Image theory, social identity, and social dominance

Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images

Michele G. Alexander, Shana Levin, Pj Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present study provides an empirical test of international relations image theory and extends the theory by emphasizing that individuals ' social identity and social dominance motives contribute to such images. One hundred forty-five Lebanese participants completed a survey that assessed their perceptions of U.S.-Lebanese relations, the images they have of the United States, their social identities, and their social dominance orientations. Participants were more likely to hold the barbarian image of the United States than the enemy, imperialist, or ally images. Participants also tended to perceive the United States as having relatively superior power, inferior cultural status, and goals that are incompatible with those of Lebanon. Consistent with image theory predictions, this constellation of structural perceptions was associated with stronger endorsement of the barbarian image. Further-more, participants were more likely to endorse the barbarian image of the United States the more they identified with Arabs and Palestinians, the less they identified with Christians and the Western world, and the lower their social dominance orientation. Results highlight the importance of considering both structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images and demonstrate the need for scholars to move beyond the enemy image of nations when describing international relations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-45
Number of pages19
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Social Dominance
Social Identification
Internationality
Lebanon
Western World
international relations
image of the enemy
Social Identity Theory
Western world
Palestinian
allies
Arab

Keywords

  • International Images
  • Social Dominance
  • Social Identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Image theory, social identity, and social dominance : Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. / Alexander, Michele G.; Levin, Shana; Henry, Pj.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 27-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3320aed93f82496ab6ea6e551d45a794,
title = "Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images",
abstract = "The present study provides an empirical test of international relations image theory and extends the theory by emphasizing that individuals ' social identity and social dominance motives contribute to such images. One hundred forty-five Lebanese participants completed a survey that assessed their perceptions of U.S.-Lebanese relations, the images they have of the United States, their social identities, and their social dominance orientations. Participants were more likely to hold the barbarian image of the United States than the enemy, imperialist, or ally images. Participants also tended to perceive the United States as having relatively superior power, inferior cultural status, and goals that are incompatible with those of Lebanon. Consistent with image theory predictions, this constellation of structural perceptions was associated with stronger endorsement of the barbarian image. Further-more, participants were more likely to endorse the barbarian image of the United States the more they identified with Arabs and Palestinians, the less they identified with Christians and the Western world, and the lower their social dominance orientation. Results highlight the importance of considering both structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images and demonstrate the need for scholars to move beyond the enemy image of nations when describing international relations.",
keywords = "International Images, Social Dominance, Social Identity",
author = "Alexander, {Michele G.} and Shana Levin and Pj Henry",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "27--45",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Image theory, social identity, and social dominance

T2 - Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images

AU - Alexander, Michele G.

AU - Levin, Shana

AU - Henry, Pj

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The present study provides an empirical test of international relations image theory and extends the theory by emphasizing that individuals ' social identity and social dominance motives contribute to such images. One hundred forty-five Lebanese participants completed a survey that assessed their perceptions of U.S.-Lebanese relations, the images they have of the United States, their social identities, and their social dominance orientations. Participants were more likely to hold the barbarian image of the United States than the enemy, imperialist, or ally images. Participants also tended to perceive the United States as having relatively superior power, inferior cultural status, and goals that are incompatible with those of Lebanon. Consistent with image theory predictions, this constellation of structural perceptions was associated with stronger endorsement of the barbarian image. Further-more, participants were more likely to endorse the barbarian image of the United States the more they identified with Arabs and Palestinians, the less they identified with Christians and the Western world, and the lower their social dominance orientation. Results highlight the importance of considering both structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images and demonstrate the need for scholars to move beyond the enemy image of nations when describing international relations.

AB - The present study provides an empirical test of international relations image theory and extends the theory by emphasizing that individuals ' social identity and social dominance motives contribute to such images. One hundred forty-five Lebanese participants completed a survey that assessed their perceptions of U.S.-Lebanese relations, the images they have of the United States, their social identities, and their social dominance orientations. Participants were more likely to hold the barbarian image of the United States than the enemy, imperialist, or ally images. Participants also tended to perceive the United States as having relatively superior power, inferior cultural status, and goals that are incompatible with those of Lebanon. Consistent with image theory predictions, this constellation of structural perceptions was associated with stronger endorsement of the barbarian image. Further-more, participants were more likely to endorse the barbarian image of the United States the more they identified with Arabs and Palestinians, the less they identified with Christians and the Western world, and the lower their social dominance orientation. Results highlight the importance of considering both structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images and demonstrate the need for scholars to move beyond the enemy image of nations when describing international relations.

KW - International Images

KW - Social Dominance

KW - Social Identity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444301321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444301321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 27

EP - 45

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 1

ER -