Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence

Rachel N. Denison, William T. Adler, Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro, Wei Ji Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Perceptual decisions are better when they take uncertainty into account. Uncertainty arises not only from the properties of sensory input but also from cognitive sources, such as different levels of attention. However, it is unknown whether humans appropriately adjust for such cognitive sources of uncertainty during perceptual decision-making. Here we show that, in a task in which uncertainty is relevant for performance, human categorization and confidence decisions take into account uncertainty related to attention. We manipulated uncertainty in an orientation categorization task from trial to trial using only an attentional cue. The categorization task was designed to disambiguate decision rules that did or did not depend on attention. Using formal model comparison to evaluate decision behavior, we found that category and confidence decision boundaries shifted as a function of attention in an approximately Bayesian fashion. This means that the observer's attentional state on each trial contributed probabilistically to the decision computation. This responsiveness of an observer's decisions to attention-dependent uncertainty should improve perceptual decisions in natural vision, in which attention is unevenly distributed across a scene.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11090-11095
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume115
Issue number43
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2018

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Cues
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Bayesian
  • Confidence
  • Criterion
  • Perceptual decision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence. / Denison, Rachel N.; Adler, William T.; Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa; Ma, Wei Ji.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 115, No. 43, 23.10.2018, p. 11090-11095.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{777dc77b1dde41ccb3655d3f49b0e8ea,
title = "Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence",
abstract = "Perceptual decisions are better when they take uncertainty into account. Uncertainty arises not only from the properties of sensory input but also from cognitive sources, such as different levels of attention. However, it is unknown whether humans appropriately adjust for such cognitive sources of uncertainty during perceptual decision-making. Here we show that, in a task in which uncertainty is relevant for performance, human categorization and confidence decisions take into account uncertainty related to attention. We manipulated uncertainty in an orientation categorization task from trial to trial using only an attentional cue. The categorization task was designed to disambiguate decision rules that did or did not depend on attention. Using formal model comparison to evaluate decision behavior, we found that category and confidence decision boundaries shifted as a function of attention in an approximately Bayesian fashion. This means that the observer's attentional state on each trial contributed probabilistically to the decision computation. This responsiveness of an observer's decisions to attention-dependent uncertainty should improve perceptual decisions in natural vision, in which attention is unevenly distributed across a scene.",
keywords = "Attention, Bayesian, Confidence, Criterion, Perceptual decision",
author = "Denison, {Rachel N.} and Adler, {William T.} and Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro and Ma, {Wei Ji}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1717720115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "11090--11095",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "43",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence

AU - Denison, Rachel N.

AU - Adler, William T.

AU - Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa

AU - Ma, Wei Ji

PY - 2018/10/23

Y1 - 2018/10/23

N2 - Perceptual decisions are better when they take uncertainty into account. Uncertainty arises not only from the properties of sensory input but also from cognitive sources, such as different levels of attention. However, it is unknown whether humans appropriately adjust for such cognitive sources of uncertainty during perceptual decision-making. Here we show that, in a task in which uncertainty is relevant for performance, human categorization and confidence decisions take into account uncertainty related to attention. We manipulated uncertainty in an orientation categorization task from trial to trial using only an attentional cue. The categorization task was designed to disambiguate decision rules that did or did not depend on attention. Using formal model comparison to evaluate decision behavior, we found that category and confidence decision boundaries shifted as a function of attention in an approximately Bayesian fashion. This means that the observer's attentional state on each trial contributed probabilistically to the decision computation. This responsiveness of an observer's decisions to attention-dependent uncertainty should improve perceptual decisions in natural vision, in which attention is unevenly distributed across a scene.

AB - Perceptual decisions are better when they take uncertainty into account. Uncertainty arises not only from the properties of sensory input but also from cognitive sources, such as different levels of attention. However, it is unknown whether humans appropriately adjust for such cognitive sources of uncertainty during perceptual decision-making. Here we show that, in a task in which uncertainty is relevant for performance, human categorization and confidence decisions take into account uncertainty related to attention. We manipulated uncertainty in an orientation categorization task from trial to trial using only an attentional cue. The categorization task was designed to disambiguate decision rules that did or did not depend on attention. Using formal model comparison to evaluate decision behavior, we found that category and confidence decision boundaries shifted as a function of attention in an approximately Bayesian fashion. This means that the observer's attentional state on each trial contributed probabilistically to the decision computation. This responsiveness of an observer's decisions to attention-dependent uncertainty should improve perceptual decisions in natural vision, in which attention is unevenly distributed across a scene.

KW - Attention

KW - Bayesian

KW - Confidence

KW - Criterion

KW - Perceptual decision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055608792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055608792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1717720115

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1717720115

M3 - Article

C2 - 30297430

AN - SCOPUS:85055608792

VL - 115

SP - 11090

EP - 11095

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 43

ER -