Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques

Junius Gunaratne, Oded Nov

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    Numerous online communities and e-commerce sites provide users with crowd-based recommendations to influence decision making about products. Similarly, automated recommender systems often use social advice or curated knowledge provided by experts to give customers personalized product recommendations. Little, however, is known about the relative strengths of these approaches in repeated-decision scenarios. We used social comparison and an expert recommendation to examine the relative effectiveness of these methods of persuasion for users making repeated retirement saving decisions. We exposed 314 performance-incentivized experiment participants to a retirement saving simulator where they made 34 yearly asset allocation decisions in one of three user interface conditions. The gap between participants’ retirement goal and actual savings was smallest in the expert advice condition and significantly better than the social comparison condition. Both conditions were significantly better than the control condition. In non-control conditions, users adjusted their behavior and achieved their saving goal more effectively.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationPersuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings
    PublisherSpringer Verlag
    Pages205-216
    Number of pages12
    Volume9072
    ISBN (Print)9783319203058
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2015
    Event10th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, PERSUASIVE 2015 - Chicago, United States
    Duration: Jun 3 2015Jun 5 2015

    Publication series

    NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
    Volume9072
    ISSN (Print)03029743
    ISSN (Electronic)16113349

    Other

    Other10th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, PERSUASIVE 2015
    CountryUnited States
    CityChicago
    Period6/3/156/5/15

    Fingerprint

    Recommender systems
    User interfaces
    Simulators
    Decision making
    Recommendations
    Experiments
    Persuasion
    Asset Allocation
    Online Communities
    Interface Conditions
    Recommender Systems
    Electronic Commerce
    User Interface
    Simulator
    Customers
    Decision Making
    Scenarios
    Experiment

    Keywords

    • Behavior change
    • Financial literacy
    • Persuasive technology
    • Retirement saving
    • Social comparison

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Computer Science(all)
    • Theoretical Computer Science

    Cite this

    Gunaratne, J., & Nov, O. (2015). Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques. In Persuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings (Vol. 9072, pp. 205-216). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9072). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_19

    Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques. / Gunaratne, Junius; Nov, Oded.

    Persuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings. Vol. 9072 Springer Verlag, 2015. p. 205-216 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9072).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Gunaratne, J & Nov, O 2015, Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques. in Persuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings. vol. 9072, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9072, Springer Verlag, pp. 205-216, 10th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, United States, 6/3/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_19
    Gunaratne J, Nov O. Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques. In Persuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings. Vol. 9072. Springer Verlag. 2015. p. 205-216. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_19
    Gunaratne, Junius ; Nov, Oded. / Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques. Persuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings. Vol. 9072 Springer Verlag, 2015. pp. 205-216 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
    @inproceedings{ecee65b8b54743ce936ead9dfed3a478,
    title = "Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques",
    abstract = "Numerous online communities and e-commerce sites provide users with crowd-based recommendations to influence decision making about products. Similarly, automated recommender systems often use social advice or curated knowledge provided by experts to give customers personalized product recommendations. Little, however, is known about the relative strengths of these approaches in repeated-decision scenarios. We used social comparison and an expert recommendation to examine the relative effectiveness of these methods of persuasion for users making repeated retirement saving decisions. We exposed 314 performance-incentivized experiment participants to a retirement saving simulator where they made 34 yearly asset allocation decisions in one of three user interface conditions. The gap between participants’ retirement goal and actual savings was smallest in the expert advice condition and significantly better than the social comparison condition. Both conditions were significantly better than the control condition. In non-control conditions, users adjusted their behavior and achieved their saving goal more effectively.",
    keywords = "Behavior change, Financial literacy, Persuasive technology, Retirement saving, Social comparison",
    author = "Junius Gunaratne and Oded Nov",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_19",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9783319203058",
    volume = "9072",
    series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    pages = "205--216",
    booktitle = "Persuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Influencing retirement saving behavior with expert advice and social comparison as persuasive techniques

    AU - Gunaratne, Junius

    AU - Nov, Oded

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Numerous online communities and e-commerce sites provide users with crowd-based recommendations to influence decision making about products. Similarly, automated recommender systems often use social advice or curated knowledge provided by experts to give customers personalized product recommendations. Little, however, is known about the relative strengths of these approaches in repeated-decision scenarios. We used social comparison and an expert recommendation to examine the relative effectiveness of these methods of persuasion for users making repeated retirement saving decisions. We exposed 314 performance-incentivized experiment participants to a retirement saving simulator where they made 34 yearly asset allocation decisions in one of three user interface conditions. The gap between participants’ retirement goal and actual savings was smallest in the expert advice condition and significantly better than the social comparison condition. Both conditions were significantly better than the control condition. In non-control conditions, users adjusted their behavior and achieved their saving goal more effectively.

    AB - Numerous online communities and e-commerce sites provide users with crowd-based recommendations to influence decision making about products. Similarly, automated recommender systems often use social advice or curated knowledge provided by experts to give customers personalized product recommendations. Little, however, is known about the relative strengths of these approaches in repeated-decision scenarios. We used social comparison and an expert recommendation to examine the relative effectiveness of these methods of persuasion for users making repeated retirement saving decisions. We exposed 314 performance-incentivized experiment participants to a retirement saving simulator where they made 34 yearly asset allocation decisions in one of three user interface conditions. The gap between participants’ retirement goal and actual savings was smallest in the expert advice condition and significantly better than the social comparison condition. Both conditions were significantly better than the control condition. In non-control conditions, users adjusted their behavior and achieved their saving goal more effectively.

    KW - Behavior change

    KW - Financial literacy

    KW - Persuasive technology

    KW - Retirement saving

    KW - Social comparison

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937459622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937459622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_19

    DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_19

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 9783319203058

    VL - 9072

    T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

    SP - 205

    EP - 216

    BT - Persuasive Technology - 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Proceedings

    PB - Springer Verlag

    ER -