Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Implications of results from recall and recognition questions

Ralph Katz, Germain Jean-Charles, B. Lee Green, Nancy R. Kressin, Cristina Claudio, Minqi Wang, Stefanie L. Russell, Jason Outlaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. This analysis assessed whether Blacks, Whites and Puerto-Rican (PR) Hispanics differed in their ability to identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (TSS) via open-ended questions following lead-in recognition and recall questions. Methods. The Tuskegee Legacy Project (TLP) Questionnaire was administered via a Random-Digit Dial (RDD) telephone survey to a stratified random sample of Black, White and PR Hispanic adults in three U.S. cities. Results. The TLP Questionnaire was administered to 1,162 adults (356 African-Americans, 313 PR Hispanics, and 493 non-Hispanic Whites) in San Juan, PR, Baltimore, MD and New York City, NY. Recall question data revealed: 1) that 89% or more of Blacks, Whites, and PR Hispanics were not able to name or definitely identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study by giving study attributes; and, 2) that Blacks were the most likely to provide an open-ended answer that identified the Tuskegee Syphilis Study as compared to Whites and PR Hispanics (11.5% vs 6.3% vs 2.9%, respectively) (p 0.002). Even when probed by a recognition question, only a minority of each racial/ethnic group (37.1%, 26.9%, and 8.6%, for Blacks, Whites and PR Hispanics, respectively) was able to clearly identify the TSS (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The two major implications of these findings for health disparity researchers are 1) that it is unlikely that detailed knowledge of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has any current widespread influence on the willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research, and 2) that caution should be applied before assuming that what community leaders 'know and are aware of' is equally 'well known' within their community constituencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number468
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Syphilis
Hispanic Americans
Baltimore
Ethnic Groups
Telephone
African Americans
Names
Biomedical Research
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study : Implications of results from recall and recognition questions. / Katz, Ralph; Jean-Charles, Germain; Green, B. Lee; Kressin, Nancy R.; Claudio, Cristina; Wang, Minqi; Russell, Stefanie L.; Outlaw, Jason.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 9, 468, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Katz, R, Jean-Charles, G, Green, BL, Kressin, NR, Claudio, C, Wang, M, Russell, SL & Outlaw, J 2009, 'Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Implications of results from recall and recognition questions', BMC Public Health, vol. 9, 468. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-468
Katz, Ralph ; Jean-Charles, Germain ; Green, B. Lee ; Kressin, Nancy R. ; Claudio, Cristina ; Wang, Minqi ; Russell, Stefanie L. ; Outlaw, Jason. / Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study : Implications of results from recall and recognition questions. In: BMC Public Health. 2009 ; Vol. 9.
@article{29b39d2a8a5146339e5508958b238c6f,
title = "Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Implications of results from recall and recognition questions",
abstract = "Background. This analysis assessed whether Blacks, Whites and Puerto-Rican (PR) Hispanics differed in their ability to identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (TSS) via open-ended questions following lead-in recognition and recall questions. Methods. The Tuskegee Legacy Project (TLP) Questionnaire was administered via a Random-Digit Dial (RDD) telephone survey to a stratified random sample of Black, White and PR Hispanic adults in three U.S. cities. Results. The TLP Questionnaire was administered to 1,162 adults (356 African-Americans, 313 PR Hispanics, and 493 non-Hispanic Whites) in San Juan, PR, Baltimore, MD and New York City, NY. Recall question data revealed: 1) that 89{\%} or more of Blacks, Whites, and PR Hispanics were not able to name or definitely identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study by giving study attributes; and, 2) that Blacks were the most likely to provide an open-ended answer that identified the Tuskegee Syphilis Study as compared to Whites and PR Hispanics (11.5{\%} vs 6.3{\%} vs 2.9{\%}, respectively) (p 0.002). Even when probed by a recognition question, only a minority of each racial/ethnic group (37.1{\%}, 26.9{\%}, and 8.6{\%}, for Blacks, Whites and PR Hispanics, respectively) was able to clearly identify the TSS (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The two major implications of these findings for health disparity researchers are 1) that it is unlikely that detailed knowledge of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has any current widespread influence on the willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research, and 2) that caution should be applied before assuming that what community leaders 'know and are aware of' is equally 'well known' within their community constituencies.",
author = "Ralph Katz and Germain Jean-Charles and Green, {B. Lee} and Kressin, {Nancy R.} and Cristina Claudio and Minqi Wang and Russell, {Stefanie L.} and Jason Outlaw",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-9-468",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study

