Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology

Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice

Martin S. Hagger, Aleksandra Luszczynska, John de Wit, Yael Benyamini, Silke Burkert, Pier Eric Chamberland, Angel Chater, Stephan U. Dombrowski, Anne van Dongen, David P. French, Aurelie Gauchet, Nelli Hankonen, Maria Karekla, Anita Y. Kinney, Dominika Kwasnicka, Siu Hing Lo, Sofía López-Roig, Carine Meslot, Marta Moreira Marques, Efrat Neter & 12 others Anne Marie Plass, Sebastian Potthoff, Laura Rennie, Urte Scholz, Gertraud Stadler, Elske Stolte, Gill ten Hoor, Aukje Verhoeven, Monika Wagner, Gabriele Oettingen, Paschal Sheeran, Peter Gollwitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The current article details a position statement and recommendations for future research and practice on planning and implementation intentions in health contexts endorsed by the Synergy Expert Group. The group comprised world-leading researchers in health and social psychology and behavioural medicine who convened to discuss priority issues in planning interventions in health contexts and develop a set of recommendations for future research and practice. The expert group adopted a nominal groups approach and voting system to elicit and structure priority issues in planning interventions and implementation intentions research. Forty-two priority issues identified in initial discussions were further condensed to 18 key issues, including definitions of planning and implementation intentions and 17 priority research areas. Each issue was subjected to voting for consensus among group members and formed the basis of the position statement and recommendations. Specifically, the expert group endorsed statements and recommendations in the following areas: generic definition of planning and specific definition of implementation intentions, recommendations for better testing of mechanisms, guidance on testing the effects of moderators of planning interventions, recommendations on the social aspects of planning interventions, identification of the preconditions that moderate effectiveness of planning interventions and recommendations for research on how people use plans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)814-839
Number of pages26
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

Fingerprint

Behavioral Medicine
Politics
Research
Social Psychology
Health
Consensus
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • cues-to-action
  • goal striving
  • if-then plans
  • implementation intentions
  • planning
  • volition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology : Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice. / Hagger, Martin S.; Luszczynska, Aleksandra; de Wit, John; Benyamini, Yael; Burkert, Silke; Chamberland, Pier Eric; Chater, Angel; Dombrowski, Stephan U.; van Dongen, Anne; French, David P.; Gauchet, Aurelie; Hankonen, Nelli; Karekla, Maria; Kinney, Anita Y.; Kwasnicka, Dominika; Hing Lo, Siu; López-Roig, Sofía; Meslot, Carine; Marques, Marta Moreira; Neter, Efrat; Plass, Anne Marie; Potthoff, Sebastian; Rennie, Laura; Scholz, Urte; Stadler, Gertraud; Stolte, Elske; ten Hoor, Gill; Verhoeven, Aukje; Wagner, Monika; Oettingen, Gabriele; Sheeran, Paschal; Gollwitzer, Peter.

In: Psychology and Health, Vol. 31, No. 7, 02.07.2016, p. 814-839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hagger, MS, Luszczynska, A, de Wit, J, Benyamini, Y, Burkert, S, Chamberland, PE, Chater, A, Dombrowski, SU, van Dongen, A, French, DP, Gauchet, A, Hankonen, N, Karekla, M, Kinney, AY, Kwasnicka, D, Hing Lo, S, López-Roig, S, Meslot, C, Marques, MM, Neter, E, Plass, AM, Potthoff, S, Rennie, L, Scholz, U, Stadler, G, Stolte, E, ten Hoor, G, Verhoeven, A, Wagner, M, Oettingen, G, Sheeran, P & Gollwitzer, P 2016, 'Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice', Psychology and Health, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 814-839. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719
Hagger, Martin S. ; Luszczynska, Aleksandra ; de Wit, John ; Benyamini, Yael ; Burkert, Silke ; Chamberland, Pier Eric ; Chater, Angel ; Dombrowski, Stephan U. ; van Dongen, Anne ; French, David P. ; Gauchet, Aurelie ; Hankonen, Nelli ; Karekla, Maria ; Kinney, Anita Y. ; Kwasnicka, Dominika ; Hing Lo, Siu ; López-Roig, Sofía ; Meslot, Carine ; Marques, Marta Moreira ; Neter, Efrat ; Plass, Anne Marie ; Potthoff, Sebastian ; Rennie, Laura ; Scholz, Urte ; Stadler, Gertraud ; Stolte, Elske ; ten Hoor, Gill ; Verhoeven, Aukje ; Wagner, Monika ; Oettingen, Gabriele ; Sheeran, Paschal ; Gollwitzer, Peter. / Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology : Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice. In: Psychology and Health. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 814-839.
@article{d2772ab5bdef4216b8a0c352456ae1c8,
title = "Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice",
abstract = "The current article details a position statement and recommendations for future research and practice on planning and implementation intentions in health contexts endorsed by the Synergy Expert Group. The group comprised world-leading researchers in health and social psychology and behavioural medicine who convened to discuss priority issues in planning interventions in health contexts and develop a set of recommendations for future research and practice. The expert group adopted a nominal groups approach and voting system to elicit and structure priority issues in planning interventions and implementation intentions research. Forty-two priority issues identified in initial discussions were further condensed to 18 key issues, including definitions of planning and implementation intentions and 17 priority research areas. Each issue was subjected to voting for consensus among group members and formed the basis of the position statement and recommendations. Specifically, the expert group endorsed statements and recommendations in the following areas: generic definition of planning and specific definition of implementation intentions, recommendations for better testing of mechanisms, guidance on testing the effects of moderators of planning interventions, recommendations on the social aspects of planning interventions, identification of the preconditions that moderate effectiveness of planning interventions and recommendations for research on how people use plans.",
keywords = "cues-to-action, goal striving, if-then plans, implementation intentions, planning, volition",
author = "Hagger, {Martin S.} and Aleksandra Luszczynska and {de Wit}, John and Yael Benyamini and Silke Burkert and Chamberland, {Pier Eric} and Angel Chater and Dombrowski, {Stephan U.} and {van Dongen}, Anne and French, {David P.} and Aurelie Gauchet and Nelli Hankonen and Maria Karekla and Kinney, {Anita Y.} and Dominika Kwasnicka and {Hing Lo}, Siu and Sof{\'i}a L{\'o}pez-Roig and Carine Meslot and Marques, {Marta Moreira} and Efrat Neter and Plass, {Anne Marie} and Sebastian Potthoff and Laura Rennie and Urte Scholz and Gertraud Stadler and Elske Stolte and {ten Hoor}, Gill and Aukje Verhoeven and Monika Wagner and Gabriele Oettingen and Paschal Sheeran and Peter Gollwitzer",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "814--839",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology

