How much consumption insurance beyond self-insurance?

Greg Kaplan, Giovanni L. Violante

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We assess the degree of consumption smoothing implicit in a calibrated life-cycle version of the standard incomplete-markets model, and we compare it to the empirical estimates of Richard Blundell, Luigi Pistaferri, and Ian Preston (2008) (BPP hereafter) on US data. Households in the data have access to more consumption insurance against permanent earnings shocks than in the model. BPP estimate that 36 percent of permanent shocks are insurable, whereas the model's counterpart of the BPP estimator varies between 7 percent and 22 percent, depending on the tightness of debt limits. We also show that the BPP estimator has a downward bias that grows as borrowing limits become tighter. (JEL D31, D91, E21).

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)53-87
    Number of pages35
    JournalAmerican Economic Journal: Macroeconomics
    Volume2
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

    Fingerprint

    Self-insurance
    Consumption insurance
    Estimator
    Incomplete markets
    Market model
    Consumption smoothing
    Debt
    Permanent shock
    Borrowing
    Household
    Life cycle

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Cite this

    How much consumption insurance beyond self-insurance? / Kaplan, Greg; Violante, Giovanni L.

    In: American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 01.11.2010, p. 53-87.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Kaplan, Greg ; Violante, Giovanni L. / How much consumption insurance beyond self-insurance?. In: American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2010 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 53-87.
    @article{9257747182c94fa9a6dd0e38d2bad26a,
    title = "How much consumption insurance beyond self-insurance?",
    abstract = "We assess the degree of consumption smoothing implicit in a calibrated life-cycle version of the standard incomplete-markets model, and we compare it to the empirical estimates of Richard Blundell, Luigi Pistaferri, and Ian Preston (2008) (BPP hereafter) on US data. Households in the data have access to more consumption insurance against permanent earnings shocks than in the model. BPP estimate that 36 percent of permanent shocks are insurable, whereas the model's counterpart of the BPP estimator varies between 7 percent and 22 percent, depending on the tightness of debt limits. We also show that the BPP estimator has a downward bias that grows as borrowing limits become tighter. (JEL D31, D91, E21).",
    author = "Greg Kaplan and Violante, {Giovanni L.}",
    year = "2010",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1257/mac.2.4.53",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "53--87",
    journal = "American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics",
    issn = "1945-7707",
    publisher = "American Economic Association",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How much consumption insurance beyond self-insurance?

    AU - Kaplan, Greg

    AU - Violante, Giovanni L.

    PY - 2010/11/1

    Y1 - 2010/11/1

    N2 - We assess the degree of consumption smoothing implicit in a calibrated life-cycle version of the standard incomplete-markets model, and we compare it to the empirical estimates of Richard Blundell, Luigi Pistaferri, and Ian Preston (2008) (BPP hereafter) on US data. Households in the data have access to more consumption insurance against permanent earnings shocks than in the model. BPP estimate that 36 percent of permanent shocks are insurable, whereas the model's counterpart of the BPP estimator varies between 7 percent and 22 percent, depending on the tightness of debt limits. We also show that the BPP estimator has a downward bias that grows as borrowing limits become tighter. (JEL D31, D91, E21).

    AB - We assess the degree of consumption smoothing implicit in a calibrated life-cycle version of the standard incomplete-markets model, and we compare it to the empirical estimates of Richard Blundell, Luigi Pistaferri, and Ian Preston (2008) (BPP hereafter) on US data. Households in the data have access to more consumption insurance against permanent earnings shocks than in the model. BPP estimate that 36 percent of permanent shocks are insurable, whereas the model's counterpart of the BPP estimator varies between 7 percent and 22 percent, depending on the tightness of debt limits. We also show that the BPP estimator has a downward bias that grows as borrowing limits become tighter. (JEL D31, D91, E21).

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017100341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017100341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1257/mac.2.4.53

    DO - 10.1257/mac.2.4.53

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85017100341

    VL - 2

    SP - 53

    EP - 87

    JO - American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics

    JF - American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics

    SN - 1945-7707

    IS - 4

    ER -