Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Jeffrey M. Lackner, James Jaccard, Laurie Keefer, Darren M. Brenner, Rebecca S. Firth, Gregory D. Gudleski, Frank A. Hamilton, Leonard A. Katz, Susan S. Krasner, Chang Xing Ma, Christopher D. Radziwon, Michael D. Sitrin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background & Aims: There is an urgent need for safe treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that relieve treatment-refractory symptoms and their societal and economic burden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment that has not been broadly adopted into routine clinical practice. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess clinical responses to home-based CBT compared with clinic-based CBT and patient education. Methods: We performed a prospective study of 436 patients with IBS, based on Rome III criteria, at 2 tertiary centers from August 23, 2010, through October 21, 2016. Subjects (41.4 ± 14.8 years old; 80% women) were randomly assigned to groups that received the following: standard-CBT (S-CBT, n = 146, comprising 10 weekly, 60-minute sessions that emphasized the provision of information about brain-gut interactions; self-monitoring of symptoms, their triggers, and consequences; muscle relaxation; worry control; flexible problem solving; and relapse prevention training), or 4 sessions of primarily home-based CBT requiring minimal therapist contact (MC-CBT, n = 145), in which patients received home-study materials covering the same procedures as S-CBT), or 4 sessions of IBS education (EDU, n = 145) that provided support and information about IBS and the role of lifestyle factors such as stress, diet, and exercise. The primary outcome was global improvement of IBS symptoms, based on the IBS-version of the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Ratings were performed by patients and board-certified gastroenterologists blinded to treatment allocation. Efficacy data were collected 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment completion. Results: A higher proportion of patients receiving MC-CBT reported moderate to substantial improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms 2 weeks after treatment (61.0% based on ratings by patients and 55.7% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) than those receiving EDU (43.5% based on ratings patients and 40.4% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) (P <.05). Gastrointestinal symptom improvement, rated by gastroenterologists, 6 months after the end of treatment also differed significantly between the MC-CBT (58.4%) and EDU groups (44.8%) (P =.05). Formal equivalence testing applied across multiple contrasts indicated that MC-CBT is at least as effective as S-CBT in improving IBS symptoms. Patients tended to be more satisfied with CBT vs EDU (P <.05) based on immediate posttreatment responses to the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Symptom improvement was not significantly related to concomitant use of medications. Conclusions: In a randomized controlled trial, we found that a primarily home-based version of CBT produced significant and sustained gastrointestinal symptom improvement for patients with IBS compared with education. Clinicaltrials.gov no.: NCT00738920.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-57
Number of pages11
JournalGastroenterology
Volume155
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Cognitive Therapy
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Education
Muscle Relaxation
Patient Education
Secondary Prevention
Life Style

Keywords

  • Brain-Gut Interactions
  • Disease Management
  • Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder
  • Value-Based Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome. / Lackner, Jeffrey M.; Jaccard, James; Keefer, Laurie; Brenner, Darren M.; Firth, Rebecca S.; Gudleski, Gregory D.; Hamilton, Frank A.; Katz, Leonard A.; Krasner, Susan S.; Ma, Chang Xing; Radziwon, Christopher D.; Sitrin, Michael D.

