In the "best interest" of immigrant and refugee children: Deliberating on their unique circumstances

Qingwen Xu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Each year, state juvenile courts provide thousands of immigrant and refugee children with access to consistent and reliable caregiving and a stable environment. To examine how courts interpret "the best interests" of immigrant and refugee children, this article examines 24 cases in courts across the United States, which indicate they use a territorial approach when evaluating the best interests standard. Although legal status was not an issue, many related factors were. Consequently, the courts restricted immigrant parents' rights in caring, guiding, and visiting their children; increased the risk of wrongfully terminating parental rights; and intensified the unpredictability of immigrant and refugee children's welfare in the long run. This article suggests an approach that encourages communication between social workers and the courts to address the special needs and circumstances of immigrant and refugee children on three key topics: the material and moral welfare of the child, and social welfare for immigrant and refugee families.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)747-770
    Number of pages24
    JournalChild Welfare
    Volume84
    Issue number5
    StatePublished - Sep 1 2005

    Fingerprint

    Refugees
    Child Welfare
    Social Welfare
    Jurisprudence
    Parents
    Communication

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    In the "best interest" of immigrant and refugee children : Deliberating on their unique circumstances. / Xu, Qingwen.

    In: Child Welfare, Vol. 84, No. 5, 01.09.2005, p. 747-770.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{3165599a2ed74c53a6e39e281f1c8ba1,
    title = "In the {"}best interest{"} of immigrant and refugee children: Deliberating on their unique circumstances",
    abstract = "Each year, state juvenile courts provide thousands of immigrant and refugee children with access to consistent and reliable caregiving and a stable environment. To examine how courts interpret {"}the best interests{"} of immigrant and refugee children, this article examines 24 cases in courts across the United States, which indicate they use a territorial approach when evaluating the best interests standard. Although legal status was not an issue, many related factors were. Consequently, the courts restricted immigrant parents' rights in caring, guiding, and visiting their children; increased the risk of wrongfully terminating parental rights; and intensified the unpredictability of immigrant and refugee children's welfare in the long run. This article suggests an approach that encourages communication between social workers and the courts to address the special needs and circumstances of immigrant and refugee children on three key topics: the material and moral welfare of the child, and social welfare for immigrant and refugee families.",
    author = "Qingwen Xu",
    year = "2005",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "84",
    pages = "747--770",
    journal = "Child Welfare",
    issn = "0009-4021",
    publisher = "Child Welfare League of America, Inc.",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - In the "best interest" of immigrant and refugee children

    T2 - Deliberating on their unique circumstances

    AU - Xu, Qingwen

    PY - 2005/9/1

    Y1 - 2005/9/1

    N2 - Each year, state juvenile courts provide thousands of immigrant and refugee children with access to consistent and reliable caregiving and a stable environment. To examine how courts interpret "the best interests" of immigrant and refugee children, this article examines 24 cases in courts across the United States, which indicate they use a territorial approach when evaluating the best interests standard. Although legal status was not an issue, many related factors were. Consequently, the courts restricted immigrant parents' rights in caring, guiding, and visiting their children; increased the risk of wrongfully terminating parental rights; and intensified the unpredictability of immigrant and refugee children's welfare in the long run. This article suggests an approach that encourages communication between social workers and the courts to address the special needs and circumstances of immigrant and refugee children on three key topics: the material and moral welfare of the child, and social welfare for immigrant and refugee families.

    AB - Each year, state juvenile courts provide thousands of immigrant and refugee children with access to consistent and reliable caregiving and a stable environment. To examine how courts interpret "the best interests" of immigrant and refugee children, this article examines 24 cases in courts across the United States, which indicate they use a territorial approach when evaluating the best interests standard. Although legal status was not an issue, many related factors were. Consequently, the courts restricted immigrant parents' rights in caring, guiding, and visiting their children; increased the risk of wrongfully terminating parental rights; and intensified the unpredictability of immigrant and refugee children's welfare in the long run. This article suggests an approach that encourages communication between social workers and the courts to address the special needs and circumstances of immigrant and refugee children on three key topics: the material and moral welfare of the child, and social welfare for immigrant and refugee families.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27844473332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27844473332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 16435660

    AN - SCOPUS:27844473332

    VL - 84

    SP - 747

    EP - 770

    JO - Child Welfare

    JF - Child Welfare

    SN - 0009-4021

    IS - 5

    ER -