T2 - Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice

AU - Hagger, Martin S.

AU - Luszczynska, Aleksandra

AU - de Wit, John

AU - Benyamini, Yael

AU - Burkert, Silke

AU - Chamberland, Pier Eric

AU - Chater, Angel

AU - Dombrowski, Stephan U.

AU - van Dongen, Anne

AU - French, David P.

AU - Gauchet, Aurelie

AU - Hankonen, Nelli

AU - Karekla, Maria

AU - Kinney, Anita Y.

AU - Kwasnicka, Dominika

AU - Hing Lo, Siu

AU - López-Roig, Sofía

AU - Meslot, Carine

AU - Marques, Marta Moreira

AU - Neter, Efrat

AU - Plass, Anne Marie

AU - Potthoff, Sebastian

AU - Rennie, Laura

AU - Scholz, Urte

AU - Stadler, Gertraud

AU - Stolte, Elske

AU - ten Hoor, Gill

AU - Verhoeven, Aukje

AU - Wagner, Monika

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

AU - Sheeran, Paschal

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - The current article details a position statement and recommendations for future research and practice on planning and implementation intentions in health contexts endorsed by the Synergy Expert Group. The group comprised world-leading researchers in health and social psychology and behavioural medicine who convened to discuss priority issues in planning interventions in health contexts and develop a set of recommendations for future research and practice. The expert group adopted a nominal groups approach and voting system to elicit and structure priority issues in planning interventions and implementation intentions research. Forty-two priority issues identified in initial discussions were further condensed to 18 key issues, including definitions of planning and implementation intentions and 17 priority research areas. Each issue was subjected to voting for consensus among group members and formed the basis of the position statement and recommendations. Specifically, the expert group endorsed statements and recommendations in the following areas: generic definition of planning and specific definition of implementation intentions, recommendations for better testing of mechanisms, guidance on testing the effects of moderators of planning interventions, recommendations on the social aspects of planning interventions, identification of the preconditions that moderate effectiveness of planning interventions and recommendations for research on how people use plans.

AB - The current article details a position statement and recommendations for future research and practice on planning and implementation intentions in health contexts endorsed by the Synergy Expert Group. The group comprised world-leading researchers in health and social psychology and behavioural medicine who convened to discuss priority issues in planning interventions in health contexts and develop a set of recommendations for future research and practice. The expert group adopted a nominal groups approach and voting system to elicit and structure priority issues in planning interventions and implementation intentions research. Forty-two priority issues identified in initial discussions were further condensed to 18 key issues, including definitions of planning and implementation intentions and 17 priority research areas. Each issue was subjected to voting for consensus among group members and formed the basis of the position statement and recommendations. Specifically, the expert group endorsed statements and recommendations in the following areas: generic definition of planning and specific definition of implementation intentions, recommendations for better testing of mechanisms, guidance on testing the effects of moderators of planning interventions, recommendations on the social aspects of planning interventions, identification of the preconditions that moderate effectiveness of planning interventions and recommendations for research on how people use plans.

KW - cues-to-action

KW - goal striving

KW - if-then plans

KW - implementation intentions

KW - planning

KW - volition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962555249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962555249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 814

EP - 839

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 7

ER -