Impact of Monetary Incentives on Adherence to Referral for Screening Chest X-rays after Syringe Exchange-Based Tuberculin Skin Testing

David C. Perlman, Patricia Friedmann, Leslie Horn, Anne Nugent, Veronika Schoeb, Jeanne Carey, Nadim Salomon, Don Des Jarlais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction. Syringe-exchange programs (SEPs) have proven to be valuable sites to conduct tuberculin skin testing among active injection drug users. Chest x-rays (CXRs) are needed to exclude active tuberculosis prior to initiating treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. Adherence of drug users to referral for off-site chest x-rays has been incomplete. Previous cost modeling demonstrated that a monetary incentive to promote adherence could be justified on the cost basis if it had even a modest effect on adherence. Methods. We compared adherence to referral for chest x-rays among injection drug users undergoing syringe exchange-based tuberculosis screening in New York City before and after the implementation of monetary incentives. Results. From 1995 to 1998, there were 119 IDUs referred for CXRs based on tuberculin skin testing at the SEP. From 1999 to 2001, there were 58 IDUs referred for CXRs with a $25 incentive based on adherence. Adherence to CXR referral within 7 days was 46/58 (79%) among individuals who received the monetary incentive versus 17/119 (14%) prior to the implementation of the monetary incentive (P < .0001; odds ratio [OR] = 23; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.5-57). The median time to obtaining a CXR was significantly shorter among those given the incentive than among those referred without the incentive (2 vs. 11 days, P < .0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of the incentive was highly independently associated with increased adherence (OR = 22.9; 95% CI = 10-52). Conclusions. Monetary incentives are highly effective in increasing adherence to referral for screening CXRs to exclude active tuberculosis after syringe exchange-based tuberculin skin testing. Prior cost modeling demonstrated that monetary incentives could be justified on the cost basis if they had even a modest effect on adherence. The current data demonstrated that monetary incentives are highly effective at increasing adherence in this setting and therefore are justifiable on a cost basis. When health care interventions for drug users require referral off site, monetary incentives may be particularly valuable in promoting adherence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)428-437
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Urban Health
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

Fingerprint

Tuberculin
Syringes
Motivation
Thorax
Referral and Consultation
incentive
X-Rays
Skin
Drug Users
contagious disease
Costs and Cost Analysis
Needle-Exchange Programs
drug
costs
Tuberculosis
confidence
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Latent Tuberculosis
Injections

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Drug users
  • Incentives
  • Tuberculosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Impact of Monetary Incentives on Adherence to Referral for Screening Chest X-rays after Syringe Exchange-Based Tuberculin Skin Testing. / Perlman, David C.; Friedmann, Patricia; Horn, Leslie; Nugent, Anne; Schoeb, Veronika; Carey, Jeanne; Salomon, Nadim; Des Jarlais, Don.

In: Journal of Urban Health, Vol. 80, No. 3, 01.09.2003, p. 428-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perlman, David C. ; Friedmann, Patricia ; Horn, Leslie ; Nugent, Anne ; Schoeb, Veronika ; Carey, Jeanne ; Salomon, Nadim ; Des Jarlais, Don. / Impact of Monetary Incentives on Adherence to Referral for Screening Chest X-rays after Syringe Exchange-Based Tuberculin Skin Testing. In: Journal of Urban Health. 2003 ; Vol. 80, No. 3. pp. 428-437.
@article{8c337ca6e0df41829cee2d10a28c6584,
title = "Impact of Monetary Incentives on Adherence to Referral for Screening Chest X-rays after Syringe Exchange-Based Tuberculin Skin Testing",
abstract = "Introduction. Syringe-exchange programs (SEPs) have proven to be valuable sites to conduct tuberculin skin testing among active injection drug users. Chest x-rays (CXRs) are needed to exclude active tuberculosis prior to initiating treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. Adherence of drug users to referral for off-site chest x-rays has been incomplete. Previous cost modeling demonstrated that a monetary incentive to promote adherence could be justified on the cost basis if it had even a modest effect on adherence. Methods. We compared adherence to referral for chest x-rays among injection drug users undergoing syringe exchange-based tuberculosis screening in New York City before and after the implementation of monetary incentives. Results. From 1995 to 1998, there were 119 IDUs referred for CXRs based on tuberculin skin testing at the SEP. From 1999 to 2001, there were 58 IDUs referred for CXRs with a $25 incentive based on adherence. Adherence to CXR referral within 7 days was 46/58 (79{\%}) among individuals who received the monetary incentive versus 17/119 (14{\%}) prior to the implementation of the monetary incentive (P < .0001; odds ratio [OR] = 23; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 9.5-57). The median time to obtaining a CXR was significantly shorter among those given the incentive than among those referred without the incentive (2 vs. 11 days, P < .0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of the incentive was highly independently associated with increased adherence (OR = 22.9; 95{\%} CI = 10-52). Conclusions. Monetary incentives are highly effective in increasing adherence to referral for screening CXRs to exclude active tuberculosis after syringe exchange-based tuberculin skin testing. Prior cost modeling demonstrated that monetary incentives could be justified on the cost basis if they had even a modest effect on adherence. The current data demonstrated that monetary incentives are highly effective at increasing adherence in this setting and therefore are justifiable on a cost basis. When health care interventions for drug users require referral off site, monetary incentives may be particularly valuable in promoting adherence.",
keywords = "Adherence, Drug users, Incentives, Tuberculosis",
author = "Perlman, {David C.} and Patricia Friedmann and Leslie Horn and Anne Nugent and Veronika Schoeb and Jeanne Carey and Nadim Salomon and {Des Jarlais}, Don",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jurban/jtg044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "428--437",
journal = "Journal of Urban Health",
issn = "1099-3460",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Monetary Incentives on Adherence to Referral for Screening Chest X-rays after Syringe Exchange-Based Tuberculin Skin Testing

