Indicators of dependence for different types of tobacco product users

Descriptive findings from Wave 1 (2013–2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study

David R. Strong, Jennifer Pearson, Sarah Ehlke, Thomas Kirchner, David Abrams, Kristie Taylor, Wilson M. Compton, Kevin P. Conway, Elizabeth Lambert, Victoria R. Green, Lynn C. Hull, Sarah E. Evans, K. Michael Cummings, Maciej Goniewicz, Andrew Hyland, Raymond Niaura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and aims With no established standard for assessing tobacco dependence (TD) across tobacco products in surveys, the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study provides a unique platform for examining the psychometric properties and validity of multiple indicators of tobacco dependence across a range of tobacco products. Participants A U.S. nationally representative sample from the 32,320 adult Wave 1 interviews with analyses focused on 14,287 respondents who were current established users of tobacco products. Findings This analysis confirms a single primary latent construct underlying responses to TD indicators for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco products. Mutually exclusive past year tobacco-user groups included: cigarette only (n = 8689), e-cigarette only (n = 437), cigar only (traditional, cigarillo, or filtered) (n = 706), hookah only (n = 461), smokeless tobacco only (n = 971), cigarette plus e-cigarette (n = 709), and multiple tobacco product users (n = 2314). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analyses supported use of 16 of the 24 examined TD indicators for comparisons across tobacco users. With cigarette users as a reference (mean = 0.0, SD = 1.0), we observed a range of TD with hookah (mean = −1.71) and cigar (mean = −1.92) only users being the lowest, and cigarette plus e-cigarette product users being the highest (mean = 0.35). Regression models including sociodemographic factors supported concurrent validity with increased product use frequency and TD among cigarette-only (p < 0.001), e-cigarette only (p < 0.002), cigar (p < 0.001), hookah only (p < 0.001), and smokeless tobacco users (p < 0.001). Conclusion The PATH Study Adult Wave 1 Questionnaire provided psychometrically valid measures of TD that enables future regulatory investigations of nicotine dependence across tobacco products.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-266
Number of pages10
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume178
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Tobacco Products
Health
Tobacco Use Disorder
Population
Smokeless Tobacco

Keywords

  • E-cigarette dependence
  • Item response theory
  • Nicotine dependence
  • Poly-tobacco dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Indicators of dependence for different types of tobacco product users : Descriptive findings from Wave 1 (2013–2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. / Strong, David R.; Pearson, Jennifer; Ehlke, Sarah; Kirchner, Thomas; Abrams, David; Taylor, Kristie; Compton, Wilson M.; Conway, Kevin P.; Lambert, Elizabeth; Green, Victoria R.; Hull, Lynn C.; Evans, Sarah E.; Cummings, K. Michael; Goniewicz, Maciej; Hyland, Andrew; Niaura, Raymond.

In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 178, 01.09.2017, p. 257-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Strong, David R. ; Pearson, Jennifer ; Ehlke, Sarah ; Kirchner, Thomas ; Abrams, David ; Taylor, Kristie ; Compton, Wilson M. ; Conway, Kevin P. ; Lambert, Elizabeth ; Green, Victoria R. ; Hull, Lynn C. ; Evans, Sarah E. ; Cummings, K. Michael ; Goniewicz, Maciej ; Hyland, Andrew ; Niaura, Raymond. / Indicators of dependence for different types of tobacco product users : Descriptive findings from Wave 1 (2013–2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2017 ; Vol. 178. pp. 257-266.
@article{b790f86076bf4397b5d1070f74119e83,
title = "Indicators of dependence for different types of tobacco product users: Descriptive findings from Wave 1 (2013–2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study",
abstract = "Background and aims With no established standard for assessing tobacco dependence (TD) across tobacco products in surveys, the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study provides a unique platform for examining the psychometric properties and validity of multiple indicators of tobacco dependence across a range of tobacco products. Participants A U.S. nationally representative sample from the 32,320 adult Wave 1 interviews with analyses focused on 14,287 respondents who were current established users of tobacco products. Findings This analysis confirms a single primary latent construct underlying responses to TD indicators for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco products. Mutually exclusive past year tobacco-user groups included: cigarette only (n = 8689), e-cigarette only (n = 437), cigar only (traditional, cigarillo, or filtered) (n = 706), hookah only (n = 461), smokeless tobacco only (n = 971), cigarette plus e-cigarette (n = 709), and multiple tobacco product users (n = 2314). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analyses supported use of 16 of the 24 examined TD indicators for comparisons across tobacco users. With cigarette users as a reference (mean = 0.0, SD = 1.0), we observed a range of TD with hookah (mean = −1.71) and cigar (mean = −1.92) only users being the lowest, and cigarette plus e-cigarette product users being the highest (mean = 0.35). Regression models including sociodemographic factors supported concurrent validity with increased product use frequency and TD among cigarette-only (p < 0.001), e-cigarette only (p < 0.002), cigar (p < 0.001), hookah only (p < 0.001), and smokeless tobacco users (p < 0.001). Conclusion The PATH Study Adult Wave 1 Questionnaire provided psychometrically valid measures of TD that enables future regulatory investigations of nicotine dependence across tobacco products.",
keywords = "E-cigarette dependence, Item response theory, Nicotine dependence, Poly-tobacco dependence",
author = "Strong, {David R.} and Jennifer Pearson and Sarah Ehlke and Thomas Kirchner and David Abrams and Kristie Taylor and Compton, {Wilson M.} and Conway, {Kevin P.} and Elizabeth Lambert and Green, {Victoria R.} and Hull, {Lynn C.} and Evans, {Sarah E.} and Cummings, {K. Michael} and Maciej Goniewicz and Andrew Hyland and Raymond Niaura",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "178",
pages = "257--266",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indicators of dependence for different types of tobacco product users

