Individual differences in learning predict the return of fear

Samuel J. Gershman, Catherine Hartley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using a laboratory analogue of learned fear (Pavlovian fear conditioning), we show that there is substantial heterogeneity across individuals in spontaneous recovery of fear following extinction training. We propose that this heterogeneity might stem from qualitative individual differences in the nature of extinction learning. Whereas some individuals tend to form a new memory during extinction, leaving their fear memory intact, others update the original threat association with new safety information, effectively unlearning the fear memory. We formalize this account in a computational model of fear learning and show that individuals who, according to the model, are more likely to form new extinction memories tend to show greater spontaneous recovery compared to individuals who appear to only update a single memory. This qualitative variation in fear and extinction learning may have important implications for understanding vulnerability and resilience to fear-related psychiatric disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-250
Number of pages8
JournalLearning and Behavior
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 28 2015

Fingerprint

Individuality
Fear
Learning
Psychiatry
Psychological Extinction
Safety

Keywords

  • Extinction
  • Fear conditioning
  • Memory
  • Reinforcement learning
  • Spontaneous recovery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Individual differences in learning predict the return of fear. / Gershman, Samuel J.; Hartley, Catherine.

In: Learning and Behavior, Vol. 43, No. 3, 28.09.2015, p. 243-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c85d131af67247e8b572d02c0b697341,
title = "Individual differences in learning predict the return of fear",
abstract = "Using a laboratory analogue of learned fear (Pavlovian fear conditioning), we show that there is substantial heterogeneity across individuals in spontaneous recovery of fear following extinction training. We propose that this heterogeneity might stem from qualitative individual differences in the nature of extinction learning. Whereas some individuals tend to form a new memory during extinction, leaving their fear memory intact, others update the original threat association with new safety information, effectively unlearning the fear memory. We formalize this account in a computational model of fear learning and show that individuals who, according to the model, are more likely to form new extinction memories tend to show greater spontaneous recovery compared to individuals who appear to only update a single memory. This qualitative variation in fear and extinction learning may have important implications for understanding vulnerability and resilience to fear-related psychiatric disorders.",
keywords = "Extinction, Fear conditioning, Memory, Reinforcement learning, Spontaneous recovery",
author = "Gershman, {Samuel J.} and Catherine Hartley",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3758/s13420-015-0176-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "243--250",
journal = "Learning and Behavior",
issn = "1543-4494",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in learning predict the return of fear

AU - Gershman, Samuel J.

AU - Hartley, Catherine

PY - 2015/9/28

Y1 - 2015/9/28

N2 - Using a laboratory analogue of learned fear (Pavlovian fear conditioning), we show that there is substantial heterogeneity across individuals in spontaneous recovery of fear following extinction training. We propose that this heterogeneity might stem from qualitative individual differences in the nature of extinction learning. Whereas some individuals tend to form a new memory during extinction, leaving their fear memory intact, others update the original threat association with new safety information, effectively unlearning the fear memory. We formalize this account in a computational model of fear learning and show that individuals who, according to the model, are more likely to form new extinction memories tend to show greater spontaneous recovery compared to individuals who appear to only update a single memory. This qualitative variation in fear and extinction learning may have important implications for understanding vulnerability and resilience to fear-related psychiatric disorders.

AB - Using a laboratory analogue of learned fear (Pavlovian fear conditioning), we show that there is substantial heterogeneity across individuals in spontaneous recovery of fear following extinction training. We propose that this heterogeneity might stem from qualitative individual differences in the nature of extinction learning. Whereas some individuals tend to form a new memory during extinction, leaving their fear memory intact, others update the original threat association with new safety information, effectively unlearning the fear memory. We formalize this account in a computational model of fear learning and show that individuals who, according to the model, are more likely to form new extinction memories tend to show greater spontaneous recovery compared to individuals who appear to only update a single memory. This qualitative variation in fear and extinction learning may have important implications for understanding vulnerability and resilience to fear-related psychiatric disorders.

KW - Extinction

KW - Fear conditioning

KW - Memory

KW - Reinforcement learning

KW - Spontaneous recovery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938207414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938207414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13420-015-0176-z

DO - 10.3758/s13420-015-0176-z

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 243

EP - 250

JO - Learning and Behavior

JF - Learning and Behavior

SN - 1543-4494

IS - 3

ER -