Ideological Differences in Anchoring and Adjustment During Social Inferences

Chadly Stern, Tessa West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that conservatives perceive greater similarity to political ingroup members than do liberals. In two studies, we draw from a framework of “anchoring and adjustment” to understand why liberals and conservatives differ in their perceptions of ingroup similarity. Results indicate that when participants made judgments under time pressure, liberals and conservatives did not differ in assuming ingroup similarity. However, when participants were given sufficient time to make judgments, liberals assumed less similarity than conservatives did, suggesting that liberals adjusted their judgments to a greater extent than conservatives did (Studies 1 and 2). In examining an underlying motivational process, we found that when conservatives’ desire to affiliate with others was attenuated, they adjusted their initial judgments of ingroup similarity to a similar extent as liberals did (Study 2). We discuss implications for research on ideology and social judgment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1466-1479
Number of pages14
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume42
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Research

Keywords

  • anchoring and adjustment
  • ideology
  • relational motives
  • social perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Ideological Differences in Anchoring and Adjustment During Social Inferences. / Stern, Chadly; West, Tessa.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 1466-1479.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a360df5c334422ead97e9453a5a52b6,
title = "Ideological Differences in Anchoring and Adjustment During Social Inferences",
abstract = "Recent research has demonstrated that conservatives perceive greater similarity to political ingroup members than do liberals. In two studies, we draw from a framework of “anchoring and adjustment” to understand why liberals and conservatives differ in their perceptions of ingroup similarity. Results indicate that when participants made judgments under time pressure, liberals and conservatives did not differ in assuming ingroup similarity. However, when participants were given sufficient time to make judgments, liberals assumed less similarity than conservatives did, suggesting that liberals adjusted their judgments to a greater extent than conservatives did (Studies 1 and 2). In examining an underlying motivational process, we found that when conservatives’ desire to affiliate with others was attenuated, they adjusted their initial judgments of ingroup similarity to a similar extent as liberals did (Study 2). We discuss implications for research on ideology and social judgment.",
keywords = "anchoring and adjustment, ideology, relational motives, social perception",
author = "Chadly Stern and Tessa West",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167216664058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1466--1479",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ideological Differences in Anchoring and Adjustment During Social Inferences

AU - Stern, Chadly

AU - West, Tessa

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Recent research has demonstrated that conservatives perceive greater similarity to political ingroup members than do liberals. In two studies, we draw from a framework of “anchoring and adjustment” to understand why liberals and conservatives differ in their perceptions of ingroup similarity. Results indicate that when participants made judgments under time pressure, liberals and conservatives did not differ in assuming ingroup similarity. However, when participants were given sufficient time to make judgments, liberals assumed less similarity than conservatives did, suggesting that liberals adjusted their judgments to a greater extent than conservatives did (Studies 1 and 2). In examining an underlying motivational process, we found that when conservatives’ desire to affiliate with others was attenuated, they adjusted their initial judgments of ingroup similarity to a similar extent as liberals did (Study 2). We discuss implications for research on ideology and social judgment.

AB - Recent research has demonstrated that conservatives perceive greater similarity to political ingroup members than do liberals. In two studies, we draw from a framework of “anchoring and adjustment” to understand why liberals and conservatives differ in their perceptions of ingroup similarity. Results indicate that when participants made judgments under time pressure, liberals and conservatives did not differ in assuming ingroup similarity. However, when participants were given sufficient time to make judgments, liberals assumed less similarity than conservatives did, suggesting that liberals adjusted their judgments to a greater extent than conservatives did (Studies 1 and 2). In examining an underlying motivational process, we found that when conservatives’ desire to affiliate with others was attenuated, they adjusted their initial judgments of ingroup similarity to a similar extent as liberals did (Study 2). We discuss implications for research on ideology and social judgment.

KW - anchoring and adjustment

KW - ideology

KW - relational motives

KW - social perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991687639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991687639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167216664058

DO - 10.1177/0146167216664058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991687639

VL - 42

SP - 1466

EP - 1479

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 11

ER -