T2 - Descriptive findings from Wave 1 (2013–2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study

AU - Strong, David R.

AU - Pearson, Jennifer

AU - Ehlke, Sarah

AU - Kirchner, Thomas

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Taylor, Kristie

AU - Compton, Wilson M.

AU - Conway, Kevin P.

AU - Lambert, Elizabeth

AU - Green, Victoria R.

AU - Hull, Lynn C.

AU - Evans, Sarah E.

AU - Cummings, K. Michael

AU - Goniewicz, Maciej

AU - Hyland, Andrew

AU - Niaura, Raymond

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Background and aims With no established standard for assessing tobacco dependence (TD) across tobacco products in surveys, the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study provides a unique platform for examining the psychometric properties and validity of multiple indicators of tobacco dependence across a range of tobacco products. Participants A U.S. nationally representative sample from the 32,320 adult Wave 1 interviews with analyses focused on 14,287 respondents who were current established users of tobacco products. Findings This analysis confirms a single primary latent construct underlying responses to TD indicators for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco products. Mutually exclusive past year tobacco-user groups included: cigarette only (n = 8689), e-cigarette only (n = 437), cigar only (traditional, cigarillo, or filtered) (n = 706), hookah only (n = 461), smokeless tobacco only (n = 971), cigarette plus e-cigarette (n = 709), and multiple tobacco product users (n = 2314). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analyses supported use of 16 of the 24 examined TD indicators for comparisons across tobacco users. With cigarette users as a reference (mean = 0.0, SD = 1.0), we observed a range of TD with hookah (mean = −1.71) and cigar (mean = −1.92) only users being the lowest, and cigarette plus e-cigarette product users being the highest (mean = 0.35). Regression models including sociodemographic factors supported concurrent validity with increased product use frequency and TD among cigarette-only (p < 0.001), e-cigarette only (p < 0.002), cigar (p < 0.001), hookah only (p < 0.001), and smokeless tobacco users (p < 0.001). Conclusion The PATH Study Adult Wave 1 Questionnaire provided psychometrically valid measures of TD that enables future regulatory investigations of nicotine dependence across tobacco products.

AB - Background and aims With no established standard for assessing tobacco dependence (TD) across tobacco products in surveys, the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study provides a unique platform for examining the psychometric properties and validity of multiple indicators of tobacco dependence across a range of tobacco products. Participants A U.S. nationally representative sample from the 32,320 adult Wave 1 interviews with analyses focused on 14,287 respondents who were current established users of tobacco products. Findings This analysis confirms a single primary latent construct underlying responses to TD indicators for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco products. Mutually exclusive past year tobacco-user groups included: cigarette only (n = 8689), e-cigarette only (n = 437), cigar only (traditional, cigarillo, or filtered) (n = 706), hookah only (n = 461), smokeless tobacco only (n = 971), cigarette plus e-cigarette (n = 709), and multiple tobacco product users (n = 2314). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analyses supported use of 16 of the 24 examined TD indicators for comparisons across tobacco users. With cigarette users as a reference (mean = 0.0, SD = 1.0), we observed a range of TD with hookah (mean = −1.71) and cigar (mean = −1.92) only users being the lowest, and cigarette plus e-cigarette product users being the highest (mean = 0.35). Regression models including sociodemographic factors supported concurrent validity with increased product use frequency and TD among cigarette-only (p < 0.001), e-cigarette only (p < 0.002), cigar (p < 0.001), hookah only (p < 0.001), and smokeless tobacco users (p < 0.001). Conclusion The PATH Study Adult Wave 1 Questionnaire provided psychometrically valid measures of TD that enables future regulatory investigations of nicotine dependence across tobacco products.

KW - E-cigarette dependence

KW - Item response theory

KW - Nicotine dependence

KW - Poly-tobacco dependence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021645048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021645048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.010

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.010

M3 - Article

VL - 178

SP - 257

EP - 266

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

ER -