How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data

Gregory Eady, Jonathan Nagler, Andy Guess, Jan Zilinsky, Joshua Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A major point of debate in the study of the Internet and politics is the extent to which social media platforms encourage citizens to inhabit online “bubbles” or “echo chambers,” exposed primarily to ideologically congenial political information. To investigate this question, we link a representative survey of Americans with data from respondents’ public Twitter accounts (N = 1,496). We then quantify the ideological distributions of users’ online political and media environments by merging validated estimates of user ideology with the full set of accounts followed by our survey respondents (N = 642,345) and the available tweets posted by those accounts (N ~ 1.2 billion). We study the extent to which liberals and conservatives encounter counter-attitudinal messages in two distinct ways: (a) by the accounts they follow and (b) by the tweets they receive from those accounts, either directly or indirectly (via retweets). More than a third of respondents do not follow any media sources, but among those who do, we find a substantial amount of overlap (51%) in the ideological distributions of accounts followed by users on opposite ends of the political spectrum. At the same time, however, we find asymmetries in individuals’ willingness to venture into cross-cutting spaces, with conservatives more likely to follow media and political accounts classified as left-leaning than the reverse. Finally, we argue that such choices are likely tempered by online news watching behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSAGE Open
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

twitter
social media
evidence
chamber
asymmetry
news
ideology
citizen
Internet
politics
Social Media
Bubble

Keywords

  • communication
  • communication technologies
  • mass communication
  • media & society
  • media consumption
  • new media
  • political behavior
  • political communication
  • political science
  • social sciences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data. / Eady, Gregory; Nagler, Jonathan; Guess, Andy; Zilinsky, Jan; Tucker, Joshua.

In: SAGE Open, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eady, Gregory ; Nagler, Jonathan ; Guess, Andy ; Zilinsky, Jan ; Tucker, Joshua. / How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data. In: SAGE Open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{afa66dff5a424d908709f4a06e526e91,
title = "How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data",
abstract = "A major point of debate in the study of the Internet and politics is the extent to which social media platforms encourage citizens to inhabit online “bubbles” or “echo chambers,” exposed primarily to ideologically congenial political information. To investigate this question, we link a representative survey of Americans with data from respondents’ public Twitter accounts (N = 1,496). We then quantify the ideological distributions of users’ online political and media environments by merging validated estimates of user ideology with the full set of accounts followed by our survey respondents (N = 642,345) and the available tweets posted by those accounts (N ~ 1.2 billion). We study the extent to which liberals and conservatives encounter counter-attitudinal messages in two distinct ways: (a) by the accounts they follow and (b) by the tweets they receive from those accounts, either directly or indirectly (via retweets). More than a third of respondents do not follow any media sources, but among those who do, we find a substantial amount of overlap (51{\%}) in the ideological distributions of accounts followed by users on opposite ends of the political spectrum. At the same time, however, we find asymmetries in individuals’ willingness to venture into cross-cutting spaces, with conservatives more likely to follow media and political accounts classified as left-leaning than the reverse. Finally, we argue that such choices are likely tempered by online news watching behavior.",
keywords = "communication, communication technologies, mass communication, media & society, media consumption, new media, political behavior, political communication, political science, social sciences",
author = "Gregory Eady and Jonathan Nagler and Andy Guess and Jan Zilinsky and Joshua Tucker",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2158244019832705",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "SAGE Open",
issn = "2158-2440",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data

AU - Eady, Gregory

AU - Nagler, Jonathan

AU - Guess, Andy

AU - Zilinsky, Jan

AU - Tucker, Joshua

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - A major point of debate in the study of the Internet and politics is the extent to which social media platforms encourage citizens to inhabit online “bubbles” or “echo chambers,” exposed primarily to ideologically congenial political information. To investigate this question, we link a representative survey of Americans with data from respondents’ public Twitter accounts (N = 1,496). We then quantify the ideological distributions of users’ online political and media environments by merging validated estimates of user ideology with the full set of accounts followed by our survey respondents (N = 642,345) and the available tweets posted by those accounts (N ~ 1.2 billion). We study the extent to which liberals and conservatives encounter counter-attitudinal messages in two distinct ways: (a) by the accounts they follow and (b) by the tweets they receive from those accounts, either directly or indirectly (via retweets). More than a third of respondents do not follow any media sources, but among those who do, we find a substantial amount of overlap (51%) in the ideological distributions of accounts followed by users on opposite ends of the political spectrum. At the same time, however, we find asymmetries in individuals’ willingness to venture into cross-cutting spaces, with conservatives more likely to follow media and political accounts classified as left-leaning than the reverse. Finally, we argue that such choices are likely tempered by online news watching behavior.

AB - A major point of debate in the study of the Internet and politics is the extent to which social media platforms encourage citizens to inhabit online “bubbles” or “echo chambers,” exposed primarily to ideologically congenial political information. To investigate this question, we link a representative survey of Americans with data from respondents’ public Twitter accounts (N = 1,496). We then quantify the ideological distributions of users’ online political and media environments by merging validated estimates of user ideology with the full set of accounts followed by our survey respondents (N = 642,345) and the available tweets posted by those accounts (N ~ 1.2 billion). We study the extent to which liberals and conservatives encounter counter-attitudinal messages in two distinct ways: (a) by the accounts they follow and (b) by the tweets they receive from those accounts, either directly or indirectly (via retweets). More than a third of respondents do not follow any media sources, but among those who do, we find a substantial amount of overlap (51%) in the ideological distributions of accounts followed by users on opposite ends of the political spectrum. At the same time, however, we find asymmetries in individuals’ willingness to venture into cross-cutting spaces, with conservatives more likely to follow media and political accounts classified as left-leaning than the reverse. Finally, we argue that such choices are likely tempered by online news watching behavior.

KW - communication

KW - communication technologies

KW - mass communication

KW - media & society

KW - media consumption

KW - new media

KW - political behavior

KW - political communication

KW - political science

KW - social sciences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062266200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062266200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2158244019832705

DO - 10.1177/2158244019832705

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - SAGE Open

JF - SAGE Open

SN - 2158-2440

IS - 1

ER -