How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field

Ethan D. Schoolman, Jeremy S. Guest, Kathleen F. Bush, Andrew Bell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Sustainability research is expected to incorporate concepts, methods, and data from a diverse array of academic disciplines. We investigate the extent to which sustainability research lives up to this ideal of an interdisciplinary field. Using bibliometric data, we orient our study around the "tripartite model" of sustainability, which suggests that sustainability research should draw from the three "pillars" of the environmental, economic, and social sciences. We ask three questions: (i) is sustainability research truly more interdisciplinary than research generally, (ii) to what extent does research grounded in one pillar draw on research from the other two, and (iii) if certain disciplines or pillars are more interdisciplinary than others, then what explains this variation? Our results indicate that sustainability science, while more interdisciplinary than other scientific fields, falls short of the expectations inherent in the tripartite model. The pillar with the fewest articles published on sustainability-economics-is also the most integrative, while the pillar with the most articles-environmental sciences-draws the least from outside disciplines. But interdisciplinarity comes at a cost: sustainability research in economics and the social sciences is centered around a relatively small number of interdisciplinary journals, which may be becoming less valued over time. These findings suggest that, if sustainability research is to live up to its interdisciplinary ideals, researchers must be provided with greater incentives to draw from fields other than their own.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)67-80
    Number of pages14
    JournalSustainability Science
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2012

    Fingerprint

    sustainability
    pillar
    Research
    Social Sciences
    Economics
    Ecology
    social science
    Bibliometrics
    economics
    interdisciplinarity
    interdisciplinary research
    environmental economics
    science
    Motivation
    incentive
    Research Personnel
    Costs and Cost Analysis
    costs
    cost

    Keywords

    • Academia
    • Bibliometric
    • Citation analysis
    • Interdisciplinarity
    • Sustainability science
    • Sustainable

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Health(social science)
    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Ecology
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
    • Nature and Landscape Conservation
    • Global and Planetary Change

    Cite this

    How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. / Schoolman, Ethan D.; Guest, Jeremy S.; Bush, Kathleen F.; Bell, Andrew.

    In: Sustainability Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 67-80.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Schoolman, Ethan D. ; Guest, Jeremy S. ; Bush, Kathleen F. ; Bell, Andrew. / How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. In: Sustainability Science. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 67-80.
    @article{8def904d4b5c406e809c432cf8253b0a,
    title = "How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field",
    abstract = "Sustainability research is expected to incorporate concepts, methods, and data from a diverse array of academic disciplines. We investigate the extent to which sustainability research lives up to this ideal of an interdisciplinary field. Using bibliometric data, we orient our study around the {"}tripartite model{"} of sustainability, which suggests that sustainability research should draw from the three {"}pillars{"} of the environmental, economic, and social sciences. We ask three questions: (i) is sustainability research truly more interdisciplinary than research generally, (ii) to what extent does research grounded in one pillar draw on research from the other two, and (iii) if certain disciplines or pillars are more interdisciplinary than others, then what explains this variation? Our results indicate that sustainability science, while more interdisciplinary than other scientific fields, falls short of the expectations inherent in the tripartite model. The pillar with the fewest articles published on sustainability-economics-is also the most integrative, while the pillar with the most articles-environmental sciences-draws the least from outside disciplines. But interdisciplinarity comes at a cost: sustainability research in economics and the social sciences is centered around a relatively small number of interdisciplinary journals, which may be becoming less valued over time. These findings suggest that, if sustainability research is to live up to its interdisciplinary ideals, researchers must be provided with greater incentives to draw from fields other than their own.",
    keywords = "Academia, Bibliometric, Citation analysis, Interdisciplinarity, Sustainability science, Sustainable",
    author = "Schoolman, {Ethan D.} and Guest, {Jeremy S.} and Bush, {Kathleen F.} and Andrew Bell",
    year = "2012",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "67--80",
    journal = "Sustainability Science",
    issn = "1862-4065",
    publisher = "Springer Japan",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field

    AU - Schoolman, Ethan D.

    AU - Guest, Jeremy S.

    AU - Bush, Kathleen F.

    AU - Bell, Andrew

    PY - 2012/1

    Y1 - 2012/1

    N2 - Sustainability research is expected to incorporate concepts, methods, and data from a diverse array of academic disciplines. We investigate the extent to which sustainability research lives up to this ideal of an interdisciplinary field. Using bibliometric data, we orient our study around the "tripartite model" of sustainability, which suggests that sustainability research should draw from the three "pillars" of the environmental, economic, and social sciences. We ask three questions: (i) is sustainability research truly more interdisciplinary than research generally, (ii) to what extent does research grounded in one pillar draw on research from the other two, and (iii) if certain disciplines or pillars are more interdisciplinary than others, then what explains this variation? Our results indicate that sustainability science, while more interdisciplinary than other scientific fields, falls short of the expectations inherent in the tripartite model. The pillar with the fewest articles published on sustainability-economics-is also the most integrative, while the pillar with the most articles-environmental sciences-draws the least from outside disciplines. But interdisciplinarity comes at a cost: sustainability research in economics and the social sciences is centered around a relatively small number of interdisciplinary journals, which may be becoming less valued over time. These findings suggest that, if sustainability research is to live up to its interdisciplinary ideals, researchers must be provided with greater incentives to draw from fields other than their own.

    AB - Sustainability research is expected to incorporate concepts, methods, and data from a diverse array of academic disciplines. We investigate the extent to which sustainability research lives up to this ideal of an interdisciplinary field. Using bibliometric data, we orient our study around the "tripartite model" of sustainability, which suggests that sustainability research should draw from the three "pillars" of the environmental, economic, and social sciences. We ask three questions: (i) is sustainability research truly more interdisciplinary than research generally, (ii) to what extent does research grounded in one pillar draw on research from the other two, and (iii) if certain disciplines or pillars are more interdisciplinary than others, then what explains this variation? Our results indicate that sustainability science, while more interdisciplinary than other scientific fields, falls short of the expectations inherent in the tripartite model. The pillar with the fewest articles published on sustainability-economics-is also the most integrative, while the pillar with the most articles-environmental sciences-draws the least from outside disciplines. But interdisciplinarity comes at a cost: sustainability research in economics and the social sciences is centered around a relatively small number of interdisciplinary journals, which may be becoming less valued over time. These findings suggest that, if sustainability research is to live up to its interdisciplinary ideals, researchers must be provided with greater incentives to draw from fields other than their own.

    KW - Academia

    KW - Bibliometric

    KW - Citation analysis

    KW - Interdisciplinarity

    KW - Sustainability science

    KW - Sustainable

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83055187988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83055187988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z

    DO - 10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 67

    EP - 80

    JO - Sustainability Science

    JF - Sustainability Science

    SN - 1862-4065

    IS - 1

    ER -