Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument

William Easterly

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Consistent with the provocative hypothesis of Engerman and Sokoloff [Engermann, Stanley and Kenneth Sokoloff (1997), "Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States," in Stephen Haber, ed. How Latin America Fell Behind, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press., Sokoloff, Kenneth L. and Stanley L. Engerman (2000), Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World, Journal of Economic Perspectives v14, n3, 217-32.], this paper confirms with cross-country data that agricultural endowments predict inequality and inequality predicts development. The use of agricultural endowments -specifically the abundance of land suitable for growing wheat relative to that suitable for growing sugarcane - as an instrument for inequality is this paper's approach to problems of measurement and endogeneity of inequality. The paper finds inequality also affects other development outcomes - institutions and schooling -which the literature has emphasized as mechanisms by which higher inequality lowers per capita income. It tests the inequality hypothesis for development, institutional quality and schooling against other recent hypotheses in the literature. While finding some evidence consistent with other development fundamentals, the paper finds high inequality to independently be a large and statistically significant barrier to prosperity, good quality institutions, and high schooling.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)755-776
    Number of pages22
    JournalJournal of Development Economics
    Volume84
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2007

    Fingerprint

    underdevelopment
    education
    cause
    institutional development
    economics
    wheat
    income
    Underdevelopment
    prosperity
    historian
    Latin America
    world
    economy

    Keywords

    • growth
    • inequality
    • institutions
    • schooling

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Inequality does cause underdevelopment : Insights from a new instrument. / Easterly, William.

    In: Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 84, No. 2, 11.2007, p. 755-776.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{93785bbe72284246a166a9cc453479f7,
    title = "Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument",
    abstract = "Consistent with the provocative hypothesis of Engerman and Sokoloff [Engermann, Stanley and Kenneth Sokoloff (1997), {"}Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States,{"} in Stephen Haber, ed. How Latin America Fell Behind, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press., Sokoloff, Kenneth L. and Stanley L. Engerman (2000), Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World, Journal of Economic Perspectives v14, n3, 217-32.], this paper confirms with cross-country data that agricultural endowments predict inequality and inequality predicts development. The use of agricultural endowments -specifically the abundance of land suitable for growing wheat relative to that suitable for growing sugarcane - as an instrument for inequality is this paper's approach to problems of measurement and endogeneity of inequality. The paper finds inequality also affects other development outcomes - institutions and schooling -which the literature has emphasized as mechanisms by which higher inequality lowers per capita income. It tests the inequality hypothesis for development, institutional quality and schooling against other recent hypotheses in the literature. While finding some evidence consistent with other development fundamentals, the paper finds high inequality to independently be a large and statistically significant barrier to prosperity, good quality institutions, and high schooling.",
    keywords = "growth, inequality, institutions, schooling",
    author = "William Easterly",
    year = "2007",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "84",
    pages = "755--776",
    journal = "Journal of Development of Economics",
    issn = "0304-3878",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Inequality does cause underdevelopment

    T2 - Insights from a new instrument

    AU - Easterly, William

    PY - 2007/11

    Y1 - 2007/11

    N2 - Consistent with the provocative hypothesis of Engerman and Sokoloff [Engermann, Stanley and Kenneth Sokoloff (1997), "Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States," in Stephen Haber, ed. How Latin America Fell Behind, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press., Sokoloff, Kenneth L. and Stanley L. Engerman (2000), Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World, Journal of Economic Perspectives v14, n3, 217-32.], this paper confirms with cross-country data that agricultural endowments predict inequality and inequality predicts development. The use of agricultural endowments -specifically the abundance of land suitable for growing wheat relative to that suitable for growing sugarcane - as an instrument for inequality is this paper's approach to problems of measurement and endogeneity of inequality. The paper finds inequality also affects other development outcomes - institutions and schooling -which the literature has emphasized as mechanisms by which higher inequality lowers per capita income. It tests the inequality hypothesis for development, institutional quality and schooling against other recent hypotheses in the literature. While finding some evidence consistent with other development fundamentals, the paper finds high inequality to independently be a large and statistically significant barrier to prosperity, good quality institutions, and high schooling.

    AB - Consistent with the provocative hypothesis of Engerman and Sokoloff [Engermann, Stanley and Kenneth Sokoloff (1997), "Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States," in Stephen Haber, ed. How Latin America Fell Behind, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press., Sokoloff, Kenneth L. and Stanley L. Engerman (2000), Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World, Journal of Economic Perspectives v14, n3, 217-32.], this paper confirms with cross-country data that agricultural endowments predict inequality and inequality predicts development. The use of agricultural endowments -specifically the abundance of land suitable for growing wheat relative to that suitable for growing sugarcane - as an instrument for inequality is this paper's approach to problems of measurement and endogeneity of inequality. The paper finds inequality also affects other development outcomes - institutions and schooling -which the literature has emphasized as mechanisms by which higher inequality lowers per capita income. It tests the inequality hypothesis for development, institutional quality and schooling against other recent hypotheses in the literature. While finding some evidence consistent with other development fundamentals, the paper finds high inequality to independently be a large and statistically significant barrier to prosperity, good quality institutions, and high schooling.

    KW - growth

    KW - inequality

    KW - institutions

    KW - schooling

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548072537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548072537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.002

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:34548072537

    VL - 84

    SP - 755

    EP - 776

    JO - Journal of Development of Economics

    JF - Journal of Development of Economics

    SN - 0304-3878

    IS - 2

    ER -