In: Gastroenterology, Vol. 155, No. 1, 01.07.2018, p. 47-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lackner, JM, Jaccard, J, Keefer, L, Brenner, DM, Firth, RS, Gudleski, GD, Hamilton, FA, Katz, LA, Krasner, SS, Ma, CX, Radziwon, CD & Sitrin, MD 2018, 'Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome', Gastroenterology, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.063
Lackner, Jeffrey M. ; Jaccard, James ; Keefer, Laurie ; Brenner, Darren M. ; Firth, Rebecca S. ; Gudleski, Gregory D. ; Hamilton, Frank A. ; Katz, Leonard A. ; Krasner, Susan S. ; Ma, Chang Xing ; Radziwon, Christopher D. ; Sitrin, Michael D. / Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome. In: Gastroenterology. 2018 ; Vol. 155, No. 1. pp. 47-57.
@article{48101ac57acd4e509df713bc5d346fa0,
title = "Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome",
abstract = "Background & Aims: There is an urgent need for safe treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that relieve treatment-refractory symptoms and their societal and economic burden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment that has not been broadly adopted into routine clinical practice. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess clinical responses to home-based CBT compared with clinic-based CBT and patient education. Methods: We performed a prospective study of 436 patients with IBS, based on Rome III criteria, at 2 tertiary centers from August 23, 2010, through October 21, 2016. Subjects (41.4 ± 14.8 years old; 80{\%} women) were randomly assigned to groups that received the following: standard-CBT (S-CBT, n = 146, comprising 10 weekly, 60-minute sessions that emphasized the provision of information about brain-gut interactions; self-monitoring of symptoms, their triggers, and consequences; muscle relaxation; worry control; flexible problem solving; and relapse prevention training), or 4 sessions of primarily home-based CBT requiring minimal therapist contact (MC-CBT, n = 145), in which patients received home-study materials covering the same procedures as S-CBT), or 4 sessions of IBS education (EDU, n = 145) that provided support and information about IBS and the role of lifestyle factors such as stress, diet, and exercise. The primary outcome was global improvement of IBS symptoms, based on the IBS-version of the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Ratings were performed by patients and board-certified gastroenterologists blinded to treatment allocation. Efficacy data were collected 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment completion. Results: A higher proportion of patients receiving MC-CBT reported moderate to substantial improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms 2 weeks after treatment (61.0{\%} based on ratings by patients and 55.7{\%} based on ratings by gastroenterologists) than those receiving EDU (43.5{\%} based on ratings patients and 40.4{\%} based on ratings by gastroenterologists) (P <.05). Gastrointestinal symptom improvement, rated by gastroenterologists, 6 months after the end of treatment also differed significantly between the MC-CBT (58.4{\%}) and EDU groups (44.8{\%}) (P =.05). Formal equivalence testing applied across multiple contrasts indicated that MC-CBT is at least as effective as S-CBT in improving IBS symptoms. Patients tended to be more satisfied with CBT vs EDU (P <.05) based on immediate posttreatment responses to the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Symptom improvement was not significantly related to concomitant use of medications. Conclusions: In a randomized controlled trial, we found that a primarily home-based version of CBT produced significant and sustained gastrointestinal symptom improvement for patients with IBS compared with education. Clinicaltrials.gov no.: NCT00738920.",
keywords = "Brain-Gut Interactions, Disease Management, Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder, Value-Based Health Care",
author = "Lackner, {Jeffrey M.} and James Jaccard and Laurie Keefer and Brenner, {Darren M.} and Firth, {Rebecca S.} and Gudleski, {Gregory D.} and Hamilton, {Frank A.} and Katz, {Leonard A.} and Krasner, {Susan S.} and Ma, {Chang Xing} and Radziwon, {Christopher D.} and Sitrin, {Michael D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.063",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "47--57",
journal = "Gastroenterology",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome

AU - Lackner, Jeffrey M.

AU - Jaccard, James

AU - Keefer, Laurie

AU - Brenner, Darren M.

AU - Firth, Rebecca S.

AU - Gudleski, Gregory D.

AU - Hamilton, Frank A.

AU - Katz, Leonard A.

AU - Krasner, Susan S.

AU - Ma, Chang Xing

AU - Radziwon, Christopher D.

