Increased water charges improve efficiency and equity in an irrigation system

Andrew Bell, Patrick S. Ward, M. Azeem Ali Shah

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Conventional wisdom in many agricultural systems across the world is that farmers cannot, will not, or should not pay the full costs associated with surface water delivery. Across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, only a handful can claim complete recovery of operation, maintenance, and capital costs; across Central and South Asia, fees are lower still, with farmers in Nepal, India, and Kazakhstan paying fractions of a U.S. penny for a cubic meter of water. In Pakistan, fees amount to roughly USD 1-2 per acre per season. However, farmers in Pakistan spend orders of magnitude more for diesel fuel to pump groundwater each season, suggesting a latent willingness to spend for water that, under the right conditions, could potentially be directed toward water-use fees for surface water supply. Although overall performance could be expected to improve with greater cost recovery, asymmetric access to water in canal irrigation systems leaves the question open as to whether those benefits would be equitably shared among all farmers in the system. We develop an agent-based model (ABM) of a small irrigation command to examine efficiency and equity outcomes across a range of different cost structures for the maintenance of the system, levels of market development, and assessed water charges. We find that, robust to a range of different cost and structural conditions, increased water charges lead to gains in both efficiency and concomitant improvements in equity as investments in canal infrastructure and system maintenance improve the conveyance of water resources further down watercourses. This suggests that, under conditions in which (1) farmers are currently spending money to pump groundwater to compensate for a failing surface water system, and (2) there is the possibility that through initial investment to provide perceptibly better water supply, genuine win-win solutions can be attained through higher water-use fees to beneficiary farmers.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number23
    JournalEcology and Society
    Volume21
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    irrigation system
    equity
    cost
    surface water
    water use
    canal
    pump
    water
    water supply
    market development
    groundwater
    OECD
    farming system
    water resource
    infrastructure
    irrigation
    fee

    Keywords

    • Agent-based model
    • Efficiency
    • Equity
    • Irrigation
    • Pakistan
    • Water

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology

    Cite this

    Increased water charges improve efficiency and equity in an irrigation system. / Bell, Andrew; Ward, Patrick S.; Shah, M. Azeem Ali.

    In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 3, 23, 2016.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bell, Andrew ; Ward, Patrick S. ; Shah, M. Azeem Ali. / Increased water charges improve efficiency and equity in an irrigation system. In: Ecology and Society. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 3.
    @article{5a390ac021bb47728d161a65b8c36690,
    title = "Increased water charges improve efficiency and equity in an irrigation system",
    abstract = "Conventional wisdom in many agricultural systems across the world is that farmers cannot, will not, or should not pay the full costs associated with surface water delivery. Across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, only a handful can claim complete recovery of operation, maintenance, and capital costs; across Central and South Asia, fees are lower still, with farmers in Nepal, India, and Kazakhstan paying fractions of a U.S. penny for a cubic meter of water. In Pakistan, fees amount to roughly USD 1-2 per acre per season. However, farmers in Pakistan spend orders of magnitude more for diesel fuel to pump groundwater each season, suggesting a latent willingness to spend for water that, under the right conditions, could potentially be directed toward water-use fees for surface water supply. Although overall performance could be expected to improve with greater cost recovery, asymmetric access to water in canal irrigation systems leaves the question open as to whether those benefits would be equitably shared among all farmers in the system. We develop an agent-based model (ABM) of a small irrigation command to examine efficiency and equity outcomes across a range of different cost structures for the maintenance of the system, levels of market development, and assessed water charges. We find that, robust to a range of different cost and structural conditions, increased water charges lead to gains in both efficiency and concomitant improvements in equity as investments in canal infrastructure and system maintenance improve the conveyance of water resources further down watercourses. This suggests that, under conditions in which (1) farmers are currently spending money to pump groundwater to compensate for a failing surface water system, and (2) there is the possibility that through initial investment to provide perceptibly better water supply, genuine win-win solutions can be attained through higher water-use fees to beneficiary farmers.",
    keywords = "Agent-based model, Efficiency, Equity, Irrigation, Pakistan, Water",
    author = "Andrew Bell and Ward, {Patrick S.} and Shah, {M. Azeem Ali}",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.5751/ES-08642-210323",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "21",
    journal = "Ecology and Society",
    issn = "1708-3087",
    publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Increased water charges improve efficiency and equity in an irrigation system

    AU - Bell, Andrew

    AU - Ward, Patrick S.

