and legal institutions more generally.

    AB - There are three distinctive approaches to informalism in the field of law and politics: judicial hierarchy approach, ongoing relationship approach, and legal pluralist approach. In general, all three approaches have similar descriptions of informal forms of orderings, be they institutions, such as small claims courts, or procedures, such as mediation. The approaches differ in terms of how each treats the relationship between informal and other forms of ordering. This article analyzes informalism as a form of legal ordering embedded in judicial and administrative institutions. It begins by discussing judicial hierarchy, the nature of the relationship between the parties as a principle determinant of whether informal or formal forms of ordering apply, and legal pluralism. The article then considers the central "technologies" of informalism within judicial and administrative settings, such as mediation and negotiated rulemaking. It also reviews research on informal law in the law and politics field and what these studies of informalism imply about the politics of law and legal institutions more generally.

    KW - Informal law

    KW - Informalism

    KW - Judicial hierarchy

    KW - Law

    KW - Legal institutions

    KW - Legal ordering

    KW - Legal pluralism

    KW - Mediation

    KW - Negotiated rulemaking

    KW - Politics

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898613149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898613149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0021

    DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0021

    M3 - Chapter

    AN - SCOPUS:84898613149

    SN - 9780199208425

    BT - The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics

    PB - Oxford University Press

    ER -