AU - Sitrin, Michael D.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background & Aims: There is an urgent need for safe treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that relieve treatment-refractory symptoms and their societal and economic burden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment that has not been broadly adopted into routine clinical practice. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess clinical responses to home-based CBT compared with clinic-based CBT and patient education. Methods: We performed a prospective study of 436 patients with IBS, based on Rome III criteria, at 2 tertiary centers from August 23, 2010, through October 21, 2016. Subjects (41.4 ± 14.8 years old; 80% women) were randomly assigned to groups that received the following: standard-CBT (S-CBT, n = 146, comprising 10 weekly, 60-minute sessions that emphasized the provision of information about brain-gut interactions; self-monitoring of symptoms, their triggers, and consequences; muscle relaxation; worry control; flexible problem solving; and relapse prevention training), or 4 sessions of primarily home-based CBT requiring minimal therapist contact (MC-CBT, n = 145), in which patients received home-study materials covering the same procedures as S-CBT), or 4 sessions of IBS education (EDU, n = 145) that provided support and information about IBS and the role of lifestyle factors such as stress, diet, and exercise. The primary outcome was global improvement of IBS symptoms, based on the IBS-version of the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Ratings were performed by patients and board-certified gastroenterologists blinded to treatment allocation. Efficacy data were collected 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment completion. Results: A higher proportion of patients receiving MC-CBT reported moderate to substantial improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms 2 weeks after treatment (61.0% based on ratings by patients and 55.7% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) than those receiving EDU (43.5% based on ratings patients and 40.4% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) (P <.05). Gastrointestinal symptom improvement, rated by gastroenterologists, 6 months after the end of treatment also differed significantly between the MC-CBT (58.4%) and EDU groups (44.8%) (P =.05). Formal equivalence testing applied across multiple contrasts indicated that MC-CBT is at least as effective as S-CBT in improving IBS symptoms. Patients tended to be more satisfied with CBT vs EDU (P <.05) based on immediate posttreatment responses to the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Symptom improvement was not significantly related to concomitant use of medications. Conclusions: In a randomized controlled trial, we found that a primarily home-based version of CBT produced significant and sustained gastrointestinal symptom improvement for patients with IBS compared with education. Clinicaltrials.gov no.: NCT00738920.

AB - Background & Aims: There is an urgent need for safe treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that relieve treatment-refractory symptoms and their societal and economic burden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment that has not been broadly adopted into routine clinical practice. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess clinical responses to home-based CBT compared with clinic-based CBT and patient education. Methods: We performed a prospective study of 436 patients with IBS, based on Rome III criteria, at 2 tertiary centers from August 23, 2010, through October 21, 2016. Subjects (41.4 ± 14.8 years old; 80% women) were randomly assigned to groups that received the following: standard-CBT (S-CBT, n = 146, comprising 10 weekly, 60-minute sessions that emphasized the provision of information about brain-gut interactions; self-monitoring of symptoms, their triggers, and consequences; muscle relaxation; worry control; flexible problem solving; and relapse prevention training), or 4 sessions of primarily home-based CBT requiring minimal therapist contact (MC-CBT, n = 145), in which patients received home-study materials covering the same procedures as S-CBT), or 4 sessions of IBS education (EDU, n = 145) that provided support and information about IBS and the role of lifestyle factors such as stress, diet, and exercise. The primary outcome was global improvement of IBS symptoms, based on the IBS-version of the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Ratings were performed by patients and board-certified gastroenterologists blinded to treatment allocation. Efficacy data were collected 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment completion. Results: A higher proportion of patients receiving MC-CBT reported moderate to substantial improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms 2 weeks after treatment (61.0% based on ratings by patients and 55.7% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) than those receiving EDU (43.5% based on ratings patients and 40.4% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) (P <.05). Gastrointestinal symptom improvement, rated by gastroenterologists, 6 months after the end of treatment also differed significantly between the MC-CBT (58.4%) and EDU groups (44.8%) (P =.05). Formal equivalence testing applied across multiple contrasts indicated that MC-CBT is at least as effective as S-CBT in improving IBS symptoms. Patients tended to be more satisfied with CBT vs EDU (P <.05) based on immediate posttreatment responses to the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Symptom improvement was not significantly related to concomitant use of medications. Conclusions: In a randomized controlled trial, we found that a primarily home-based version of CBT produced significant and sustained gastrointestinal symptom improvement for patients with IBS compared with education. Clinicaltrials.gov no.: NCT00738920.

KW - Brain-Gut Interactions

KW - Disease Management

KW - Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder

KW - Value-Based Health Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049335584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049335584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.063

DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.063

M3 - Article

VL - 155

SP - 47

EP - 57

JO - Gastroenterology

JF - Gastroenterology

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 1

ER -