    AU - Shah, M. Azeem Ali

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Conventional wisdom in many agricultural systems across the world is that farmers cannot, will not, or should not pay the full costs associated with surface water delivery. Across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, only a handful can claim complete recovery of operation, maintenance, and capital costs; across Central and South Asia, fees are lower still, with farmers in Nepal, India, and Kazakhstan paying fractions of a U.S. penny for a cubic meter of water. In Pakistan, fees amount to roughly USD 1-2 per acre per season. However, farmers in Pakistan spend orders of magnitude more for diesel fuel to pump groundwater each season, suggesting a latent willingness to spend for water that, under the right conditions, could potentially be directed toward water-use fees for surface water supply. Although overall performance could be expected to improve with greater cost recovery, asymmetric access to water in canal irrigation systems leaves the question open as to whether those benefits would be equitably shared among all farmers in the system. We develop an agent-based model (ABM) of a small irrigation command to examine efficiency and equity outcomes across a range of different cost structures for the maintenance of the system, levels of market development, and assessed water charges. We find that, robust to a range of different cost and structural conditions, increased water charges lead to gains in both efficiency and concomitant improvements in equity as investments in canal infrastructure and system maintenance improve the conveyance of water resources further down watercourses. This suggests that, under conditions in which (1) farmers are currently spending money to pump groundwater to compensate for a failing surface water system, and (2) there is the possibility that through initial investment to provide perceptibly better water supply, genuine win-win solutions can be attained through higher water-use fees to beneficiary farmers.

    AB - Conventional wisdom in many agricultural systems across the world is that farmers cannot, will not, or should not pay the full costs associated with surface water delivery. Across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, only a handful can claim complete recovery of operation, maintenance, and capital costs; across Central and South Asia, fees are lower still, with farmers in Nepal, India, and Kazakhstan paying fractions of a U.S. penny for a cubic meter of water. In Pakistan, fees amount to roughly USD 1-2 per acre per season. However, farmers in Pakistan spend orders of magnitude more for diesel fuel to pump groundwater each season, suggesting a latent willingness to spend for water that, under the right conditions, could potentially be directed toward water-use fees for surface water supply. Although overall performance could be expected to improve with greater cost recovery, asymmetric access to water in canal irrigation systems leaves the question open as to whether those benefits would be equitably shared among all farmers in the system. We develop an agent-based model (ABM) of a small irrigation command to examine efficiency and equity outcomes across a range of different cost structures for the maintenance of the system, levels of market development, and assessed water charges. We find that, robust to a range of different cost and structural conditions, increased water charges lead to gains in both efficiency and concomitant improvements in equity as investments in canal infrastructure and system maintenance improve the conveyance of water resources further down watercourses. This suggests that, under conditions in which (1) farmers are currently spending money to pump groundwater to compensate for a failing surface water system, and (2) there is the possibility that through initial investment to provide perceptibly better water supply, genuine win-win solutions can be attained through higher water-use fees to beneficiary farmers.

    KW - Agent-based model

    KW - Efficiency

    KW - Equity

    KW - Irrigation

    KW - Pakistan

    KW - Water

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989172725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989172725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.5751/ES-08642-210323

    DO - 10.5751/ES-08642-210323

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84989172725

    VL - 21

    JO - Ecology and Society

    JF - Ecology and Society

    SN - 1708-3087

    IS - 3

    M1 - 23

    ER -