Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects

Kentaro Fujita, Tal Eyal, Shelly Chaiken, Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is argued that the temporal distance of attitude objects systematically changes how the object is mentally represented, and thus influences the strength of particular persuasive appeals. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that people preferentially attend to arguments that highlight primary, abstract (high-level) vs. incidental, concrete (low-level) features when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near. Results suggested that when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near, arguments emphasizing primary vs. secondary features (Study 1), desirability vs. feasibility features (Study 2), and general classes vs. specific cases are more persuasive (Study 3). The relation of construal theory to dual process theories of persuasion and persuasion phenomena, such as personal relevance effects and functional matching effects, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)562-572
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Persuasive Communication
persuasion
Feasibility Studies
appeal
experiment

Keywords

  • Attitude change
  • Construal level theory
  • Mental construal
  • Persuasion
  • Temporal distance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. / Fujita, Kentaro; Eyal, Tal; Chaiken, Shelly; Trope, Yaacov; Liberman, Nira.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 562-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fujita, Kentaro ; Eyal, Tal ; Chaiken, Shelly ; Trope, Yaacov ; Liberman, Nira. / Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 562-572.
@article{be3f818f459c44f495ed6afe58a16fc3,
title = "Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects",
abstract = "It is argued that the temporal distance of attitude objects systematically changes how the object is mentally represented, and thus influences the strength of particular persuasive appeals. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that people preferentially attend to arguments that highlight primary, abstract (high-level) vs. incidental, concrete (low-level) features when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near. Results suggested that when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near, arguments emphasizing primary vs. secondary features (Study 1), desirability vs. feasibility features (Study 2), and general classes vs. specific cases are more persuasive (Study 3). The relation of construal theory to dual process theories of persuasion and persuasion phenomena, such as personal relevance effects and functional matching effects, are discussed.",
keywords = "Attitude change, Construal level theory, Mental construal, Persuasion, Temporal distance",
author = "Kentaro Fujita and Tal Eyal and Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov Trope and Nira Liberman",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "562--572",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects

AU - Fujita, Kentaro

AU - Eyal, Tal

AU - Chaiken, Shelly

AU - Trope, Yaacov

AU - Liberman, Nira

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - It is argued that the temporal distance of attitude objects systematically changes how the object is mentally represented, and thus influences the strength of particular persuasive appeals. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that people preferentially attend to arguments that highlight primary, abstract (high-level) vs. incidental, concrete (low-level) features when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near. Results suggested that when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near, arguments emphasizing primary vs. secondary features (Study 1), desirability vs. feasibility features (Study 2), and general classes vs. specific cases are more persuasive (Study 3). The relation of construal theory to dual process theories of persuasion and persuasion phenomena, such as personal relevance effects and functional matching effects, are discussed.

AB - It is argued that the temporal distance of attitude objects systematically changes how the object is mentally represented, and thus influences the strength of particular persuasive appeals. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that people preferentially attend to arguments that highlight primary, abstract (high-level) vs. incidental, concrete (low-level) features when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near. Results suggested that when attitude objects are temporally distant vs. near, arguments emphasizing primary vs. secondary features (Study 1), desirability vs. feasibility features (Study 2), and general classes vs. specific cases are more persuasive (Study 3). The relation of construal theory to dual process theories of persuasion and persuasion phenomena, such as personal relevance effects and functional matching effects, are discussed.

KW - Attitude change

KW - Construal level theory

KW - Mental construal

KW - Persuasion

KW - Temporal distance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41549092284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41549092284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 562

EP - 572

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 3

ER -