How does social essentialism affect the development of inter-group relations?

Marjorie Rhodes, Sarah Jane Leslie, Katya Saunders, Yarrow Dunham, Andrei Cimpian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Psychological essentialism is a pervasive conceptual bias to view categories as reflecting something deep, stable, and informative about their members. Scholars from diverse disciplines have long theorized that psychological essentialism has negative ramifications for inter-group relations, yet little previous empirical work has experimentally tested the social implications of essentialist beliefs. Three studies (N = 127, ages 4.5-6) found that experimentally inducing essentialist beliefs about a novel social category led children to share fewer resources with category members, but did not lead to the out-group dislike that defines social prejudice. These findings indicate that essentialism negatively influences some key components of inter-group relations, but does not lead directly to the development of prejudice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDevelopmental Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

How does social essentialism affect the development of inter-group relations? / Rhodes, Marjorie; Leslie, Sarah Jane; Saunders, Katya; Dunham, Yarrow; Cimpian, Andrei.

In: Developmental Science, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6bc5b72ebef4ee4aab4c19f692b72d4,
title = "How does social essentialism affect the development of inter-group relations?",
abstract = "Psychological essentialism is a pervasive conceptual bias to view categories as reflecting something deep, stable, and informative about their members. Scholars from diverse disciplines have long theorized that psychological essentialism has negative ramifications for inter-group relations, yet little previous empirical work has experimentally tested the social implications of essentialist beliefs. Three studies (N = 127, ages 4.5-6) found that experimentally inducing essentialist beliefs about a novel social category led children to share fewer resources with category members, but did not lead to the out-group dislike that defines social prejudice. These findings indicate that essentialism negatively influences some key components of inter-group relations, but does not lead directly to the development of prejudice.",
author = "Marjorie Rhodes and Leslie, {Sarah Jane} and Katya Saunders and Yarrow Dunham and Andrei Cimpian",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/desc.12509",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Developmental Science",
issn = "1363-755X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does social essentialism affect the development of inter-group relations?

AU - Rhodes, Marjorie

AU - Leslie, Sarah Jane

AU - Saunders, Katya

AU - Dunham, Yarrow

AU - Cimpian, Andrei

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Psychological essentialism is a pervasive conceptual bias to view categories as reflecting something deep, stable, and informative about their members. Scholars from diverse disciplines have long theorized that psychological essentialism has negative ramifications for inter-group relations, yet little previous empirical work has experimentally tested the social implications of essentialist beliefs. Three studies (N = 127, ages 4.5-6) found that experimentally inducing essentialist beliefs about a novel social category led children to share fewer resources with category members, but did not lead to the out-group dislike that defines social prejudice. These findings indicate that essentialism negatively influences some key components of inter-group relations, but does not lead directly to the development of prejudice.

AB - Psychological essentialism is a pervasive conceptual bias to view categories as reflecting something deep, stable, and informative about their members. Scholars from diverse disciplines have long theorized that psychological essentialism has negative ramifications for inter-group relations, yet little previous empirical work has experimentally tested the social implications of essentialist beliefs. Three studies (N = 127, ages 4.5-6) found that experimentally inducing essentialist beliefs about a novel social category led children to share fewer resources with category members, but did not lead to the out-group dislike that defines social prejudice. These findings indicate that essentialism negatively influences some key components of inter-group relations, but does not lead directly to the development of prejudice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013409021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013409021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/desc.12509

DO - 10.1111/desc.12509

M3 - Article

C2 - 28229563

AN - SCOPUS:85013409021

JO - Developmental Science

JF - Developmental Science

SN - 1363-755X

ER -