Induction and category coherence

Mary E. Lassaline, Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-99
Number of pages5
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1996

Fingerprint

Induction
Family Resemblance
Inductive Inference
Stimulus
Salient
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Induction and category coherence. / Lassaline, Mary E.; Murphy, Gregory.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 03.1996, p. 95-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lassaline, Mary E. ; Murphy, Gregory. / Induction and category coherence. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1996 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 95-99.
@article{1a6c4f4a44b64c16aeb4be5874c3e5ca,
title = "Induction and category coherence",
abstract = "In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.",
author = "Lassaline, {Mary E.} and Gregory Murphy",
year = "1996",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3758/BF03210747",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "95--99",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Induction and category coherence

AU - Lassaline, Mary E.

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 1996/3

Y1 - 1996/3

N2 - In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.

AB - In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002764902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002764902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03210747

DO - 10.3758/BF03210747

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 95

EP - 99

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -