Indeterminacy in brain and behavior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The central goal of modern science that evolved during the Enlightenment was the empirical reduction of uncertainty by experimental inquiry. Although there have been challenges to this view in the physical sciences, where profoundly indeterminate events have been identified at the quantum level, the presumption that physical phenomena are fundamentally determinate seems to have defined modern behavioral science. Programs like those of the classical behaviorists, for example, were explicitly anchored to a fully deterministic worldview, and this anchoring clearly influenced the experiments that those scientists chose to perform. Recent advances in the psychological, social, and neural sciences, however, have caused a number of scholars to begin to question the assumption that all of behavior can be regarded as fundamentally deterministic in character. Although it is not yet clear whether the generative mechanisms for human and animal behavior will require a philosophically indeterminate approach, it is clear that behavioral scientists of all kinds are beginning to engage the issues of indeterminacy that plagued physics at the beginning of the twentieth century.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-56
Number of pages32
JournalAnnual Review of Psychology
Volume56
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Physical Phenomena
Behavioral Sciences
Natural Science Disciplines
Animal Behavior
Physics
Brain
Uncertainty
Psychology

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Decision-making
  • Game theory
  • Randomness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Indeterminacy in brain and behavior. / Glimcher, Paul.

In: Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 56, 2005, p. 25-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ae58c9347424eedb72697aeafda78a4,
title = "Indeterminacy in brain and behavior",
abstract = "The central goal of modern science that evolved during the Enlightenment was the empirical reduction of uncertainty by experimental inquiry. Although there have been challenges to this view in the physical sciences, where profoundly indeterminate events have been identified at the quantum level, the presumption that physical phenomena are fundamentally determinate seems to have defined modern behavioral science. Programs like those of the classical behaviorists, for example, were explicitly anchored to a fully deterministic worldview, and this anchoring clearly influenced the experiments that those scientists chose to perform. Recent advances in the psychological, social, and neural sciences, however, have caused a number of scholars to begin to question the assumption that all of behavior can be regarded as fundamentally deterministic in character. Although it is not yet clear whether the generative mechanisms for human and animal behavior will require a philosophically indeterminate approach, it is clear that behavioral scientists of all kinds are beginning to engage the issues of indeterminacy that plagued physics at the beginning of the twentieth century.",
keywords = "Choice, Decision-making, Game theory, Randomness",
author = "Paul Glimcher",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141429",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "25--56",
journal = "Annual Review of Psychology",
issn = "0066-4308",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indeterminacy in brain and behavior

AU - Glimcher, Paul

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The central goal of modern science that evolved during the Enlightenment was the empirical reduction of uncertainty by experimental inquiry. Although there have been challenges to this view in the physical sciences, where profoundly indeterminate events have been identified at the quantum level, the presumption that physical phenomena are fundamentally determinate seems to have defined modern behavioral science. Programs like those of the classical behaviorists, for example, were explicitly anchored to a fully deterministic worldview, and this anchoring clearly influenced the experiments that those scientists chose to perform. Recent advances in the psychological, social, and neural sciences, however, have caused a number of scholars to begin to question the assumption that all of behavior can be regarded as fundamentally deterministic in character. Although it is not yet clear whether the generative mechanisms for human and animal behavior will require a philosophically indeterminate approach, it is clear that behavioral scientists of all kinds are beginning to engage the issues of indeterminacy that plagued physics at the beginning of the twentieth century.

AB - The central goal of modern science that evolved during the Enlightenment was the empirical reduction of uncertainty by experimental inquiry. Although there have been challenges to this view in the physical sciences, where profoundly indeterminate events have been identified at the quantum level, the presumption that physical phenomena are fundamentally determinate seems to have defined modern behavioral science. Programs like those of the classical behaviorists, for example, were explicitly anchored to a fully deterministic worldview, and this anchoring clearly influenced the experiments that those scientists chose to perform. Recent advances in the psychological, social, and neural sciences, however, have caused a number of scholars to begin to question the assumption that all of behavior can be regarded as fundamentally deterministic in character. Although it is not yet clear whether the generative mechanisms for human and animal behavior will require a philosophically indeterminate approach, it is clear that behavioral scientists of all kinds are beginning to engage the issues of indeterminacy that plagued physics at the beginning of the twentieth century.

KW - Choice

KW - Decision-making

KW - Game theory

KW - Randomness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5144228089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5144228089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141429

DO - 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141429

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 25

EP - 56

JO - Annual Review of Psychology

JF - Annual Review of Psychology

SN - 0066-4308

ER -