Ideas in action

The politics of Prussian child labor reform, 1817-1839

Elisabeth Anderson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article explains the political origins of an 1839 law regulating the factory employment of children in Prussia. The article has two aims. First, it seeks to explain why Prussia adopted the particular law that it did. Existing historical explanations of this particular policy change are not correct, largely because they fail to take into account the actual motivations and intentions of key reformers. Second, the article contributes to theories of the role of ideas in public policymaking. Ideas interact with institutional and political factors to serve as motivators and as resources for policy change. As motivators, they drive political action and shape the content of policy programs; as resources, they enable political actors to recruit supporters and forge alliances. I offer a theory of the relationship between ideas, motivation, and political action, and I develop a methodological framework for assessing the reliability of political actors' expressed motivations. Further, I explain how political actors use ideas as resources by deploying three specific ideational strategies: framing, borrowing, and citing. By tracing how different understandings of the child labor problem motivated and were embodied in two competing child labor policy proposals, I show how the ideas underlying reform had significant consequences for policy outcomes.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)81-119
    Number of pages39
    JournalTheory and Society
    Volume42
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

    Fingerprint

    child labor
    political actor
    Prussia
    political action
    reform
    politics
    resources
    labor policy
    Law
    institutional factors
    political factors
    factory
    Child Labor
    Resources

    Keywords

    • Framing
    • Ideas
    • Ideational strategy
    • Institutions
    • Motivation
    • Policy change
    • Political action

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • History
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Ideas in action : The politics of Prussian child labor reform, 1817-1839. / Anderson, Elisabeth.

    In: Theory and Society, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 81-119.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Anderson, Elisabeth. / Ideas in action : The politics of Prussian child labor reform, 1817-1839. In: Theory and Society. 2013 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 81-119.
    @article{bc9781875dc44abb9786921d629dae1d,
    title = "Ideas in action: The politics of Prussian child labor reform, 1817-1839",
    abstract = "This article explains the political origins of an 1839 law regulating the factory employment of children in Prussia. The article has two aims. First, it seeks to explain why Prussia adopted the particular law that it did. Existing historical explanations of this particular policy change are not correct, largely because they fail to take into account the actual motivations and intentions of key reformers. Second, the article contributes to theories of the role of ideas in public policymaking. Ideas interact with institutional and political factors to serve as motivators and as resources for policy change. As motivators, they drive political action and shape the content of policy programs; as resources, they enable political actors to recruit supporters and forge alliances. I offer a theory of the relationship between ideas, motivation, and political action, and I develop a methodological framework for assessing the reliability of political actors' expressed motivations. Further, I explain how political actors use ideas as resources by deploying three specific ideational strategies: framing, borrowing, and citing. By tracing how different understandings of the child labor problem motivated and were embodied in two competing child labor policy proposals, I show how the ideas underlying reform had significant consequences for policy outcomes.",
    keywords = "Framing, Ideas, Ideational strategy, Institutions, Motivation, Policy change, Political action",
    author = "Elisabeth Anderson",
    year = "2013",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s11186-012-9186-4",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "81--119",
    journal = "Theory and Society",
    issn = "0304-2421",
    publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ideas in action

    T2 - The politics of Prussian child labor reform, 1817-1839

    AU - Anderson, Elisabeth

    PY - 2013/1/1

    Y1 - 2013/1/1

    N2 - This article explains the political origins of an 1839 law regulating the factory employment of children in Prussia. The article has two aims. First, it seeks to explain why Prussia adopted the particular law that it did. Existing historical explanations of this particular policy change are not correct, largely because they fail to take into account the actual motivations and intentions of key reformers. Second, the article contributes to theories of the role of ideas in public policymaking. Ideas interact with institutional and political factors to serve as motivators and as resources for policy change. As motivators, they drive political action and shape the content of policy programs; as resources, they enable political actors to recruit supporters and forge alliances. I offer a theory of the relationship between ideas, motivation, and political action, and I develop a methodological framework for assessing the reliability of political actors' expressed motivations. Further, I explain how political actors use ideas as resources by deploying three specific ideational strategies: framing, borrowing, and citing. By tracing how different understandings of the child labor problem motivated and were embodied in two competing child labor policy proposals, I show how the ideas underlying reform had significant consequences for policy outcomes.

    AB - This article explains the political origins of an 1839 law regulating the factory employment of children in Prussia. The article has two aims. First, it seeks to explain why Prussia adopted the particular law that it did. Existing historical explanations of this particular policy change are not correct, largely because they fail to take into account the actual motivations and intentions of key reformers. Second, the article contributes to theories of the role of ideas in public policymaking. Ideas interact with institutional and political factors to serve as motivators and as resources for policy change. As motivators, they drive political action and shape the content of policy programs; as resources, they enable political actors to recruit supporters and forge alliances. I offer a theory of the relationship between ideas, motivation, and political action, and I develop a methodological framework for assessing the reliability of political actors' expressed motivations. Further, I explain how political actors use ideas as resources by deploying three specific ideational strategies: framing, borrowing, and citing. By tracing how different understandings of the child labor problem motivated and were embodied in two competing child labor policy proposals, I show how the ideas underlying reform had significant consequences for policy outcomes.

    KW - Framing

    KW - Ideas

    KW - Ideational strategy

    KW - Institutions

    KW - Motivation

    KW - Policy change

    KW - Political action

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874115515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874115515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11186-012-9186-4

    DO - 10.1007/s11186-012-9186-4

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 81

    EP - 119

    JO - Theory and Society

    JF - Theory and Society

    SN - 0304-2421

    IS - 1

    ER -