T2 - Implications of results from recall and recognition questions

AU - Katz, Ralph

AU - Jean-Charles, Germain

AU - Green, B. Lee

AU - Kressin, Nancy R.

AU - Claudio, Cristina

AU - Wang, Minqi

AU - Russell, Stefanie L.

AU - Outlaw, Jason

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background. This analysis assessed whether Blacks, Whites and Puerto-Rican (PR) Hispanics differed in their ability to identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (TSS) via open-ended questions following lead-in recognition and recall questions. Methods. The Tuskegee Legacy Project (TLP) Questionnaire was administered via a Random-Digit Dial (RDD) telephone survey to a stratified random sample of Black, White and PR Hispanic adults in three U.S. cities. Results. The TLP Questionnaire was administered to 1,162 adults (356 African-Americans, 313 PR Hispanics, and 493 non-Hispanic Whites) in San Juan, PR, Baltimore, MD and New York City, NY. Recall question data revealed: 1) that 89% or more of Blacks, Whites, and PR Hispanics were not able to name or definitely identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study by giving study attributes; and, 2) that Blacks were the most likely to provide an open-ended answer that identified the Tuskegee Syphilis Study as compared to Whites and PR Hispanics (11.5% vs 6.3% vs 2.9%, respectively) (p 0.002). Even when probed by a recognition question, only a minority of each racial/ethnic group (37.1%, 26.9%, and 8.6%, for Blacks, Whites and PR Hispanics, respectively) was able to clearly identify the TSS (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The two major implications of these findings for health disparity researchers are 1) that it is unlikely that detailed knowledge of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has any current widespread influence on the willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research, and 2) that caution should be applied before assuming that what community leaders 'know and are aware of' is equally 'well known' within their community constituencies.

AB - Background. This analysis assessed whether Blacks, Whites and Puerto-Rican (PR) Hispanics differed in their ability to identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (TSS) via open-ended questions following lead-in recognition and recall questions. Methods. The Tuskegee Legacy Project (TLP) Questionnaire was administered via a Random-Digit Dial (RDD) telephone survey to a stratified random sample of Black, White and PR Hispanic adults in three U.S. cities. Results. The TLP Questionnaire was administered to 1,162 adults (356 African-Americans, 313 PR Hispanics, and 493 non-Hispanic Whites) in San Juan, PR, Baltimore, MD and New York City, NY. Recall question data revealed: 1) that 89% or more of Blacks, Whites, and PR Hispanics were not able to name or definitely identify the Tuskegee Syphilis Study by giving study attributes; and, 2) that Blacks were the most likely to provide an open-ended answer that identified the Tuskegee Syphilis Study as compared to Whites and PR Hispanics (11.5% vs 6.3% vs 2.9%, respectively) (p 0.002). Even when probed by a recognition question, only a minority of each racial/ethnic group (37.1%, 26.9%, and 8.6%, for Blacks, Whites and PR Hispanics, respectively) was able to clearly identify the TSS (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The two major implications of these findings for health disparity researchers are 1) that it is unlikely that detailed knowledge of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has any current widespread influence on the willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research, and 2) that caution should be applied before assuming that what community leaders 'know and are aware of' is equally 'well known' within their community constituencies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75149132501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75149132501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-9-468

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-9-468

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

M1 - 468

ER -