HOW TO BE SOPHISTICATED, LIE, CHEAT, BLUFF AND WIN AT POLITICS

Michael Laver

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Abstract. This paper presents an informal argument about the relationship between strategic interaction and‘economic’theories of political processes. It is concerned with interactions between small groups of rational actors, in which each knows the preferences of the others and is attempting to get the better of the others. In these circumstances, the outcome is usually determined by the strategic interaction involved and is often, therefore, rather unstable. Since formal models in themselves do not help us very much to interpret the processes involved, the bulk of the paper is concerned with an analysis of various aspects of strategic interaction. These include being sophisticated, lying, cheating and bluffing.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)462-473
    Number of pages12
    JournalPolitical Studies
    Volume26
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1978

    Fingerprint

    politics
    interaction
    small group

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    HOW TO BE SOPHISTICATED, LIE, CHEAT, BLUFF AND WIN AT POLITICS. / Laver, Michael.

    In: Political Studies, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1978, p. 462-473.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Laver, Michael. / HOW TO BE SOPHISTICATED, LIE, CHEAT, BLUFF AND WIN AT POLITICS. In: Political Studies. 1978 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 462-473.
    @article{e9105a86f1a842c585129cdf24f1e500,
    title = "HOW TO BE SOPHISTICATED, LIE, CHEAT, BLUFF AND WIN AT POLITICS",
    abstract = "Abstract. This paper presents an informal argument about the relationship between strategic interaction and‘economic’theories of political processes. It is concerned with interactions between small groups of rational actors, in which each knows the preferences of the others and is attempting to get the better of the others. In these circumstances, the outcome is usually determined by the strategic interaction involved and is often, therefore, rather unstable. Since formal models in themselves do not help us very much to interpret the processes involved, the bulk of the paper is concerned with an analysis of various aspects of strategic interaction. These include being sophisticated, lying, cheating and bluffing.",
    author = "Michael Laver",
    year = "1978",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.1978.tb01311.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "462--473",
    journal = "Political Studies",
    issn = "0032-3217",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - HOW TO BE SOPHISTICATED, LIE, CHEAT, BLUFF AND WIN AT POLITICS

    AU - Laver, Michael

    PY - 1978

    Y1 - 1978

    N2 - Abstract. This paper presents an informal argument about the relationship between strategic interaction and‘economic’theories of political processes. It is concerned with interactions between small groups of rational actors, in which each knows the preferences of the others and is attempting to get the better of the others. In these circumstances, the outcome is usually determined by the strategic interaction involved and is often, therefore, rather unstable. Since formal models in themselves do not help us very much to interpret the processes involved, the bulk of the paper is concerned with an analysis of various aspects of strategic interaction. These include being sophisticated, lying, cheating and bluffing.

    AB - Abstract. This paper presents an informal argument about the relationship between strategic interaction and‘economic’theories of political processes. It is concerned with interactions between small groups of rational actors, in which each knows the preferences of the others and is attempting to get the better of the others. In these circumstances, the outcome is usually determined by the strategic interaction involved and is often, therefore, rather unstable. Since formal models in themselves do not help us very much to interpret the processes involved, the bulk of the paper is concerned with an analysis of various aspects of strategic interaction. These include being sophisticated, lying, cheating and bluffing.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979408880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979408880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1978.tb01311.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1978.tb01311.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 462

    EP - 473

    JO - Political Studies

    JF - Political Studies

    SN - 0032-3217

    IS - 4

    ER -