Human contrast discrimination and the threshold of cortical neurons.

H. B. Barlow, T. P. Kaushal, Michael Hawken, A. J. Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The human contrast-discrimination function has a curious shape: In addition to rising for increasing contrasts, both positive and negative, it also rises for very low contrasts on either side of zero. It is shown that this rise near zero contrast is not much affected by procedures that increase or decrease the subject's knowledge of the stimulus; this counts against uncertainty as the immediate cause of the elevation near zero contrast. The alternative explanation in terms of a genuine response threshold is shown to be promising when measurements of human contrast discrimination are compared with values calculated from records of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex. The comparison also suggests that the dynamic range of single neurons is lower than that shown psychophysically. It is suggested that having a cortical threshold may be the visual system's way of preventing false positives when there is much stimulus uncertainty. This threshold may also help to explain why quantum efficiencies calculated from detection thresholds are so poor compared with those estimated from the visual system's susceptibility to added noise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2366-2371
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science
Volume4
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1987

Fingerprint

Neurons
Uncertainty
Visual Cortex
Quantum efficiency
Haplorhini
Noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Human contrast discrimination and the threshold of cortical neurons. / Barlow, H. B.; Kaushal, T. P.; Hawken, Michael; Parker, A. J.

In: Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science, Vol. 4, No. 12, 12.1987, p. 2366-2371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5df5025043e47d399078d0c5f860008,
title = "Human contrast discrimination and the threshold of cortical neurons.",
abstract = "The human contrast-discrimination function has a curious shape: In addition to rising for increasing contrasts, both positive and negative, it also rises for very low contrasts on either side of zero. It is shown that this rise near zero contrast is not much affected by procedures that increase or decrease the subject's knowledge of the stimulus; this counts against uncertainty as the immediate cause of the elevation near zero contrast. The alternative explanation in terms of a genuine response threshold is shown to be promising when measurements of human contrast discrimination are compared with values calculated from records of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex. The comparison also suggests that the dynamic range of single neurons is lower than that shown psychophysically. It is suggested that having a cortical threshold may be the visual system's way of preventing false positives when there is much stimulus uncertainty. This threshold may also help to explain why quantum efficiencies calculated from detection thresholds are so poor compared with those estimated from the visual system's susceptibility to added noise.",
author = "Barlow, {H. B.} and Kaushal, {T. P.} and Michael Hawken and Parker, {A. J.}",
year = "1987",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "2366--2371",
journal = "Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision",
issn = "0740-3232",
publisher = "The Optical Society",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human contrast discrimination and the threshold of cortical neurons.

AU - Barlow, H. B.

AU - Kaushal, T. P.

AU - Hawken, Michael

AU - Parker, A. J.

PY - 1987/12

Y1 - 1987/12

N2 - The human contrast-discrimination function has a curious shape: In addition to rising for increasing contrasts, both positive and negative, it also rises for very low contrasts on either side of zero. It is shown that this rise near zero contrast is not much affected by procedures that increase or decrease the subject's knowledge of the stimulus; this counts against uncertainty as the immediate cause of the elevation near zero contrast. The alternative explanation in terms of a genuine response threshold is shown to be promising when measurements of human contrast discrimination are compared with values calculated from records of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex. The comparison also suggests that the dynamic range of single neurons is lower than that shown psychophysically. It is suggested that having a cortical threshold may be the visual system's way of preventing false positives when there is much stimulus uncertainty. This threshold may also help to explain why quantum efficiencies calculated from detection thresholds are so poor compared with those estimated from the visual system's susceptibility to added noise.

AB - The human contrast-discrimination function has a curious shape: In addition to rising for increasing contrasts, both positive and negative, it also rises for very low contrasts on either side of zero. It is shown that this rise near zero contrast is not much affected by procedures that increase or decrease the subject's knowledge of the stimulus; this counts against uncertainty as the immediate cause of the elevation near zero contrast. The alternative explanation in terms of a genuine response threshold is shown to be promising when measurements of human contrast discrimination are compared with values calculated from records of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex. The comparison also suggests that the dynamic range of single neurons is lower than that shown psychophysically. It is suggested that having a cortical threshold may be the visual system's way of preventing false positives when there is much stimulus uncertainty. This threshold may also help to explain why quantum efficiencies calculated from detection thresholds are so poor compared with those estimated from the visual system's susceptibility to added noise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023504562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023504562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3430223

AN - SCOPUS:0023504562

VL - 4

SP - 2366

EP - 2371

JO - Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

JF - Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

SN - 0740-3232

IS - 12

ER -