How Uncertainty about War Outcomes Affects War Onset

Muhammet Bas, Robert J. Schub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In canonical accounts of war, conflict outcomes are inherently uncertain. Contesting literatures posit that this uncertainty, arising from stochastic elements of the war-fighting process, may induce conflict due to greater risks of miscalculation or foster peace by breeding caution. We theorize that states, on average, exhibit prudence when confronting greater uncertainty. Despite its conceptual importance, extant proxies for uncertainty at various levels of analysis—such as polarity, balance of power, system concentration, and dyadic relative capabilities—are imprecise and theoretically inappropriate indicators. To overcome this shortcoming, we theorize the conditions that elevate the magnitude of uncertainty over conflict outcomes and introduce a novel measure that captures this uncertainty within any k-state system. Through extensive empirical analysis, we confirm uncertainty’s pacifying effect and show how this effect operates at different levels of analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1099-1128
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume60
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

uncertainty
balance of power
peace
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • capabilities
  • conflict
  • dyadic conflict
  • militarized interstate disputes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

How Uncertainty about War Outcomes Affects War Onset. / Bas, Muhammet; Schub, Robert J.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 60, No. 6, 01.09.2016, p. 1099-1128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bas, Muhammet ; Schub, Robert J. / How Uncertainty about War Outcomes Affects War Onset. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2016 ; Vol. 60, No. 6. pp. 1099-1128.
@article{b3b4d8496f0a43de94702e59d5289062,
title = "How Uncertainty about War Outcomes Affects War Onset",
abstract = "In canonical accounts of war, conflict outcomes are inherently uncertain. Contesting literatures posit that this uncertainty, arising from stochastic elements of the war-fighting process, may induce conflict due to greater risks of miscalculation or foster peace by breeding caution. We theorize that states, on average, exhibit prudence when confronting greater uncertainty. Despite its conceptual importance, extant proxies for uncertainty at various levels of analysis—such as polarity, balance of power, system concentration, and dyadic relative capabilities—are imprecise and theoretically inappropriate indicators. To overcome this shortcoming, we theorize the conditions that elevate the magnitude of uncertainty over conflict outcomes and introduce a novel measure that captures this uncertainty within any k-state system. Through extensive empirical analysis, we confirm uncertainty’s pacifying effect and show how this effect operates at different levels of analysis.",
keywords = "capabilities, conflict, dyadic conflict, militarized interstate disputes",
author = "Muhammet Bas and Schub, {Robert J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002714553110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "1099--1128",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Uncertainty about War Outcomes Affects War Onset

AU - Bas, Muhammet

AU - Schub, Robert J.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - In canonical accounts of war, conflict outcomes are inherently uncertain. Contesting literatures posit that this uncertainty, arising from stochastic elements of the war-fighting process, may induce conflict due to greater risks of miscalculation or foster peace by breeding caution. We theorize that states, on average, exhibit prudence when confronting greater uncertainty. Despite its conceptual importance, extant proxies for uncertainty at various levels of analysis—such as polarity, balance of power, system concentration, and dyadic relative capabilities—are imprecise and theoretically inappropriate indicators. To overcome this shortcoming, we theorize the conditions that elevate the magnitude of uncertainty over conflict outcomes and introduce a novel measure that captures this uncertainty within any k-state system. Through extensive empirical analysis, we confirm uncertainty’s pacifying effect and show how this effect operates at different levels of analysis.

AB - In canonical accounts of war, conflict outcomes are inherently uncertain. Contesting literatures posit that this uncertainty, arising from stochastic elements of the war-fighting process, may induce conflict due to greater risks of miscalculation or foster peace by breeding caution. We theorize that states, on average, exhibit prudence when confronting greater uncertainty. Despite its conceptual importance, extant proxies for uncertainty at various levels of analysis—such as polarity, balance of power, system concentration, and dyadic relative capabilities—are imprecise and theoretically inappropriate indicators. To overcome this shortcoming, we theorize the conditions that elevate the magnitude of uncertainty over conflict outcomes and introduce a novel measure that captures this uncertainty within any k-state system. Through extensive empirical analysis, we confirm uncertainty’s pacifying effect and show how this effect operates at different levels of analysis.

KW - capabilities

KW - conflict

KW - dyadic conflict

KW - militarized interstate disputes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981736078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981736078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002714553110

DO - 10.1177/0022002714553110

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84981736078

VL - 60

SP - 1099

EP - 1128

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 6

ER -