AU - Perlman, David C.

AU - Friedmann, Patricia

AU - Horn, Leslie

AU - Nugent, Anne

AU - Schoeb, Veronika

AU - Carey, Jeanne

AU - Salomon, Nadim

AU - Des Jarlais, Don

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Introduction. Syringe-exchange programs (SEPs) have proven to be valuable sites to conduct tuberculin skin testing among active injection drug users. Chest x-rays (CXRs) are needed to exclude active tuberculosis prior to initiating treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. Adherence of drug users to referral for off-site chest x-rays has been incomplete. Previous cost modeling demonstrated that a monetary incentive to promote adherence could be justified on the cost basis if it had even a modest effect on adherence. Methods. We compared adherence to referral for chest x-rays among injection drug users undergoing syringe exchange-based tuberculosis screening in New York City before and after the implementation of monetary incentives. Results. From 1995 to 1998, there were 119 IDUs referred for CXRs based on tuberculin skin testing at the SEP. From 1999 to 2001, there were 58 IDUs referred for CXRs with a $25 incentive based on adherence. Adherence to CXR referral within 7 days was 46/58 (79%) among individuals who received the monetary incentive versus 17/119 (14%) prior to the implementation of the monetary incentive (P < .0001; odds ratio [OR] = 23; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.5-57). The median time to obtaining a CXR was significantly shorter among those given the incentive than among those referred without the incentive (2 vs. 11 days, P < .0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of the incentive was highly independently associated with increased adherence (OR = 22.9; 95% CI = 10-52). Conclusions. Monetary incentives are highly effective in increasing adherence to referral for screening CXRs to exclude active tuberculosis after syringe exchange-based tuberculin skin testing. Prior cost modeling demonstrated that monetary incentives could be justified on the cost basis if they had even a modest effect on adherence. The current data demonstrated that monetary incentives are highly effective at increasing adherence in this setting and therefore are justifiable on a cost basis. When health care interventions for drug users require referral off site, monetary incentives may be particularly valuable in promoting adherence.

AB - Introduction. Syringe-exchange programs (SEPs) have proven to be valuable sites to conduct tuberculin skin testing among active injection drug users. Chest x-rays (CXRs) are needed to exclude active tuberculosis prior to initiating treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. Adherence of drug users to referral for off-site chest x-rays has been incomplete. Previous cost modeling demonstrated that a monetary incentive to promote adherence could be justified on the cost basis if it had even a modest effect on adherence. Methods. We compared adherence to referral for chest x-rays among injection drug users undergoing syringe exchange-based tuberculosis screening in New York City before and after the implementation of monetary incentives. Results. From 1995 to 1998, there were 119 IDUs referred for CXRs based on tuberculin skin testing at the SEP. From 1999 to 2001, there were 58 IDUs referred for CXRs with a $25 incentive based on adherence. Adherence to CXR referral within 7 days was 46/58 (79%) among individuals who received the monetary incentive versus 17/119 (14%) prior to the implementation of the monetary incentive (P < .0001; odds ratio [OR] = 23; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.5-57). The median time to obtaining a CXR was significantly shorter among those given the incentive than among those referred without the incentive (2 vs. 11 days, P < .0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of the incentive was highly independently associated with increased adherence (OR = 22.9; 95% CI = 10-52). Conclusions. Monetary incentives are highly effective in increasing adherence to referral for screening CXRs to exclude active tuberculosis after syringe exchange-based tuberculin skin testing. Prior cost modeling demonstrated that monetary incentives could be justified on the cost basis if they had even a modest effect on adherence. The current data demonstrated that monetary incentives are highly effective at increasing adherence in this setting and therefore are justifiable on a cost basis. When health care interventions for drug users require referral off site, monetary incentives may be particularly valuable in promoting adherence.

KW - Adherence

KW - Drug users

KW - Incentives

KW - Tuberculosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142244527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142244527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jurban/jtg044

DO - 10.1093/jurban/jtg044

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 428

EP - 437

JO - Journal of Urban Health

JF - Journal of Urban Health

SN - 1099-3460

IS - 3

ER -